Cell proliferation of squamous epithelium in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Correlations with clinical, endoscopic and morphological data

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 637-645

  Mastracci, L ^a   Grillo, F ^a   Zentilin, P ^a   Spaggiari, P ^a   Dulbecco, P ^a   Pigozzi, S ^a   Savarino, V ^a   Fiocca, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KI 67 ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIGEN DETECTION; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE MARKER; ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY; ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY; ESOPHAGUS MANOMETRY; ESOPHAGUS MUCOSA; ESOPHAGUS PH; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; GASTROINTESTINAL BIOPSY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS; SAMPLE SIZE; SQUAMOUS EPITHELIUM; TISSUE SECTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33846969845     PISSN: 02692813     EISSN: 13652036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03243.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Quigley EM. 24-h pH monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease: already standard but not yet gold? Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 1071-5.
2. Tobey NA, Carson JL, Alkiek RA, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces: a morphological feature of acid reflux-damaged human esophageal epithelium. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 1200-5.
3. Solcia E, Villani L, Luinetti O, et al. Altered intercellular glycoconjugates and dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in reflux disease. Virchows Arch 2000; 436: 207-16.
4. Villanacci V, Grigolato GP, Cestari R, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces as markers of reflux disease: histology, semiquantitative score and morphometry upon light microscopy. Digestion 2001; 64: 1-8.
5. Vieth M, Peitz U, Labenz J, et al. What parameters are relevant for the histological diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease without Barrett's mucosa? Dig Dis 2004; 22: 196-201.
6. Zentilin P, Savarino V, Mastracci L, et al. Reassessment of the diagnsotic value of histology in patients with GERD, using multiple biopsy sites and an appropriate control group. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2299-306.
7. Dent J. Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in non-erosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 4-16.
8. Ismail-Beigi F, Horton PF, Pope CE. Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man. Gastroenterology 1970; 58: 163-74.
9. Collins BJ, Helliot H, Sloan JM, et al. Oesophageal histology in reflux oesophagitis. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 1265-72.
10. Gerdes J, Li L, Schlueter C, et al. Immunobiochemical and molecular biologic characterization of the cell proliferation-associated nuclear antigen that is defined by monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Am J Pathol 1991; 138: 867-73.
11. Haber MM, Lu L, Modi A, et al. Use of MIB-1 in the assessment of esophageal biopsy specimens from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in well and poorly oriented areas. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2002; 10: 128-33.
12. Carlsson R, Dent J, Bolling-Sternevald E, et al. The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998; 33: 1023-9.
13. Zentilin P, Conio M, Mele MR, et al. Comparison of the main esophageal pathophysiological characteristics between short- and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 893-8.
14. Mela GS, Savarino V, Vigneri S. Optimizing the information obtained from continuous 24-hour gastric pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 961-6.
15. Johnson LF, DeMeester TR. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus. A quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1974; 62: 325-32.
16. Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM. Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 1982-96.
17. Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, et al. on behalf of the Genval Workshop Group. An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management - the Genval workshop report. Gut 1999; 44 (Suppl. 2): S1-16.
18. Vieth M, Fiocca R, Haringsma J, et al. Radial distribution of dilated intercellular spaces of the esophageal squamous epithelium in patients with reflux disease exhibiting discrete endoscopic lesions. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 208-12.
19. Calabrese C, Fabbri A, Bortolotti M, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces as a marker of oesophageal damage: comparative results in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with or without bile reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 525-32.
20. Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et al. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and non-acid gastroesophageal reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1599-606.
21. Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S, et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy. A multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Gut 2006; 55: 1398-402.
22. Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004; 53: 1024-31.
23. Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Savarino E, et al. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH-metry: a novel technique to improve detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux literature review. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36: 565-9.