Reaching for new perspectives on socio-ecological systems: Exploring the possibilities for adaptive co-management in the Swedish mountain region

International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 359-369

  Willebrand, Tomas ^a   Sandström, Camilla ^b   Lundgren, Tommy ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive co management; Natural resources; Swedish mountains

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; COMANAGEMENT; LEARNING; MOUNTAIN REGION; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; STAKEHOLDER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 33846905211     PISSN: 17451590     EISSN: 17451604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17451590609618157     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andersson J. The development of resource polymorphism - Effects of diet, predation risk and population dynamical feedbacks. Umeå: Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 2005
2. Bergström R, Huldt H and Nilsson T. Swedish Game - biology and management. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell; 1992
3. Berkes F and Folke C (eds) Linking Social and Ecological Systems, Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998
4. Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL and Thomas L. Advanced Distance Sampling. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press; 2004
5. Carlsson L and Berkes F. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 2005;75:65-76
6. Danell K, Bergström R, Duncan P and Pastor J. Large Herbivore Ecology, Ecosystem Dynamics and Conservation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2006
7. Fell T. The Sources of Local Conflicts in Hunting Policy: An Investigation of Game Keeping Associations in the County of Norrbotten, Sweden. PhD Thesis. Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden; 2006
8. Fell PT. Legitimacy and Conflict - Explaining tensions in local Swedish hunting policy. Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Division of Political Science; 2006:18
9. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P and Norberg N. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2005;30:441-73
10. Skr. En samlad naturvårdspolitik. 2001/2002:173. Swedish Environmental Protection Board; 2002
11. Hartwick JM. National Accounting and Capital. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar; 2000
12. Hartwick JM. National accounting with natural and other types of capital. Environmental and Resource Economics 2001;19:329-41
13. Heal G and Kriström B. National income and the environment. In Mäler K-G and Vincent J (eds). Handbook of Environmental Economics. New York: North-Holland; 2002
14. Hilborn R and Mangel M. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1997
15. Hultkrantz L. National account of timber and forest environmental resources in Sweden. Environmental and Resource Economics 1992;2:283-305
16. Lande R, Engen S and Saether B-E. Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003
17. Ludwig D, Mangel M and Haddad B. Ecology, conservation and public policy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2001;32:481-517
18. Lundgren T. Measuring Regional Welfare Considering Natural and Cultural Resources. Economics Discussion Papers, No. 0510. Dunedin, New Zealand: Department of Economics, University of Otago; 2005
19. Lundmark L. Restructuring and Employment Change in Sparsely Populated Areas, Examples from Northern Sweden and Finland. Umeå: Gerum Kulturgeografi, Kulturgeografiska institutionen/SMC, Umeå University 2006:2
20. Mäler KG. National accounts and environmental resources. Environmental and Resource Economics 1991;1:1-15
21. Nicolson CR, Starfield AM, Kofinas GP and Kruse JA. Ten heuristics for interdisciplinary modeling projects. Ecosystems 2002;5:376-84
22. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990
23. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press 2005
24. Pinkerton E. Towards specificity in complexity: Understanding co-managememt from a social science perspective. In Wilson DC et al. (eds). The Fisheries Co-management Experience, Accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects. London UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003
25. Proposition 2000:01/57. En samlad rovdjurspolitik, Sveriges regering; 2000
26. Throsby D. Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics 1999;23:3-12
27. Regan HM, Colyvan M and Burgman MA. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecological Applications 2002;12:618-28
28. Rådelius C. Självstyre eller samförvaltning? Problem och möjligheter utifrån en studie av världsarvet Laponia. Licentiatuppsats, Luleå Tekniska Universitet; 2002
29. Reynolds JD, Mace GM, Redford KH and Robison JG. Conservation of Exploited Species. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001
30. Sandström C and Lindvall A. Regional förvaltning av rovdjur i Västerbotten och Norrbotten - om likheter och skillnader ur ett samförvaltningsperspektiv. Umeå: FjällMistrarapport 2006;18
31. Sibley RM, Hone J and Clutton-Brock TH. Wildlife Population Growth Rates. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003
32. SOU. En samlad naturvårdspolitik. Stockholm 2001/2002:177
33. SOU. Jakt och fiske I samverkan. Slutbetänkande av jakt-och fiskerättsutredningen. Statens Offentliga Utrednigar; 2005:116
34. Turchin P. Complex population dynamics: a theoretical/empirical synthesis. Monographs in Population Biology 35. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press; 2003
35. van Eten MJG and Roe E. Ecology, Engineering and Management. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press; 2002
36. Walters C. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Washington, DC: Island Press; 1986
37. Walters CJ and Hillborn R. Adaptive control of fishing systems. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada 1976;33:145-59
38. Walters CJ and Holling CS. Resilience and adaptability in ecological management systems: Why do policy models fail? International Series on Applied Systems Analysis 1984;13
39. Williams BK, Conroy MJ and Nichols JD. Analysis and Management of Animal Populations. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002
40. Williams B. Policy, research and adaptive mangement in avian conservation. AUK 2003;120:212-17
41. Willebrand T and Hörnell M. Understanding the effects of harvesting willow ptarmigan Lagopus lagopus in Sweden. Wildlife Biology 2001;7:205-12
42. Zachrisson A. Co-management of Natural Resources, Paradigm Shifts, Key Concepts and Cases. Umeå: FjällMistrarapport; 2004:1