Roles, relationships, and groups in organizations: Some conclusions and recommendations

Small Group Research

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 123-154

  Hare, A Paul ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Roles, relationships, and groups in organizations; Small group phenomena; Small groups literature

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037272941     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496402250430     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Alvarez, R., & Robin, L. (1992). Organizational structure. In E. F. Borgatta & M. L. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 1394-1404). New York: Macmillan.
2. Aron, A., & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 535-551.
3. Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, testability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 75-85.
4. Bales, R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems: Theory and measurement. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
5. Bass, B. M. (1997). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 318-333). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
6. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Beck, A. P., Eng, A. M., & Brusa, J. A. (1989). The evolution of leadership during group development. Group, 13(3-4), 155-164.
8. Benne, K. D., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-49.
9. Blake, R. F., Mouton, J. S., & Allen, R. L. (1987). Spectacular teamwork. New York: John Wiley.
10. Blake, R. F., Mouton, J. S., & McCanse, A. A. (1989). Change by design. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
11. Blumberg, H. H., Hare, A. P., Davies, M. F., & Kent, M. V. (in press). Small group research: A handbook: 1988-2002. New York: Greenwood.
12. Blumberg, H. H., Hare, A. P., Kent, M. V., & Davies, M. F. (Eds.) (1983). Small groups and social interaction (Vols. I & II). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
13. Burningham, C., & West, M. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26(1), 106-117.
14. Byrd, R. E. (1993). Teambuilding and its risks. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 103-107). New York: Marcel Dekker.
15. Cini, M. A., Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1993). Group staffing levels and responses to prospective and new group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 723-734.
16. Conger, J. A. (1997). The dark side of leadership. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 215-232). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
17. Conger, J. A. (1998). The dark side of leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 250-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Converse, J., Jr., & Foa, U. G. (1993). Some principles of equity in interpersonal exchanges. In U. G. Foa & J. Converse Jr. (Eds.), Resource theory: Explorations and applications (pp. 31-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Couch, A. S. (1960). Psychological determinants of interpersonal behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
20. Crouch, A., & Yetton, P. (1988). The management team: An equilibrium model of management performance and behavior. In J. G. Hunt & B. R. Baliga (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas. International leadership symposia series (pp. 107-127). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath.
21. Dyer, W. G. (1987). Team building: Issues and alternatives (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Effrat, A. (1968, Spring). Editor's introduction (Applications of Parsonian theory). Sociological Inquiry, 38, 97-103.
23. Elloy, D. F., & Randolph, A. (1997). The effect of superleader behavior on autonomous work groups in a government-operated railway service. Public Personnel Management, 26(2), 257-272.
24. Fineholt, T., & Sproull, L. S. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1, 41 -46.
25. Foa, U. G. (1993). Interpersonal and economic resources. In U. G. Foa & J. Converse. Jr. (Eds.), Resource theory: Explorations and applications (pp. 13-30). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. R. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
27. Foa, U. G., Salcedo, L. N., Toernblom, K. Y., Garner, M., Glaubman, H., & Teichman, M. (1993). Interrelation of social resources: Evidence of pancultural invariance. In U. G. Foa & J. Converse, Jr. (Eds.), Resource theory: Explorations and applications (pp. 57-64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Foushee, H. G. (1984). Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. American Psychologist, 39, 885-893.
29. Gersick, C. J. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 274-309.
30. Ginnett, R. C. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. In E. L. Weiner, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 71-98). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Golembiewski, R. T. (1993). Role analysis technique. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational consultation (pp. 357-358). New York: Marcel Dekker.
32. Gosenpud, J. (1989). The prediction of simulation performance as it is affected by time. Simulation and Games, 20(3), 319-350.
33. Hackman, J. R. (1993). Teams, leaders, and organizations: New directions for crew-oriented flight training. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 47-69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Hare, A. P. (1968). Groups: Role structure. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 283-288). New York: Free Press/Macmillan.
