Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: Review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux

Gut

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1024-1031

  Sifrim, D ^a,b   Castell, D ^c   Dent, J ^d   Kahrilas, P J ^e  

^a Faculty of Medicine   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d ROYAL ADELAIDE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACIDITY; ALKALINITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ESOPHAGUS PH; EVALUATION; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; INTESTINE PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; PATIENT MONITORING; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETER; STOMACH ABSORPTION; STOMACH CONTENT; STOMACH PH; STOMACH POTENTIAL; STOMACH PRESSURE;

ADULT; BILIRUBIN; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3042616153     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.033290     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Wyman J8, Dent J, Holloway RH. Changes in oesophageal pH associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Are traditional criteria sensitive for detection of reflux? Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:827-32.
2. Dent J, Holloway RH, Toouli J, et al. Mechanisms of lower oesophageal sphincter incompetence in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 1988;29:1020-8.
3. Breumelhof R, Nadorp JH, Akkermans LM, et al. Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology 1990;99:1257-64.
4. Mattioli S, Pilotti V, Felice V, et al. Ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring of esophagus, fundus, and antrum. A new technique for simultaneous study of gastro-esophageal and duodenogastric reflux. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:929-38.
5. Silny J. Intraluminal multiple electrical impedance procedure for measurement of gastro-intestinal motility. J Gastrointest Motil 1991;3:151-62.
6. Bechi P, Paucciani F, Baldini F, et al. Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1297-306.
7. Johnson LF, De Meester TR. Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;1:747-67.
8. Kahrilas PJ, Quigley EM. Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1982-96.
9. Shay S, Bomeli S, Richter J. Multichannel intraluminal impedance accurately detects fasting, recumbent reflux events and their clearing. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2002;283:G376-83.
10. Weusten BL, Akkermans LM, van Berge-Henegouwen GP, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Physiol 1994;266(Pt 1):G357-62.
11. Schindlbeck NE, Ippisch H, Klauser AG, et al. Which pH threshold is best in esophageal pH monitoring? Am J Gastroenterol 1991;86:1138-41.
12. Emde C, Garner A, Blum AL. Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations. Gut 1987;28:1177-88.
13. Ergun GA, Kahrilas PJ. Clinical applications of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1077-89.
14. Dent J. A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement. Gastroenterology 1976;71:263-7.
15. Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, et al. Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 1980;65:256-67.
16. Shi G, Ergun GA, Manka M, et al. Lower esophageal sphincter relaxation characteristics using a sleeve sensor in clinical manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:2373-9.
17. Pouderoux P, Verdier E, Kahrilas PJ. Patterns of esophageal inhibition during swallowing, pharyngeal stimulation, and transient LES relaxation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003;284:G242-7.
18. Omari TI, Barnett CP, Benninga MA, et al. Mechanisms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm and term infants with reflux disease. Gut 2002;51:475-9.
19. Skopnik H, Silny J, Heiber O, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux in infants: evaluation of a new intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996;23:591-8.
20. Sifrim D, Silny J, Holloway RH, et al. Patterns of gas and liquid reflux during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. A study using intraluminal electrical impedance. Gut 1999;44:47-54.
21. Shay S, Richter JE. Direct comparison of impedance, common cavity, and pH probe in detecting daytime GER's and their characteristics. Gastroenterology 2003;124:A534.
22. Nguyen HN, Silny J, Matern S. Multiple intraluminal electrical impedancometry for recording of upper gastrointestinal motility: current results and further implications. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:306-17.
23. Nguyen HN, Silny J, Albers D, et al. Dynamics of esophageal bolus transport in healthy subjects studied using multiple intraluminal impedancometry. Am J Physiol 1997;273(Pt 1):G958-64.
