Looking back, taking stock, moving forward: Investigating gender in TESOL

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 381-404

  Davis, Kathryn A ^a   Skilton Sylvester, Ellen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b ARCADIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745962536     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588346     Document Type: Article

References (139)

1. Auerbach, E. (1992). Making meaning, making change: Participatory curriculum development for adult ESL literacy. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems.
2. Auerbach, E. (1995). From deficit to strength: Changing perspectives on family literacy. In G. Weinstein-Shr & E. Quintero (Eds.), Immigrant learners and their families (pp. 63-76). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
3. Belcher, D., & Connor, U. (Eds.). (2001). Reflections on multiliterate lives. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
4. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Bergvall, V. (1999). Toward a comprehensive theory of language and gender. Language in Society, 28, 273-293.
6. Braine, G. (1999). (Ed.). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
9. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
10. Cameron, D. (1990). Feminism and linguistic theory (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
11. Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. New York: Routledge.
12. Cameron, D. (2004, May). Language, gender, and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Plenary address presented at the meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Portland, OR.
13. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H., & Richardson, K. (1992). Researching language: Issues of power and method. New York: Routledge.
14. Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. (2003) Language and sexuality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
16. Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17. Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructuralist investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Coates, J. (1993). Women, men, and language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
19. Coates, J., & Cameron, D. (1988). Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. New York: Longman.
20. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
23. Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Crookes, G., & Lehner, A. (1998). Aspects of process in an ESL critical pedagogy teacher education course. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 319-328.
25. Cumming, A., & Gill, J. (1991). Motivation or accessibility? Factors permitting Indo - Canadian women to pursue ESL literacy instruction. In B. Burnaby & A. Cumming (Eds.), Sociopolitical aspects of ESL education in Canada (pp. 241-252). Toronto, Canada: OISE.
26. Davis, K. A., Cho, H., Ishida, M., Soria, J., & Toohey, S. (in press). "It's our kuleana": A critical participatory approach to language minority education. In L. Pease-Alvarez & S. R. Schecter (Eds.), Learning, teaching, and community: Contributions of situated and participatory approaches to educational innovation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 215-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Duff, P. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography of communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289-322.
30. Duff, P. A., Wong, P., & Early, M. (2002). Learning language for work and life: The linguistic socialization of immigrant Canadians seeking careers in healthcare. Modern Language Journal 86(3), 397-422.
31. Eckert, P. (1994). Entering the heterosexual marketplace: Identities of subordination as a developmental imperative. (Working Papers on Learning and Identity No. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
32. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461-490.
33. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1998). Communities of practice: Where language, gender, and power all live. In J. Coates (Ed.), Language and gender: A reader (pp. 484-494). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
34. Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 421-446.
35. Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 73, 1-13.
36. Eisenstein, M. (1982). A study of social variation in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 32, 367-392.
37. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.
39. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
40. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
41. Farhady, H. (1982). Measures of language proficiency from the learner's perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 43-59.
42. Flax, J. (1987). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. SIGNS: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12, 621-643.
43. Freed, A. F. (1995). Language and gender. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 3-22.
44. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Toronto, Canada: Heinle & Heinle.
45. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
46. Frye, D. (1999). Participatory education as a critical framework for immigrant women's ESL class. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 501-513.
47. Gal, S. (1978). Peasant men can't get wives: Language change and sex roles in a bilingual community. Language in Society, 7, 1-16.
48. Gass, S. M., & Veronis, E. M. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327-351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
49. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Philadelphia: Falmer.
50. Goddard, A., & Patterson, L. M. (2000). Language and gender. London: Routledge.
51. Goldstein, T. (1995). "Nobody is talking bad": Creating community and claiming power on the production lines. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 375-400). New York: Routledge.
52. Goldstein, T. (2001). Researching women's language practices in multilingual workplaces. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (pp. 77-102). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
53. Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you! What can "we" do for "you"? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54-73). New York: Routledge.
54. Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
55. Gore, J. (1998). On the limits to empowerment through critical and feminist pedagogies. In D. Carlson & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Power/knowledge/pedagogy: The meaning of democratic education in unsettling times. Boulder, CO: Westview.
56. Hanke, R. (1992). Redesigning men: Hegemonic masculinity in transition. In S. Craig (Ed.), Men, masculinity, and the media (pp. 185-198). London: Sage.
