A test of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the alcohol-IAT

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 292-300

  Houben, Katrijn ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Figure ground asymmetries; Implicit alcohol associations; Implicit association test

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CARBONATED BEVERAGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; ALCOHOLISM; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CARBONATED BEVERAGES; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33847114292     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.292     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beringer, J. (1996). Experimental Run Time System (ERTS), Version 3.18. Frankfurt, Germany: BeriSoft.
2. Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 631-643.
3. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
4. Dasgupta, N., McGhee, D. E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2000). Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316-328.
5. De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Koster, E.H.W., & De Beul, N. (2004). Implicit alcohol-related cognitions in a clinical sample of heavy drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 35, 275-286.
6. Field, M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2006). Attention to drugrelated cues in drug abuse and addiction: component processes. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction (pp. 151-163). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
7. Fleming, M. F., Barry, K. L., & MacDonald, R. (1991). The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a college sample. The International Journal of the Addictions, 26, 1173-1185.
8. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
9. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
10. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Klauer, K. C. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the IAT: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 420-425.
11. Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
12. Houben, K., & Wiers, R. W. (2006). Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the IAT: Fact or artifact? Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1346-1362.
13. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (in press). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. New York: Psychology Press.
14. Ottaway, S. A., Hayden, D.C., & Oakes, M. A. (2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 19, 97-144.
15. Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 139-165.
17. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the IAT: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 426-430.
18. Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79-82.
19. Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., Melliot, D. S., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association test. Social Cognition, 17, 437-465.
20. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction, 88, 791-804.
21. Wiers, R. W., Houben, K., Smulders, F. T. Y., Conrod, P. J., & Jones, B. T. (2006). To drink or not to drink: The role of automatic and controlled processes in the etiology of alcohol-related problems. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction (pp. 339-361). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Wiers, R. W., van de Luitgaarden, J., van den Wildenberg, E., & Smulders, F.T.Y. (2005). Challenging implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in young heavy drinkers. Addiction, 100, 806-819.
23. Wiers, R. W., Van Woerden, N., Smulders, F.T.Y., & de long, P. J. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 648-658.
24. Zack, M., Toneatto, T., & Macleod, C. M. (1999). Implicit activation of alcohol concepts by negative affective cues distinguishes between problem drinkers with high and low psychiatric distress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 518-531.