How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 177-239

  Walton, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

Argumentation schemes; Artificial intelligence; Critical questions; Electronic democracy; Formal dialogue systems; Practical reasoning; Profiles of dialogue

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PROCESSING; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES; CRITICAL QUESTIONS; ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY; FORMAL DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; PRACTICAL REASONING; PROFILES OF DIALOGUES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33846847742     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: 15728382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-006-9025-x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aakhus, M. (2005). The Act and Activity of Proposing in Deliberation, paper presented at the ALTA Conference, August, 2005.
2. Anonymous (no author given) (2005). Weight Ranking on Schools Can Hurt, The Advertiser, September 21, 2005, p. 17.
3. Aristotle (1928). Nicomachean Ethics, in The Works of Aristotle Translated into English, ed. Ross, W. D., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Aristotle (1939). Topics, trans. E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
5. Atkinson, K. (2005). What Should We do? Computational Representation of Persuasive Argument in Practical Reasoning. Ph.D. Thesis, Liverpool, University of Liverpool.
6. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004). Justifying Practical Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument
7. (CMNA 2004), 87-90. ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain.
8. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004a). PARMENIDES: Facilitating Democratic Debate, Electronic Government. In Traunmuller, R. (ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 3183. Third International Conference on eGovernment (EGOV 2004), DEXA 2004, Zaragoza, Spain.
9. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2004b). A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action. In Rahwan, I., Moraitis, P., and Reed, C. (eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 149-161. Springer: Berlin.
10. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2005). Agent Decision Making Using Argumentation About Actions, Technical Report ULCS-05-006. Computer Science Department: University of Liverpool.
11. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2005a). Persuasive Political Argument. In Grasso, F., Reed, C., and Kibble, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2005), 44-45. Edinburgh, Scotland.
12. Bach, K. (1998). Speech Acts. In Craig, E. (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://www.online.sfsu.edu/-kbach/spchacts.html.
13. Barnes, J. (1980). Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34, 490-511.
14. Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, Plans and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.
15. Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J., and Pollack, M. E. (1988). Plans and Resource-bounded Practical Reasoning, Computational Intelligence 4, 349-355.
16. Burke, N. (2005). Weight Watch Plan to Provide Details of a Child's Fitness, The Advertiser, September 17, 2005, p. 2.
17. Fisher, R., Ury, W., and Patton, B. (1983). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Penguin Books: New York.
18. Gordon, T. F. (1995). The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
19. Gordon, T. F. and Karacapilidis, N. (1997). The Zeno Argumentation Framework. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 10-18. Melbourne, Australia.
20. Gordon, T. F. and Richter, G. (2002). Discourse Support Systems for Deliberative Democracy: In Traunmuller, R. and Lenk, L. (ed), eGovernment: State of the Art and Perspectives (EGOV). Springer Verlag, Aix-en-Provence, 248-255.
21. Gordon, T. F. and Walton, D. (2005). Critical Questions in Computational Models of Legal Argument, International Workshop on Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence and Law, 103-111. IAAIL Workshop Series, Wolf Legal Publishers.
22. Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. Methuen: London.
23. Hamblin, C. L. (1987). Imperatives. Blackwell: Oxford.
24. Hitchcock, D. (2002). Pollock on Practical Reasoning, Informal Logic 22, 247-256.
25. Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., and Parsons, P. (2005). A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues, Argument and Its Applications. In Hansen, H. V., Tindale, C. W., Blair, J. A., and Johnson, R. H. (eds.) (2001), Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA 2001).
26. Also available on Peter McBurney's web page (2005) at the University of Liverpool, Department of Computer Science: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~peter/.
27. Horty, J. and Belnap, N. D. (1995). The Deliberative Stit: A Study of Action, Omission, Ability, and Obligation, Journal of Philosophical Logic 24, 583-644.
