Using e-exercise bases in mathematics: Case studies at university

International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 327-350

  Cazes, Claire ^a   Gueudet, Ghislaine ^b   Hersant, Magali ^c   Vandebrouck, Fabrice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b IUFM de Bretagne   (France)

^c IUFM des Pays de Loire 4   (France)

Author keywords

Analysis of tasks; Didactic analysis; Didactic contract; E exercise base; Milieu; Students' activity; Undergraduate mathematics

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TEACHING;

ANALYSIS OF TASKS; CONTRACT CLAUSES; DIDACTIC ANALYSIS; DIDACTIC CONTRACT; E-EXERCISE BASES (EEB); UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33846668782     PISSN: 13823892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-006-0005-8     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematics Learning 7: 245-274.
2. Bookman, J. and Malone, D. (2003). The nature of learning in Interactive technological environments. A proposal for a research agenda based on grounded theory, Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education V, American Mathematical Society.
3. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970-1990. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Bruillard, E. (1997). Les machines à enseigner. Paris: Hermès.
5. Crowe, W.D. and Zand, H. (2000). Computers and undergraduate mathematics 3: Internet resources. Computers & Education 35(2): 123-147.
6. Douady, R. (1986). Jeux de cadres et dialectique outil-objet, Recherchen en Didactique des Mathématiques:7.2, 5-31, Ed. La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble.
7. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine: registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels, Ed. Peter Lang.
8. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A. (2005). Teaching undergrate mathematics on the internet. Part 1: Technologies and taxonomy. Educational Studies in Mathematics 58: 235-252.
9. Gueudet, G. and Houdebine, J. (2003). Une base d'exercices en ligne à l'université, Actes du colloque ITEM, IUFM de Reims. http://www.reims.iufm.fr/Recherche/ereca/itemcom/.
10. Lagrange, J.-B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C. and Tronche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation, Second international handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 237-269). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Robert, A. (1998). Outils d'analyses des contenus mathématiques à enseigner au lycée et à l'université. Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques 18(2): 139-140.
12. Robert, A. and Rogalski, J. (2005). A cross-analysis of the mathematics teacher's activity. An example in a French 10th-grade class. Educational Studies in Mathematics 59: 269-298.
13. Ruthven, K. and Hennessy, S. (2002). A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics 49(2-3): 47-86.
14. Tall, D and Vinner, S (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics 12: 151-169.
15. Vandebrouck, F. and Cazes, C. (2005). Analyse de fichiers de traces d'étudiants: Aspects didactiques, Revue STICEF, Vol. 12, ISSN: 1764-7223, http://www.sticef.org.