Evaluation of the RAPD profiles from different body parts of Euglossa pleosticta Dressler male bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Euglossina)

Neotropical Entomology

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 811-817

  Pascual, Amália N T ^a   Suzuki, Karen M ^a   Almeida, Fernanda S ^a   Sodré, Leda M K ^a   Sofia, Silvia H ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF LONDRINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Apoidea; Euglossine bee; Euglossini; Molecular marker; Orchid bee

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; GENETICS; MALE; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA;

ANIMALS; BEES; MALE; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE;

APIDAE; APOIDEA; EUGLOSSA; EUGLOSSINI; HEXAPODA; HYMENOPTERA;

EID: 33846798317     PISSN: 1519566X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1519-566X2006000600014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayliffe, M.A,. G.J. Lawrence, J.G. Ellis & A.J. Prior. 1994. Heteroduplex molecules formed between allelic sequences cause nonparental RAPD bands. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 1632-1636.
2. Bickham, J.W., S. Sandhu, P.D.N. Hebert, L. Chickhi & R. Athwal. 2000. Effects of chemical contaminants on genetic diversity in natural populations: Implications for biomonitoring and ecotoxicology. Mutat. Res. 463: 33-51.
3. Carvalho, A.O.R. & L.G.E. Vieira. 2001. Determinação das condições ótimas para análises de PCR-RAPD em Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel (Hymenopera: Formicidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 30: 593-600.
4. Chapman, R.F. 1982. The insects: Structure and function, 3rd ed. London, Hodder and Stoughton Ltd., 934p.
5. Chiappero, M.B. & C.N. Gardenal. 2001. Inheritance of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD-PCR) markers and their use in population studies of Calomys musculinus (Rodentia, Muridae), the reservoir of Argentine Hemorrhagic Fever. Hereditas (Lund) 135: 85-93.
6. Coelho, A.S.G. 2000. BOOD: Avaliação de dendrogramas baseados em estimativas de distâncias/similaridades genéticas através do procedimento de bootstrap. Software, Goiânia, UFG.
7. Dodson, C.H. 1966. Ethology of some bees of the tribe Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 39: 607-629.
8. Hadrys, H., M. Balick & B. Schierwater. 1992. Applications of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol. 1: 55-63.
9. Harper, G.L., N. McClean & D. Goulson. 2003. Microsatellite markers to assess the influence of population size, isolation and demographic change in the genetic structure of the UK butterfly Polyommatus bellargus. Mol. Ecol. 12: 3349-3357.
10. Hillis, D.M., C. Moritz & B.K. Mable (eds). 1996. Molecular systematics, 2nd ed. Sunderland, Cumbria, Sinauer Associates, Inc., 655p.
11. Hunt, G.J. & and R.E. Page Jr. 1992. Patterns of inheritance with RAPD molecular markers reveal novel types of polymorphism in the honey bee. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 15-20.
12. Keyghobadi, N., J. Roland & C. Strobeck. 2005. Genetic differentiation and gene flow among populations of the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, vary with landscape connectivity. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1897-1909.
13. KjØlner, S., S.M. Såstad, P. Taberlet & C. Brochmann. 2004. Amplified fragment length polymorphism versus random amplified polymorphic DNA markers: Clonal diversity in Saxifraga cernua. Mol. Ecol. 13: 81-86.
14. Martin, G.B., J.G.K. Williams & and S.D. Tanskley. 1991. Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near-isogenic lines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88: 2336-2340.
15. Pérez, T., J.A. Albornoz & A. Domênguez. 1998. An evaluation of RAPD fragment reproducibility and nature. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1347-1357.
16. Rabouam, C., A.M. Comes, V. Bretagnolle, J-F. Humbert, G. Periquet & Y. Bigot. 1999. Features of DNA fragments obtained by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assays. Mol. Ecol. 8: 493-503.
17. Rohlf, F.J. 2000. NTSYSpc, numeral taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1. Exeter Software, Applier Biostatistics, Setauket, New York.
18. Siegel, S. 1981. Estatística não-paramétrica: Para as ciências do comportamento. São Paulo, Ed. McGraw-Hill do Brasil, Ltda., 350p.
19. Sneath, P.H.A. & R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco, California, WH Freeman, 573p.
20. Sofia, S.H. F.M. Paula, A.M. Santos, F.S. Almeida & L.M.K. Sodré. 2005. Genetic structure analysis of Eufriesea violacea (Hymenoptera, Apidae) populations from southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest remnants Genet. Mol. Biol. 28: 479-484.
21. Walker, A.J., L. Ford, M.E.N. Majerus, I.E. Geoghegan, N. Birch, J.A. Gatehouse & A.M.R. Gatehouse. 1998. Characterisation of the mid-gut digestive proteinase activity of the two-spot ladybird (Adalia bipuntacta L.) and its sensitivity to proteinase inhibitors. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 28: 173-180.
22. Watts, P.C., R. Rouquette, I.J. Saccheri, S.J. Kemp & D.J. Thompson. 2004. Molecular and ecological evidence for small-scale isolation by distance in an endangered damselfly, Coenagrium mercuriale. Mol. Ecol. 13: 2931-2945.
23. Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.L. Livak & S.V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535.
24. Winston, M.L. 1987. The biology of the honeybee. Cambridge, Massachussets, Harvard University Press, 281p.