35. Hare, A. P. (1972). Bibliography of small group research: 1959-1969. Sociometry, 35(1), 1-150.
36. Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1962)
37. Hare, A. P. (1982). Creativity in small groups. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Hare, A. P. (1992a), Group problem solving. In E. F. Borgatta & M. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 784-788). New York: Macmillan.
39. Hare, A. P. (1992b). Group size effects. In E. F. Borgatta & M. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 788-791). New York: Macmillan.
40. Hare, A. P. (1992c). Groups, teams, and social interaction: Theories and applications. New York: Praeger.
41. Hare, A. P. ( 1993). Small groups in organizations. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 61-89). New York: Marcel Dekker.
42. Hare, A. P. (1994). Individual versus group. In A. P. Hare, H. H. Blumberg, M. F. Davies, & M. V. Kent (Eds.), Small group research: A handbook (pp. 261-270). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
43. Hare, A. P. (1999). Been there, done that: Role repertoire as a predictor of interpersonal behavior in a given situation. The International Journal of Action Methods, 52(2), 80-95.
44. Hare, A. P. (2002). Psychodynamics of group relationships. In Encyclopedia of life support systems. Paris: UNESCO-EOLSS.
45. Hare, A. P., & Blumberg, H. H. (1988). Dramaturgical analysis of social interaction. New York: Praeger.
46. Hare, A. P., Blumberg, H. H., Davies, M. F., & Kent, M. V. (1994). Small group research: A handbook. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47. Hare, A. P., Blumberg, H. H., Davies, M. F., & Kent, M. V. (1996). Small groups: An introduction. Westport, CT: Praeger.
48. Hare, A. P., Borgatta, E. F., & Bales, R. F. (Eds.) (1965). Small groups: Studies in social interaction (Rev. ed.). New York: Knopf. (Original work published 1955)
49. Hare, S. E., & Hare, A. P. (Eds.). (1996). SYMLOG field theory: Organizational consultation, value differences, personality, and social perception. Westport, CT: Praeger.
50. Hare, A. P., Sjovold, E., Baker, H. G., & Powers, J. P. (in press). Analysis of social interaction systems: SYMLOG research and applications. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
51. Hassebrauck, M., & Buhl, T. (1996). Three-dimensional love. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(1), 121-122.
52. Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (1998). Contingency theories of leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.), Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 141-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Hutchins, E. ( 1990). The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 191-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Kameda, T., Stasson, M. F., Davis, J. H., Parks, C. D., & Zimmerman, S. K. (1992). Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups: In search of an "optimal" team size in division of work. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(1), 47-56.
55. Kerr, N. L. (1989). Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(4), 287-313.
56. Kew, F. (1987). Contested rules: An explanation of how games change. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 22, 125-135.
57. Keyton, J. (1993). Group termination: Completing the study of group development. Small Group Research, 24(1), 84-100.
58. Kline, T. J. B., & MacLeod, M. (1997). Predicting organizational team performance. Organization Development Journal, 15(4), 77-84.
59. Krayer, K. J. (1988). Exploring group maturity in the classroom: Differences in behavioral, affective, and performance outcomes between mature and immature groups. Small Group Behavior, 19(2), 259-272.
60. Langfred, C. W. (1998). Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance. Small Group Research, 29(1), 124-143.
61. Leavitt, H. J. (1972). Managerial psychology: An introduction to individuals, pairs, and groups in organizations (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Littlepage, G. E., & Silbiger, H. (1992). Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Research, 23(3), 344-355.
63. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1997). Superleadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 411-428). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
64. Maples, M. F. (1988). Group development: Extending Tuckman's theory. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 13(1), 17-23.
65. McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1991). Levels of analysis: The individual, the dyad, and the larger social group. In B. M. Montgomery & S. Duck (Eds.), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 56-81). New York: Guilford.
66. McCann, J., & Galbraith, J. R. (1981). Interdepartmental relations. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 2, pp, 60-84). New York: Oxford University Press.
67. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147-174.
