An analytical model for traffic delays and the dynamic user equilibrium problem

Operations Research

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1151-1171

  Perakis, Georgia ^a   Roels, Guillaume ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mode route choice; Transportation: Models assignment

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC USER EQUILIBRIUM (DUE); KINEMATIC WAVES; TRAFFIC DYNAMICS; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; TRANSPORTATION; URBAN PLANNING;

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 33847034400     PISSN: 0030364X     EISSN: 15265463     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1060.0307     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Carey, M., Y. E. Ge, M. McCartney. 2003. A whole-link travel-time model with desirable properties. Transportation Sci. 37(1) 83-96.
2. Cayford, R., W.-H. Lin, C. F. Daganzo. 1997. The NETCELL simulation package: Technical description. Research report UCB-ITS-PRR-97-23, University of California, Berkeley, CA. http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~daganzo.
3. Daganzo, C. F. 1994. The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Res. B 28(4) 269-287.
4. Daganzo, C. F. 1995a. The cell transmission model. Part II: Network traffic. Transportation Res. B 29(2) 79-93.
5. Daganzo, C. F. 1995b. A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow. Transportation Res. B 29(4) 261-276.
6. Daganzo, C. F. 1995c. Properties of link travel time function under dynamic loads. Transportation Res. B 29(2) 95-98.
7. Edwards, C. H., Jr., D. E. Penney. 1985. Elementary Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Friesz, T. L., D. Bernstein, T. E. Smith, R. L. Tobin, B.-W. Wie. 1993. A variational inequality formulation for the dynamic user equilibrium problem. Oper. Res. 41(1) 179-191.
9. Gazis, D., R. Herman, R. W. Rothery. 1961. Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper. Res. 9(4) 545-567.
10. Greenshields, B. 1935. A study of traffic capacity. Highway Res. Board Proc. 14 468-477.
11. Haberman, R. 1977. Mathematical Models; Mechanical Vibrations, Population Dynamics and Traffic Flow. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Herman, R., E. W. Montroll, R. B. Potts, R. W. Rothery. 1959. Traffic dynamics: Analysis of stability in car following. Oper. Res. 7 86-106.
13. Hurdle, V., B. Son. 2000. Road test of a free way model. Transportation Res. B 34(7) 537-564.
14. Kachani, S., G. Perakis. 2001. Modeling travel times in dynamic transportation networks: A fluid dynamics approach. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
15. Khoo, B. C., G. C. Lin, J. Peraire, G. Perakis. 2002. A dynamic userequilibrium model with travel times computed from simulation. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
16. Kuwahara, M., T. Akamatsu. 2001. Dynamic user optimal assignment with physical queues for a many-to-many OD pattern. Transportation Res. B 35 461-479.
17. Li, J., O. Fujiwara, S. Kawakami. 2000. A reactive dynamic user equilibrium model in a network with queues. Transportation Res. B 34 605-624.
18. Lighthill, M. J., G. B. Whitham. 1955. On kinematic waves: II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 229 317-345.
19. Lin, W.-H., H. K. Lo. 2000. Are the objectives and solutions of dynamic user-equilibrium models always consistent? Transportation Res. A 34 137-144.
20. Mahut, M. 2000. Discrete flow model for dynamic network loading. Ph.D. thesis, Département d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
21. Martos, B. 1975. Nonlinear Programming. Theory and Methods. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
22. Nagurney, A. 1993. Network economics: A variational inequality approach. Advances in Computational Economics, Vol. 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
23. Newell, G. F. 1993. A simplified theory of kinematic waves in highway traffic, I. General theory; II. Queuing at freeway bottlenecks; III. Multidestination flows. Transportation Res. B 27(4) 281-314.
24. Patriksson, M. 1994. The traffic assignment problem: Models and methods. Topics in Transportation. VSP BV, Zeist, The Netherlands.
25. Perakis, G. 2000. Dynamic traffic flow problems: A hydrodynamic theory approach. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
26. Ran, B., D. E. Boyce. 1994. Dynamic urban transportation network models. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 417. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
27. Ran, B., N. M. Rouphail, A. Tarko, D. E. Boyce. 1997. Toward a class of link travel time functions for dynamic assignment models on signalized networks. Transportation Res. B 31(4) 277-290.
28. Richards, P. I. 1956. Shock waves on the highway. Oper. Res. 4 42-51.
29. Schrank, D., T. Lomax. 2003. The 2003 annual urban mobility report. Technical report, Texas Transportation Institute, http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/ report/.
30. Velan, S. 2000. The cell transmission model: A new look at a dynamic network loading model. Ph.D. thesis, Centre de Recherche sur les Transports, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
31. Ziliaskopoulos, A. K. 2000. A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Sci. 34(1) 37-49.