28. Hulstijn, J. (2000). Dialogue Models for Inquiry and Transaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
29. Jonsen, A. R. and Toulmin, S. (1989). The Abuse of Casuistry. University of California Press: Berkeley.
30. Kauffeld, F. J. (1995). The Persuasive Force of Arguments on Behalf of Proposals, Amsterdam, SicSat, Analysis and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. 2.
31. Kauffeld, F. J. (1998). Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing, Argumentation 12, 245-266.
32. Krabbe, E. C. W. (1999). Profiles of Dialogue: In Gerbrandy, J., Marx, M., de Rijke, M., and Venema, Yde (eds.), JFAK: Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday. Amsterdam University Press Amsterdam, 25-36.
33. Krabbe, E. C. W. (2005). Fundamental Circularities in the Theory of Argumentation: In Hitchcock, D. and Farr, D. (eds.), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18-21 May, 2005. Hamilton, Ontario, 286-294.
34. Lascher, E. L. (1999). The Politics of Automobile Insurance Reform: Ideas, Institutions, and Public Policy in North America. Georgetown University Press: Washington.
35. Paglieri, F. and Castelfranchi, C. (2005). Arguments as Belief Structures: In Hitchcock, D. (ed), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University 18-21 May, 2005. Hamilton, Ontario, 356-367.
36. Pollock J. L. (1994). Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence 67: 377-407.
37. Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.
38. Prakken, H., Reed, C., and Walton D. (2005). Dialogues about the Burden of Proof. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 115-124, Held June 6-11, 2005. The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): Bologna, Italy, New York.
39. Reed, C. (1998). Dialogue Frames in Agent Communication. In Demazeau, Y. (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 246-253. IEEE Press.
40. Reed, C. and Norman, T. J. (2003). Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
41. Reed, C. and Rowe, G. (2002). Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML, Technical Report, Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee. Available at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/ creed/araucaria/.
42. Reed, C. and Rowe, G. (2002). Araucaria, Version 3, User Manual. Available at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria/.
43. Reed, C. and Walton, D. (2003). Diagramming Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions. In van Eemeren, F. H., Blair, A.J., Willard C. A., and Henkemans, F. S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, 881-885. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
44. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
45. Searle, J. (2001). Rationality in Action. The MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.
46. Segerberg, K. (1984). Towards an Exact Philosophy of Action, Topoi 3, 75-83.
47. Singh, M. P. (1999). A Semantics for Speech Acts, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 8, 47-71.
48. Singh, M. P. (1997). Commitments in the Architecture of a Limited, Rational Agent: In Cavedon, L. (ed), Intelligent Agents Systems: Theoretical and Practical Issues. SpringerBerlin, 72-87,
49. Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (1997). Abstract Argumentation Systems, Artificial Intelligence 90, 225-279.
50. Wright, G. H.von (1972). On So-Called Practical Inference, Acta Sociologica 15, 39-53.
51. Walton, D. (1990). Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, Knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation. Rowman & Littlefield: Savage, Maryland.
52. Walton, D. (1990a). What is Reasoning? What is an Argument? Journal of Philosophy 87, 399-419.
53. Walton, D. (1996) Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N.J.
54. Walton D. (1998). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press: Toronto.
55. Walton, D. (2003). Is There a Burden of Questioning? Artificial Intelligence and Law 11, 1-43.
56. Walton, D. (2004). Criteria of Rationality for Evaluating Democratic Public Rhetoric. In Fontana, B., Nederman, C. J., and Reimer, G. (eds.), Talking Democracy University Park, 295-330. Penn Sate Press.
57. Walton, D. (2005). Evaluating Practical Reasoning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Norms, Knowledge and Reasoning in Technology Held at Huis Elzendaal, Boxmeer, the Netherlands, June 3-4, 2005. Eindhoven, Technical University of Eindhoven.
58. Walton, D. and Godden, D. (2005). The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes, The Uses of Argument. In Hitchcock, D. and Farr, D. (eds.), Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 476-484. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
59. Walton, D. and Krabbe, E. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue. State University of New York Press: Albany.
60. Wooldridge, M. (2000). Reasoning about Rational Agents. The MIT Press: Cambridge Mass.
61. Wooldridge, M. (2002). An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. Wiley: Chichester.
62. Yankelovich, D. (1992). A Widening Expert/Public Opinion Gap, 20-27, Challenge, May-June, 1992.