57. Harklau, L.A. (1994). ESL and mainstream classes: Contrasting second language learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 241-272.
58. Harvey, P. (1994). The presence and absence of speech in the communication of gender. In P. Burton, K. Dyson, & S. Ardener (Eds.), Bilingual women: Anthropological approaches to second language use (pp. 44-64). Oxford, England: Berg.
59. Hatch, J. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
60. Hill, J. (1987). Women's speech in modern Mexicano. In S. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 121-160). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
61. Holmes, J. (1991). State of the art: Language and gender. Language Teaching 24, 207-220.
62. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School's out! Briding out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
63. Hurdis, R. (2002). Heartbroken: Women of color feminism and the third wave. In B. Rehman & D. Hernandez (Eds.), Colonize this: Young women of color on today's feminism. New York: Seal.
64. Kitetu, C., & Sunderland, J. (2002). Gendered discourses in the classroom: The importance of cultural diversity. Temple University Japan Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 17, 26-40.
65. Kline, R. (1993). The social practice of literacy in a program of study abroad. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, State College.
66. Kouritzin, S. (2000). Immigrant mothers redefine access to ESL classes: Contradiction and ambivalence. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21, 14-32.
67. Kuzmic, J. J. (2000). Textbooks, knowledge, and masculinity. In N. Lesko (Ed.), Masculinities in school. (pp 105-225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 45-80.
69. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
70. Lin, A. & Luk, J. (in press). Local creativity in the face of global domination: Insights of Bakhtin for teaching English for dialogic communication. In J. K. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Contributions of Mikhail Bakhtin to understanding second and foreign language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
71. Litosseliti, L., & Sunderland, J. (2002). Gender identity and discourse analysis. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
72. Livia, A., & Hall, K. (Eds.). (1997). Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
73. Losey, K. M. (1995). Gender and ethnicity as factors in the development of verbal skills in bilingual Mexican American women. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 635-661.
74. Mansfield, N. (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Hathaway. New York: New York University Press.
75. Markee, N. P. P. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of SLA studies. In A. Cohen, S. Gass, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. McElhinny, B. (1993). We all wear the blue: Language, gender, and police work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
77. McKay, S. L., & Wong, S.-L. C. (1996). Multiple discourses, multiple identities: Investment and agency in second-language learning among Chinese adolescent immigrant students. Harvard Educational Review, 66(3), 577-608.
78. McMahill, C. (1997). Communities of resistance: A case study of two feminist English classes in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 612-622.
79. McMahill, C. (2001). Self-expression, gender, and community: A Japanese feminist English class. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (pp. 307-344). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
80. McNamara, T. F. (1997). What do we mean by social identity? Competing frameworks, competing discourses. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 561-567.
81. McNamara, T. F. (1999, July). Validity in language testing: The challenge of Sam Messick's legacy. Messick Memorial Lecture presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium, Tsukuba, Japan.
82. Measor, L., & Sikes, P. (1992). Gender and schools. New York: Cassell.
83. Morgan, B. (1998). The ESL classroom: Teaching, critical practice, and community development. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
84. New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66(1), 60-92.
85. Nichols, P. C. (1999). The role of social networks and the strength of weak ties in changing language policy: Gender neutralization in American English. In T. Hueb-ner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 67-98). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
86. Nieto, S. (Ed.) (2000). Puerto Rican students in U.S. schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 409-430.
88. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. London: Longman.
89. Norton, B., & Pavlenko, A. (Eds.). (2004). Gender and English language learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
90. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
91. Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9-31.
92. Olesen, V. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the millennium. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 215-266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
93. Oxford, R. (1993). Gender differences in styles and strategies for language learning: What do they mean? Should we pay attention? In J. Alatis (Ed.), Strategic interaction and language acquisition: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 541-557). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
94. Pavlenko, A., & Piller, I. (2001). New directions in the study of multilingualism, second language learning, and gender. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, second language learning, and gender (pp. 17-52). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
95. Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I., & Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Multilin-gualism, second language learning, and gender. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
96. Pease-Alvarez, L., & Schecter, S. R. (Eds.). (In press). Learning, teaching, and community: Contributions of situated and participatory approaches to educational innovation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Pennycook, A. (1994). Critical pedagogical approaches to research. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 690-693.
