Predicting subsequent citations to articles published in twelve crime-psychology journals: Author impact versus journal impact

Scientometrics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 499-510

  Walters, Glenn D ^a  

^a FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846546567     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0166-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AMIN, M., MABE, M. (2000), Impact factors: Use and abuse, Perspectives in Publishing, 1 : 1-6.
2. CALLAHAM, M., WEARS, R. L., WEBER, E. (2002), Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals, Journal of the American Medical Association, 287 : 2847-2850.
3. COLE, S., COLE, J. R. (1967), Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science, American Sociological Review, 32 : 377-390.
4. FAVA, G. A., GUIDI, J., SONINO, N. (2004), How citation analysis can monitor the progress of research in clinical medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73 : 331-333.
5. FRANCES, P. H. (2002), From first submission to citation: An empirical analysis, Statistica Neerlandica, 56 : 496-509.
6. GARFIELD, E. (1999), Journal impact factor: A brief review, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161 : 979-980.
7. GLÄNZEL, W., MOED, H. F. (2002), Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53 : 171-193.
8. GR ENE, W. H. (2003), Econometric. Analysis (5th ed.), Prentice Hall, New York.
9. GREESON, L. E. (1991), Cultural ethnocentrism and imperialism in citations of American and Scandinavian psychological research, International Journal of Psychology, 26 : 262-268.
10. HARTLEY, J., SOTTO, E., PENNEBAKER, J. (2002), Style and substance in psychology: Are influential articles more readable than less influential ones? Social Studies of Science, 32 : 321-334.
11. INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION (2004), Journal Citation Reports: 2003, Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia, PA.
12. KERR, S., TOLLIVER, J., PETREE, D. (1977), Manuscript characteristics which influence acceptance for management and social science journals, Academy of Management Journal, 20 : 132-141.
13. LEE, S., BOZEMAN, B. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35 : 673-702.
14. LOGAN, J. R. (1988), Producing sociology: Time trends in authorship of journal articles, 1975-1986, American Sociologist, 19 : 167-180.
15. LONG, J. S. (1992), Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity, Social Forces, 71 : 159-178.
16. MOED, H. F., VAN LEEUWEN, T. N. (1995), Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46 : 461-467.
17. MYERS, C. R. (1970), Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology, American Psychologist, 25 : 1041-1048.
18. NEMETH, C. J., GONCALO, J. A. (2005), Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors, Creativity Research Journal, 17 : 1-8.
19. OVER, R. (1980), Citation statistics for psychologists in New Zealand universities: 1975-1977, New Zealand Psychologist, 9 : 73-75.
20. PATSOPOULOS, N. A., ANALATOS, A. A., IOANNIDIS, J. P. A. (2005), Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences, Journal of the American Medical Association, 293 : 2362-2366.
21. RODGERS, R. C., MARANTO, C. L. (1989), Causal models of publishing productivity in psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 : 636-649.
22. ROTHMAN, A. I., PRESHAW, R. (1975), Is scientific achievement a correlate of effective teaching performance? Research in Higher Education, 3 : 29-34.
23. ROUSSEAU, R. (2002), Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues, Library Trends, 50 : 418-439.
24. RUSHTON, J. P. (1984), Evaluating research eminence in psychology: The construct validity of citation counts, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 37 : 33-36.
25. SCHWAB, D. P. (1985), Reviewing empirically based manuscripts: Perspectives on process, In: L. L. CUMMINGS, P. J. FROST (Eds), Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. Irwin, Homewood, IL, pp. 171-181.
26. SEGLEN, P. O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal, 314 : 498-502.
27. STACK, S. (2002), Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice, Journal of Criminal Justice, 30 : 175-182.
28. VUONG, Q. H. (1989), Likelihood Ratio Tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses, Econometrica, 57 : 307-333.
29. WALTERS, G. D. (in press), Measuring the utility of journals in the crime-psychology field: Beyond the impact factor, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.