68. Milanovich, D. M., Driskell, J. E, Stout, R. J., & Salas, E. (1998). Status and cockpit dynamics: A review and empirical study. Group Dynamics, 2(3), 155-167.
69. Mischel, L. J., & Northcraft, G. B. (1997). "I think we can, I think we can ... ": The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness. In B. Markovsky & M. J. Lovaglia (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 14, pp. 177-197). Stamford, CT: JAI.
70. Morgan, B. B., Salas, E., & Glickman, A. S. (1993). An analysis of team evolution and maturation. Journal of General Psychology, 720(3), 277-291.
71. Mudrack, P. E., & Farrell, G. M. (1994). The need for dominance scale of the Manifest Needs Questionnaire and role behaviour in groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43(3), 399-413.
72. Mudrack, P. E., & Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behavior and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26(4), 542-571.
73. Olmsted, M. S. (1959). The small group. New York: Random House.
74. Olmsted, M. S., & Hare, A. P. (1978). The small group (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
75. Owens, D. A., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Strategic formation of groups: Issues in task performance and team member selection. In D. H. Gruenfeld (Ed.), Composition. Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 149-165). Stamford, CT: JAI.
76. Parsons, T. (1961). Outline of the social system. In T. Parsons, E. A. Shils, R. D. Naegle, & J. R. Pitts (Eds.), Theories of society (pp. 30-79). New York: Free Press.
77. Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1953). The dimensions of action space. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in a theory of action (pp. 63-109). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
78. Peabody, D., & De Raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 983-997.
79. Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552-567.
80. Polley, R. B., Hare, A. P., & Stone, P. J. (Eds.). (1988). The SYMLOG practitioner: Applications of small group research. New York: Praeger.
81. Riefer, D. M. (1993). Behavior engineering proposals: V. An experimental comparison of team versus solo proofreading. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(1), 111-117.
82. Seers, A., & Woodruff, S. (1997). Temporal pacing in task forces: Group development or deadline pressure? Journal of Management, 23(2), 169-187.
83. Seifert, C. M., & Hutchins, E. L. (1992). Error as opportunity: Learning in a cooperative task. Human Computer Interaction, 7, 409-435.
84. Sokol, M. B. (1992). Time boundaries, task commitment, and the illusion of group immortality. Consulting Psychology Journal, 44(3), 28-32.
85. Stasson, M. F., & Bradshaw, S. D. (1995). Explanations of individual/group performance differences: What sort of "bonus" can be gained through group interaction? Small Group Research, 26(2), 296-308.
86. Sternberg, R. T. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.
87. Sternberg, R. T. (1987). Liking versus loving: A comparative analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 331-345.
88. Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What's important for team functioning? Military Psychology, 6(3), 177-192.
89. Strotdbeck, F. L., & Hare, A. P. (1954). Bibliography of small group research: From 1900 through 1953. Sociometry, 17, 107-178.
90. St. Yves, A., Freeston, M. H., Jacques, C., & Robitaille, C. (1990). Love of animals and interpersonal affectionate behavior. Psychological Reports, 67(3, Part 2), 1067-1075.
91. Sundstrom, E., & Altman, I. (1989). Physical environments and workgroup effectiveness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 175-209.
92. Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pace-making and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
93. Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it confirms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 371-393.
94. Turniansky, B., & Hare, A. P. (1998). Individuals and groups in organizations. London: Sage.
95. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23(1), 49-73.
96. Valacich, J. S., Wheeler, B.C., Mennecke, B. E., & Wachter, R. (1995). The effects of numerical and logical group size on computer-mediated idea generation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(3), 318-329.
97. Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism/collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 152-172.
98. Wekselberg, V., Goggin, W. C., & Collings, T. J. (1997). A multifaceted concept of group maturity and its measurement and relationship to group performance. Small Group Research, 28(1), 3-28.
99. Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32(4), 307-334.
100. Whitney, K. (1994). Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy. Human Performance, 7(1), 55-78.
101. Wolpert, L., & Richards, A. (1988). A passion for science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.