98. Philips, S. U. (1980). Sex differences and language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 523-544.
99. Philips, S. U., Steele, S., & Tanz, C. (Eds.). (1987). Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
100. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
101. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., Berducci, D., & Newman, J. (1992). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 343-376.
102. Pierce, B. N., (1995). The theory of methodology in qualitative research. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 569-576.
103. Polanyi, L. (1995). Language learning and living abroad: Stories from the field. In B. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 271-291). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
104. Rehman, B., & Hernandez, D. (Eds.) (2002). Colonize this: Young women of color on today's feminism. New York: Seal.
105. Rivera, K. M. (1999). From developing one's voice to making oneself heard: Affecting language policy from the bottom up. In T. Huebner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA (pp. 333-346). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
106. Saft, S., & Ohara, Y. (2004). Promoting critical reflection about gender in EFL classes at a Japanese university. In B. Norton & A. Pavlenko (Eds.), Gender and English language learners (pp. 143-154). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
107. Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. New York: Longman.
108. Skilton-Sylvester, E. (1997). Inside, outside, and in-between: Identities, literacies, and educational policies in the lives of Cambodian women and girls in Philadelphia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
109. Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2000, March). Getting framed: How home and educational contexts shape the identity options and (bi)literate development of Cambodian refugee women and girls. In A. Yamashiro (Chair), Gender and language: Bridging theoretical approaches, pedagogical implications, and professional development. Symposium conducted at the American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
110. Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2002). Should I stay or should I go?: Investigating Cambodian women's participation and investment in adult ESL programs. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 9-26.
111. Stoltenberg, J. (2000). Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. London: UCL.
112. Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
113. Sunderland, J. (1992). Gender in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 46, 81-91.
114. Sunderland, J. (1994). Exploring gender: Implications for English language education. New York: Prentice Hall.
115. Sunderland, J. (1995). "We're boys, Miss!": Finding gendered identities and looking for gendering of identities in the foreign language classroom. In S. Mills (Ed.), Language and gender: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 160-178). London: Longman.
116. Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching 33, 203-223.
117. Tannen, D. (1996). Researching gender-related patterns in classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 341-344.
118. Tannen, D. (1993). Introduction. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 3-13). New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
119. Thomas, W., & Collier, V. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students' long-term academic achievement: Final report. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, & Excellence.
120. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
121. Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (Eds.). (1983). Language, gender, and society. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
122. Toohey, K., & Scholefield, A. (1994). "Her mouth windful of speech": Gender and the English as a second language classroom. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 12, 1-14.
123. Valdés, G. (1998). The world inside and outside schools: Language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4-18.
124. Valdés, G., & Figueroa, R. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
125. Vandrick, S. (1994). Feminist pedagogy and ESL. College ESL, 4(2), 69-92.
126. Vandrick, S. (1995). Teaching and practicing feminism in the university ESL class. TESOL Journal, 4(3), 4-6.
127. Walker-Moffat, W. (1995). The other side of the Asian American success story. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
128. Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2001, October). Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA. Plenary talk presented at the 4th Pacific Language Research Forum (PacSLRF), University of Hawai'i, Manoa.
129. Weiler, K. (1996). Myths of Paulo Freire. Educational Theory, 46, 353-371.
130. Weinstein, G. (1992). Stories to tell our children. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
131. Weinstein, G. (1999). Learners' lives as curriculum: Six journeys to immigrant literacy. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems.
132. Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: An ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 473-503.
133. Willett, J. (1996). Research as a gendered practice. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 344-347.
134. Willett, J., Solsken, J., & Wilson-Keenan, J. (1999). The (im)possibilities of constructing multicultural language practices in research and pedagogy. Linguistics and Education, 10(2), 165-218.
135. Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Research Council.
136. Wilson-Keenan, J., Solsken, J., & Willett, J. (1998). "Only boys can jump high": Reconstructing gender relations in a first/second grade classroom. In B. Kamler (Ed.), Constructing gender and difference: Critical research perspectives on early childhood (pp. 33-70). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
137. Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and discourse. London: Sage.
138. Wong, S. (in press). Dialogic approaches to teaching English to speakers of other languages: Where the gingko tree grows. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
139. Yates, L. (2000). The "facts of the case": Gender equity for boys as a public policy issue. In N. Lesko (Ed.), Masculinities in school (pp. 305-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.