Commodity checkoff programs as alternative producer investment opportunities: The case of soybeans

Agribusiness

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 539-552

  Williams, Gary W ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846671838     PISSN: 07424477     EISSN: 15206297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6297(199923)15:4<539::AID-AGR9>3.0.CO;2-N     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barry, P.J., Ellinger, P.N., Hopkin, J.A., &Baker, C.B., (1995).Financial management in agriculture (5th ed.).Danville, IL: Interstate Publishers, Inc.
2. Bredahl, M.E., Meyers, W.H., & Collins, K.J., (1979).The elasticity of foreign demand for U.S. agricultural products: The importance of the price transmission elasticity.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 59-63.
3. Brester, G.W., & Schroeder, T.C., (1995).The impacts of brand and generic advertising on meat demand.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 969-979.
4. Brundy, J.M., & Jorgenson, D.W., (1971).Efficient estimation of simultaneous equations by instrumental variables.Review of Economics and Statistics, 207-224.
5. Capps, O., Jr., Bessler, D.A., Davis, G.C., & Nichols, J.P., (1996).Economic evaluation of the cotton checkoff program. InJ.L.Ferrero & C.Clary (Eds.), Economic evaluation of commodity promotion programs in the current legal and political environment, NEC-63 and NICPRE (pp. 119-55), Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
6. Capps, O., Jr., Seo, S.-C., & Nichols, J.P., (1997).On the estimation of advertising effects for branded products: An application to spaghetti sauces.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, 291-302.
7. Carman, H.F., & Green, R.D., (1993).Commodity supply response to a producer-financed advertising program: The california avocado industry.Agribusiness, 9, 605-621.
8. Chang, H.-S., & Kinnucan, H.W., (1991).Economic effects of an advertising excise tax.Agribusiness, 7, 165-71.
9. Jones, E., &Choi, Y., (1992).Advertising of fresh and processed potato products. InH.W.Kinnucan, S.R.Thompson, &H.Chang (Eds.), Commodity advertising and promotion (pp. 193-205), Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
10. Kinnucan, H.W., & Christian, J.E., (1997).A method for measuring returns to nonprice export promotion with application to almonds.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22, 120-32.
11. Kinnucan, H.W., & Miao, Y., (1999).Media-specific returns to generic advertising: The case of catfish.Agribusiness, 15, 81-99.
12. Kinnucan, H.W., Nelson, R.G., & Xiao, H., (1995).Cooperative advertising rent dissipation.Marine Resource Economics, 10, 373-384.
13. Kinnucan, H.W., & Venkateswaran, M., (1991).Economic effectiveness of advertising aquacultural products.Journal of Applied Acuaculture, 1, 3-31.
14. Kloek, T., & Mennes, L., (1960).Simultaneous equations estimation based on principal components of predetermined variables, Econometrica, 28, 45-61.
15. Mitchell, D.W., & Speaker, P.J., (1986).A simple, flexible distributed lag technique: The polynomial inverse lag.Journal of Econometrics, 31, 329-340.
16. Nerlove, M., & Waugh, F., (1961).Advertising without supply control: Some implications of a study of the advertising of oranges.Journal of Farm Economics, 43, 813-37.
17. Reberte, J.C., Schmit, T.M., &Kaiser, H.M., (1996).An ex post evaluation of generic egg advertising in the U.S. InJ.L.Ferrero & C.Clary (Eds.), Economic evaluation of commodity promotion programs in the current legal and political environment, NEC-63 and NICPRE (pp. 83-95), Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
18. Richards, T.J., Van Ispelen, P., & Kagan, A., (1997).A two-stage analysis of the effectiveness of promotion programs for U.S. apples.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 825-827.
19. Schmit, T.M., Reberte, J.C., &Kaiser, H.M., (1996).An economic analysis of generic egg advertising in California, 1985-1995. InJ.L.Ferrero & C.Clary (Eds.), Economic evaluation of commodity promotion programs in the current legal and political environment, NEC-63 and NICPRE (pp. 103-115), Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
20. Sellen, D., Goddard, E., & Duff, S., (1997).Returns from research and advertising in the north American hog and pork industry. In J.Ferrero, C.Clary, & T.J.Richards (Eds.), Economic analysis of research and promotion, NEC-63 and NICPRE (pp. 5-27), New Orleans, LA.
21. Texas Agricultural Market Research Center (TAMRC).(1998a).Soybean checkoff investments: Domestic promotion expenditures, 1979-1996.Texas Agricultural Market Research Center Information Report No. IR 3-98, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
22. Texas Agricultural Market Research Center (TAMRC).(1998b).Soybean checkoff investments: Foreign market development expenditures, 1970-1996.Texas Agricultural Market Research Center Information Report No. IR 1-98, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
23. Texas Agricultural Market Research Center (TAMRC).(1998c).World soybean and corn database.Texas Agricultural Market Research Center Information Report No. IR1-97, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
24. Ward, R.W., & Lambert, C., (1993).Generic promotion of beef: Measuring the impact of the U.S. beef checkoff.Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44, 456-465.
25. Ward, R.W., & Forker, O.D., (1991).Washington apple advertising: An economic model of its impact.Washington Apple Commission Report No. WAC 91:1, University of Florida, Gainesville.
26. Williams, G.W., (1985).Returns to U.S. soybean export market development.Agribusiness, 1, 243-263.
27. Williams, G.W., & Nichols, J.P., (1998).Effectiveness of commodity promotion.Texas Agricultural Market Research Center Consumer and Product Research Report No. CP1-98, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
28. Williams, G.W., Shumway, C.R., Love, H.A., & Ward, J.B., (1998).Effectiveness of the soybean checkoff program.Texas Agricultural Market Research Center Commodity Market Research Report No. CM-2-98, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.