Exercices de style: Developing multiple competencies through a writing portfolio

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 618-639

  Paesani, Kate ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grammar; Literature; Peer review; Process oriented writing; Writing portfolio

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846556747     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02280.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barnett, M. A. (1989a). More than meets the eye. Foreign language reading: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Barnett, M. A. (1989b). Writing as a process. The French Review, 63(1), 31-44.
3. Barson, J. (1996). La grammaire à l'oeuvre [Grammar at Work] (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
4. Byrd, D. R. (2003). Practical tips for implementing peer editing tasks in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 434-441.
5. Byrnes, H. (2001). Articulating foreign language programs: The need for new, curricular bases. In C. G. Lally (Ed.), Foreign language program articulation: Current practice and future prospects (pp.157-180). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
6. Byrnes, H., & Kord, S. (2002). Developing literacy and literary competence: Challenges for foreign language departments. In V. M. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues. AAUSC Issues in Language Program Direction (pp. 35-73). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
7. Byrnes, H., & Maxim, H. H. (2004). Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs. AAUSC issues in language program direction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
8. Camus, A. (1942). L'Étranger [The Stranger]. Paris: Gallimard.
9. Chaplin, C. (Director) (1936). Modern Times [Motion picture]. United States: United Artists.
10. Cheung, S. H. (1995). Poetics to pedagogy: The imagist power of language. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Redefining the boundaries of language study. AAUSC issues in language program direction (pp. 99-122). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
11. Ellis, R. (1992). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
12. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
14. Frantzen, D. (2002). Rethinking foreign language literature: Towards an integration of literature and language at all levels. In V M. Scott & H. Tucker (Eds.), SLA and the literature classroom: Fostering dialogues. AAUSC issues in language program direction (pp. 109130). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
15. Greenia, G. D. (1992). Why Johnny can't escribir: Composition and the foreign language curriculum. ADFL Bulletin, 24(1), 3037.
16. Hedgecock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 255-276.
17. Herman, G. (1985). Adapting Queneau's Exercices de style to classroom use: An experiment in creative writing at the undergraduate level. ADFL Bulletin, 17(1), 44-47.
18. Herman, G. (1986). How to make (French) composition challenging and productive. The French Review, 60(1), 56-64.
19. Herman, G. (1988). Developing logical thinking and sharpening writing skills in advanced composition classes. The French Review, 62(1), 59-66.
20. Hewins, C. (1986). Writing in a foreign language: Motivation and the process approach. Foreign Language Annals, 19, 219-223.
21. Kauffmann, R. A. (1996). Writing to read and reading to write: Teaching literature in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 396-402.
22. Knutson, E. (1997). Reading with a purpose: Communicative reading tasks for the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 49-57.
23. Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse. Modern Language Journal, 69(4), 356-366.
24. Krashen, S. 1984. Writing: Research, theory and applications. Torrance, CA: Laredo.
25. Lee, J. E (2002). Processing Spanish future tense morphology incidentally while reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 55-80.
26. Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers' comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
27. Leow, R. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 82, 49-68.
28. Padilla, A. M., Aninao, J. C., & Sung, H. (1996). Development and implementation of student portfolios in foreign language programs. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 429-438.
29. Paesani, K. (2004). Using literature to develop foreign language proficiency: Toward an interactive classroom. In C. J. Stivale (Ed.), Modern French literary studies: Strategic pedagogies (pp. 13-25). New York: Modern Language Association.
30. Paesani, K. (2005). Literary texts and grammar instruction: Revisiting the inductive presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 15-24.
31. Queneau, R. (1947). Exercices de style. Paris: Gallimard.
32. Queneau, R. (1979). Exercices in style. (B. Wright, Traus.). London: John Calder.
33. Reichelt, M. (1999). Toward a more comprehensive view of L2 writing: Foreign language writing in the U.S.Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 181-204.
34. Reichelt, M. (2001). A critical review of foreign language writing research on pedagogical approaches. Modem Language Journal, 85(4), 578-589.
35. Scott, V. M. (1996). Rethinking foreign language writing. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
36. Semke, H. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
37. Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395-403.
38. Shlayer, J. (2000). Using student portfolios as an assessment tool in second language learning. English Teachers Journal, 53, 34-41.
39. Shook, D. J. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5(2), 57-93.
40. Swaffar, J. K., (1991). Language learning is more than learning language: Rethinking reading and writing tasks in textbooks for beginning language study. In B. E Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 252-279). Lexington, MA: U.C. Heath.
41. Swaffar, J. K. (1998). Major changes: The standards project and the new foreign language curriculum. ADFL Bulletin, 30(1), 34-37.
42. VanPatten, B. (1993). Grammar teaching for the acquisition-rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 435-450.
43. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-244.
44. Williams, J. (2005). Teaching writing in second and foreign language classrooms. Boston: McGraw Hill.
45. Woody, D. B. (2005). Language program articulation from the perspective of the learner: Constructing coherence through the use of a language learning portfolio. In C. M. Barrette & K. Paesani (Eds.), Language program articulation: Developing a theoretical foundation. AAUSC issues in language program direction (pp. 131-148). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
46. Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195-209.