CO2 benefit from the increasing percentage of diesel passenger cars in Sweden

International Journal of Energy Research

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 192-203

  Zervas, Efthimios ^a   Lazarou, Christos ^b,c  

^a INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INSTITUTE   (Greece)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

^c NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; Diesel; Gasoline; Passenger cars; Sweden

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; DIESEL ENGINES; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GASOLINE; PASSENGER CARS;

DIESEL PASSENGER CAR; MARKET SEGMENTATION;

EMISSION CONTROL;

CARBON DIOXIDE; DIESEL ENGINES; EMISSION CONTROL; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GASOLINE; PASSENGER CARS;

EID: 33846834044     PISSN: 0363907X     EISSN: 1099114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/er.1244     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 2 emissions. Energy Policy 26(3):159-166.
2. Highway Diesel Progress Review, USEPA, Washington, June 2002, http://www.epa.gov/air/caaac/Dieselreview.pdf
3. Internet site of the Association of European Automobile Manufactures (ACEA), www.acea.be
4. Internet site of the Comity of French Automobile Manufactures (CCFA), www.ccfa.fr
5. Internet site of Deutsche Gegellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ), www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/en-International_Fuel_Prices_2005.pdf
6. Internet site of Eurostat, europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat/
7. Internet site of the German Federal Motoring Authority (KBA), www.kba.de
8. Internet site of the International Road Federation, www.irfnet.org
9. Internet site of Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2003), http://www.naturvardsverket.se/dokument/fororen/utslapp/fcccdata/2003.pdf
10. Internet site of Swedish Petroleum Institute, www.spi.se
11. Internet site of Swedish Statistics Net, www.svenskstatistik.net
12. Internet site of the World Resources Institute, earthtrends.wri.org
13. Johnson TV. 2003. Diesel emission control in review. The last 12 months. SAE Technical Paper Series 2003-01-0039.
14. Kram T, Morita T, Riahi K, Roehrl RA, Van Rooijen S, Sankovski A, De Vries B. 2000. Global and regional greenhouse gas emissions scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63(2-3):335-371.
15. Lambert C, Hammerle R, McGill R, Khair M, Sharp C. 2004. Technical advantages of urea SCR for light-duty and heavy-duty diesel vehicle applications. SAE Technical Paper Series 2004-01-1292.
16. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
17. Panorama of Transport. 2003. Statistical Overview of Transport in European Union, European Union, Brussels, http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DA-04-001-2/EN/ KS-DA-04-001-2-EN.PDF
18. Stamatelos AM. 1997. A review of the effect of particulate traps on the efficiency of vehicle Diesel engines. Energy Conversion Management 38:83.
19. 2 emission benefit of diesel (versus Gasoline) powered vehicles. Environmental Science and Technology 38(12):3217-3223.
20. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997. United Nations, Kyoto, Japan. http://unfccc.int/essential_background/ kyoto_protocol/background/items/1351.php
21. Zervas E, Dorlhène P, Forti L, Perrin C, Momique JC, Monier R, Ing H, Lopez B. 2005. Inter-laboratory test of exhaust PM using ELPI. Aerosol Science and Technology 39:333-346.
22. Zervas E, Dorlhène P, Daviau R, Dionnet B. 2004. Repeatability of fine particle measurement on Diesel and gasoline exhaust gas, SAE Technical Paper Series 2004-01-1983.
23. 2 emissions change from the increasing percentage of Diesel passenger cars in Norway. Energy and Fuels 19:1919-1926.