Racialized research identities in ESL/EFL research

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 573-594

  Lee, Ena ^a   Simon Maeda, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Nagoya University of Economics   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847009094     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/40264544     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.
2. Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 899-917.
3. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Sciences Information. Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 16, 645-668.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. In J. B. Thompson, G. Raymond, & M. Adamson (Eds.), Trans. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
6. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7. Braine, G. (1999). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Britzman, D. P. (1995). Beyond innocent readings: Educational ethnography as a crisis of representation. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Continuity and contradiction: The futures of the sociology of education (pp. 133-156). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
9. Canagarajah, A. S. (1996). From critical research practice to critical research reporting. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 321-331.
10. Canagarajah, A. S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11. Carter, M. (2003). Telling tales out of school: "What's the fate of a Black story in a White world of White stories?" In G. R, Lopez & L. Parker (Eds.), Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology (pp. 29-48). New York: Peter Lang.
12. Chaudhry, L. N. (2001). "You should know what's right for me!" A hybrid's struggle to define empowerment for critical feminist research in education. In B. M. Merchant & A. I. Willis (Eds.), Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research (pp. 33-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
14. Davis, K. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 427-453.
15. Davis, K., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Gender and language education [Special issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3).
16. Dei, G. J. S., Mazzuca, J., McIsaac, E., & Zine, J. (1997). Reconstructing "drop-out": A critical ethnography of the dynamics of Black students ' disengagement from school. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
17. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Enos, A. D. (2001). A landscape with multiple views: Research in Pueblo communities. In B. M. Merchant & A. I. Willis (Eds.), Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research (pp. 83-101). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Fine, M. (1998). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin &Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues (pp. 130-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 107-132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Foucault, M. (1972). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 109-133). New York: Pantheon.
23. Foucault, M. (1977). Intellectuals and power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. In D. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 205-217). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24. Fujimura-Fanselow, K., & Kameda, A. (Eds.). (1995). Japanese women: New feminist perspectives on the past, present, and future. New York: Feminist Press at the City University of New York.
25. Gallagher, C. A. (2000). White like me? Methods, meaning, and manipulation in the field of White studies. In F. W. Twine & J. W. Warren (Eds.), Rating research, researching race: Methodological dilemmas in critical race studies (pp. 67-92). New York: New York University Press.
26. Goldstein, T. (1997). Two languages at work: Bilingual life on the production floor. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Goldstein, T. (2003). Teaching and learning in a multilingual school: Choices, risks, and dilemmas. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you! What can "we" do for "you"?: Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54-73). New York: Routledge.
29. Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In S. Hall, D. Held & T. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures (pp. 273-325). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
30. Harasym, S. (Ed.) (1990). The post-colonial critic: Interviews, strategies, dialogues. New York: Routledge.
31. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32. Islam, N. (2000). Research as an act of betrayal: Researching race in an Asian community in Los Angeles. In F. W. Twine & J. W. Warren (Eds.), Racing research, researching race: Methodological dilemmas in critical race studies (pp. 35-66). New York: New York University Press.
33. Jordan, S., & Yeomans, D. (1995). Critical ethnography: Problems in contemporary theory and practice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16, 389-408.
34. Kanno, Y. (1997, March). Researcher-participant relationship in narrative inquiry. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
35. Kim, J. H. S. (2001). Asian Americans: Refuting the myth, changing faces. In B. M. Merchant & A. I. Willis (Eds.), Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research (pp. 103-133). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
36. Kubota, R. (2002). Comments on Ryuko Kubota's "Discursive construction of the images of U.S. classrooms." The author responds: (Un) raveling racism in a nice field like TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 84-92.
37. Kubota, R. (2005, February 21). Review of Onna rashiku (Like a woman): The diary of a language learner in Japan. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from http://edrev.asu.edu/reviews/rev357.htm.
38. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American ethnological society (pp. 286-338). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
39. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 257-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Lather, P. (1986a). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
41. Lather, P. (1986b). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257-277.
42. Liddle, J., & Nakajima, S. (2000). Rising suns, rising daughters: Gender, class, and power in Japan. London: Zed Books.
43. Lin, A., & Luk, J. (2002). Beyond progressive liberalism and cultural relativism: Towards critical postmodernist, sociohistorically situated perspectives in classroom studies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 97-124.
44. Lin, A., Grant, R., Kubota, R., Motha, S., Sachs, G. T., Vandrick, S., et al. (2004). Women faculty of color in TESOL: Theorizing our lived experiences. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 487-504.
45. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2000). The seventh moment: Out of the past. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1047-1065). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Luke, C. (1992). Feminist politics in radical pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 25-53), New York: Routledge.
47. Luke, C., & Gore, J. (1992). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
48. Mehra, B. (2001). Research or personal quest? Dilemmas in studying my own kind. In B. M. Merchant & A. I. Willis (Eds.), Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research (pp. 69-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Merchant, B. M., & Willis, A. I. (Eds.). (2001). Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial dis-courses. Feminist Review, 30, (pp. 61-88).
51. Munro, P. (1998). Subject to fiction: Women teacher life history narratives and cultural politics. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
52. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman.
53. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Peirce, B. N. (1995). The theory of methodology in qualitative research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 569-576.
55. Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 589-618.
56. Pennycook, A. (1994). Critical pedagogical approaches to research. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 673-703.
57. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Pennycook, A. (2005). Performing the personal. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4, 297-304.
59. Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175-196.
60. Piquero-Ballescas, M. R. (1993). Filipino entertainers in Japan: An introduction. Quezon City: Philippines: The Foundation for Nationalist Studies.
61. Racist question costs agency ¥500,000. (2003, January 16). Asahi Shimbun, p. 20.
62. Ramanathan, V. (2005). Some impossibilities around researcher location: Tensions around divergent audiences, languages, social stratifications. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4, 293-297.
63. Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Ethnographic approaches and methods in L2 writing research: A critical guide and review. Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 44-70.
64. Roman, L. G. (1997). Denying (White) racial privilege: Redemption discourses and the uses of fantasy. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L. Powell, & L. Mun Wong (Eds.), Off White: Readings on society, race, and culture (pp. 270-282). New York: Routledge.
65. Simon, R., & Dippo, D. (1986). On critical ethnographic work. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 17, 195-202.
66. Simon-Maeda, A. (2004). The complex construction of professional identities: Female EFL educators in Japan speak out. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 406-436.
67. Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. London: Sage.
68. Twine, F. W. (2000). Racial ideologies and racial methodologies. In F. W. Twine & J. W. Warren (Eds.), Racing research, researching race: Methodological dilemmas in critical race studies (pp. 1-34). New York: New York University Press.
69. Tyson, C. (2003). Research, race, and an epistemology of emancipation. In G. R. Lopez & L. Parker (Eds.), Interrogating racism in qualitative research methodology (pp. 19-28). New York: Peter Lang.
70. Vargas, L. (Ed.) (2002). Women faculty of color in the classroom. New York: Peter Lang.
71. Weedon, C. (1999). Feminism, theory and the politics of difference. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
72. Zurita, M. (2001). La mojada y el coyote: Experiences of a wetback researcher. In B. M. Merchant & A. I. Willis (Eds.), Multiple and intersecting identities in qualitative research (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.