Detecting differential expression in microarray data: Comparison of optimal procedures

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Perelman, Elena ^a   Ploner, Alexander ^a   Calza, Stefano ^a,b   Pawitan, Yudi ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnologies ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSIONS; DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENE; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; LIKELIHOOD RATIO TESTS; MICROARRAY DATA; MULTIPLE TESTING; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE;

OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICS;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; B CELL LYMPHOMA; BREAST CANCER; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FAMILIAL CANCER; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OPTIMAL DISCOVERY PROCEDURE; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UPREGULATION; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; DNA MICROARRAY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33847120762     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-28     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allison DB Cui X Page GP Sabripour M Microarray data analysis: From disarray to consolidation and consensus Nat Rev Genet 2006 7 55-65 10.1038/nrg1749 16369572
2. Datta S Datta S Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies Bioinformatics 2005 21 9 1987-94 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti301 15691856
3. Benjamini Y Hochberg Y Controlling the false discovery rate - A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J Roy Stat Soc B 1995 57 289-300
4. Choe S Boutros M Michelson A Church G Halfon M Preferred analysis methods for Affymetrix GeneChips revealed by a wholly defined control dataset Genome Biology 2005 6 2 R16 551536 15693945 10.1186/ gb-2005-6-2-r16
5. Storey JD The Optimal Discovery Procedure: A New Approach to Simultaneous Significance Testing UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series Working Paper 259 2005 http://www.bepress.com/uwbiostat/paper259
6. Storey JD Dai JY Leek JT The Optimal Discovery Procedure for Large-Scale Significance Testing, with Applications to Comparative Microarray Experiments UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series Working Paper 260 2005 http://www.bepress.com/uwbiostat/paper260
7. Ploner A Calza S Gusnanto A Pawitan Y Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies Bioinformatics 2006 22 5 556-565 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk013 16368770
8. Storey JD Tibshirani R Statistical significance for genomewide studies Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003 100 16 9440-5 170937 12883005 10.1073/ pnas.1530509100
9. Efron B Tibshirani R Storey J Tusher V Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment J Am Stat Soc 2001 96 456 1151-1160
10. Efron B Tibshirani R Chu GV Goss Microarrays and their use in a comparative experiment Technical report Stanford University 2000 http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/research.html
11. Tusher V Tibshirani R Chu G Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response PNAS 2001 98 9 5116-5121 33173 11309499 10.1073/pnas.091062498
12. Smyth G Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 2004 3 Article 3 http://www.bepress.com/sagmb/vol3/issl/art310.2202/1544-6115.1027
13. Hedenfalk I Duggan D Chen Y Radmacher M Bittner M Simon R Meltzer P Gusterson B Esteller M Kallioniemi OP Wilfond B Borg A Trent J Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer N Engl J Med 2001 344 8 539-48 10.1056/NEJM200102223440801 11207349
14. Rosenwald A Wright G Chan WC Connors JM Campo E Fisher RI Gascoyne RD Muller-Hermelink HK Smeland EB Giltnane JM Hurt EM Zhao H Averett L Yang L Wilson WH Jaffe ES Simon R Klausner RD Powell J Duffey PL Longo DL Greiner TC Weisenburger DD Sanger WG Dave BJ Lynch JC Vose J Armitage JO Montserrat E LApez-Guillermo A Grogan TM Miller TP LeBlanc M Ott G Kvaloy S Delabie J Holte H Krajci P Stokke T Staudt LM Project LMP The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma N Engl J Med 2002 346 25 1937-47 10.1056/ NEJMoa012914 12075054
15. Pounds S Cheng C Improving false discovery rate estimation Bioinformatics 2004 20 11 1737-45 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth160 14988112
16. Pounds S Cheng C Robust estimation of the false discovery rate Bioinformatics 2006 22 16 1979-1987 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl328 16777905
17. Pawitan Y Murthy KRK Michiels S Ploner A Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies Bioinformatics 2005 21 20 3865-3872 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti626 16105901
18. Bioconductor http://www.bioconductor.org
19. Leek JT Monsen E Dabney AR Storey JD EDGE: Extraction and analysis of differential gene expression Bioinformatics 2006 22 4 507-508 10.1093/ bioinformatics/btk005 16357033
20. EDGE http://www.biostat.washington.edu/software/jstorey/edge