24. Wenzl TG, Silny J, Schenke S, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory phenomena in infants: status of the intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999;28:423-8.
25. Wenzl TG, Moroder C, Trachterna M, et al. Esophageal pH monitoring and impedance measurement: a comparison of two diagnostic tests for gastro-esophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002;34:519-23.
26. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, et al. Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hr pH-Impedance recordings. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1588-98.
27. Shay S, Tutuian R, Vela M, et al. Twenty-four hour ambulatory multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: A multicenter report of normal values from 45 healthy volunteers. Gastroenterology 2002;122:A577.
28. Vela M, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et al. Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastro-esophageal reflux: Effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1599-606.
29. Vela MF, Tutuian R, Katz PO, et al. Baclofen decreases acid and non-acid post-prandial gastro-oesophageal reflux measured by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:243-51.
30. Srinivasan R, Vela MF, Katz PO, et al. Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII): A highly sensitive technique to detect small intraesophageal volumes. Gastroenterology 2000;118(Pt 1, suppl 2):2636.
31. Fletcher J, Henry EB, Wirz A, et al. Short segment acid reflux: Markedly increased acid load on distal esophagus revealed by novel pHmetry. Gastroenterology 2000;118(suppl 2):A448.
32. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Tack J, et al. Impedance patterns at the gastro-esophageal junction and distal esophagus in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2000;118:A489.
33. Sifrim D, Holloway R, Silny J, et al. Composition of the postprandial refluxate in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:647-55.
34. Shay SS, Vela M, Richter J. Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) detects reflux events (RE) during the vulnerable period after a swallow that are missed by pH probe and manometry. Gastroenterology 2002;122(suppl 1):T1120.
35. Zhang X, Silny J, Tack J, et al. Effect of acute esophagitis on basal esophageal intraluminal electric impedance. Gastroenterology 2003;124:A534.
36. Bechi P, Pucciani F, Baldini F, et al. Long-term ambulatory enterogastric reflux monitoring. Validation of a new fiberoptic technique. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1297-306.
37. Vaezi MF, LaCamera RG, Richter JE. Validation studies of Bilitec 2000: an ambulatory duodenogastric reflux monitoring system. Am J Physiol 1994;267:G1050-7.
38. Vaezi MF, Singh S, Richter JE. Role of acid and duodenogastric reflux in esophageal mucosal injury: a review of animal and human studies. Gastroenterology 1995;108:1897-907.
39. Champion G, Richter JE, Vaezi MF, et al. Duodenogastro-esophageal reflux: relationship to pH and importance in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 1994;107:747-54.
40. Caldwell MTP, Lawlor P, Byrne PJ, et al. Ambulatory oesophageal bile monitoring in Barrett's oesophagus. Br J Surg 1995;82:657-60.
41. Kauer WKH, Burdiles P, Ireland AP, et al. Does duodenal juice reflux into the esophagus of patients with complicated GERD? Evaluation of a fiberoptic sensor for bilirubin. Am J Surg 1995;169:98-103.
42. Barrett MW, Myers JC, Watson DI, et al. Dietary interference with the use of Bilitec to assess bile reflux. Dis Esophagus 1999;12:60-4.
43. Koek GH, Tack J, Sifrim D, et al. The role of acid and duodenal gastro-esophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2033-40.
44. Weusten BL, Roelofs JM, Akkermans LM, et al. Objective determination of pH thresholds in the analysis of 24 h ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring. Eur J Clin Invest 1996;26:151-8.
45. Shay SS, Richter JE. Importance of additional reflux events during esophageal acid clearing. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:95-102.
46. Mittal RK, Lange RC, McCallum RW. Identification and mechanism of delayed esophageal acid clearance in subjects with hiatus hernia. Gastroenterology 1987;92:130-5.
47. Kahrilas PJ. Anatomy and physiology of the gastroesophageal junction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1997;26:467-86.
48. Penagini R, Bartesaghi B, Bianchi PA. Accuracy of the traditional pH criterion for gastro-esophageal reflux. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1992;4:813-16.
49. Washington N, Moss HA, Washington C, et al. Non-invasive detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux using an ambulatory system. Gut 1993;34:1482-6.
50. Katz PO. Review article: the role of non-acid reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000;14:1539-51.