Monitoring the community impacts of the northwest forest plan: An alternativeto social indicators

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 223-233

  Elizabeth Jackson, J ^a   Lee, Robert G ^b   Sommers, Paul ^b  

^a Department of Sociology ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Community sustainability; Research methods; Small area studies; Social and economic monitoring; Social indicators

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND MANAGEMENT; RURAL PLANNING; RURAL SOCIETY; SOCIAL INDICATOR; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 1642354664     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920490270258     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Branch, K., J. Thompson, J. Creighton, and D. Hooper. 1982. The Bureau of Land Management social effects project: Guide to social assessment. Billings, MT: Mountain West Research
2. Carroll, M. S., and R. G. Lee. 1990. Occupational community and identity among Pacific Northwest loggers: Implications for adapting to economic change. In Community and forestry: Continuities in the sociology of natural resources, eds. R. G. Lee, D. R. Field, and W. R. Burch, Jr. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 141-155
3. Davey, J. A. 1998. From birth to death: A social monitoring framework from New Zealand. Soc. Indicators Res. 49(1):51-67
4. Doak, S. C., and J. Kusel. 1996. Well-being in forest-dependent communities, Part II: A social assessment in focus. In Sierra Nevada ecosystem project: Final report. Davis, California: Center for Water and Wildland Resources. University of California, Davis, 375-401
5. FEMAT (Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team). 1993. Forest Ecosystem Management: An Ecological, Economic, and Social Assessment. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Interior
6. Flora, J. L. 1998. Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociol. 63(4):481-506
7. Force, J. E., and G. E. Machlis. 1997. The human ecosystem, Part II: Social indicators in ecosystem management. Society Nat. Resources 10(4):369-382
8. Force, J. E., G. E. Machlis, and L. Zhang. 2000. The engines of change in resource-dependent communities. For. Sci. 46(3):410-421
9. Force, J. E., G. E. Machlis, L. Zhang, and A. Kearney. 1993. The relationship between timber production, local historical events, and community social change: A quantitative case study. For. Sci. 39(4):722-742
10. Fowler, F. J. 1995. Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
11. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., and D. Nachmias. 2000. Research methods in the social sciences, 6th ed. New York: Worth
12. Gibson, L. J., and E. Glenn. 1999. The Round Valley region economic base study: A generic case study of three hypothetical communities. Econ. Dev. Rev. Fall:53-62
13. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360-1380
14. Harris, C., W. McLaughlin, G. Brown, and D. R. Becker. 2000. Rural communities in the inland Northwest: An assessment of small rural communities in the interior and upper Columbia River basins. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-477
15. Horne, A. L., and R. W. Haynes. 1999. Developing measures of socioeconomic resiliency in the interior Columbia basin. USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-453
16. Isard, W., I. J. Azis, M. P. Drennan, R. E. Miller, S. Saltzman, and E. Thorbecke. 1998. Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate
17. Jacob, S. G., and F. K. Willits. 1994. Objective and subjective indicators of community evaluation: A Pennsylvania assessment. Soc. Indicators Res. 32:161-177
18. Kaufman, H. F. 1959. Toward an interactional conception of community. Social Forces 38(1):8-17
19. Lösch, A. 1954. The economics of location. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
20. Maki, W. R., and R. W. Lichty. 2000. Urban regional economics: Concepts, tools, applications. Ames: Iowa State University Press
21. Morse, J. M. 1994. Designing funded qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research, eds. N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 220-235
22. Parkins, J. 1999. Enhancing social indicators research in a forest-dependent community. For. Chron. 75(5):771-780
23. Parkins, J., R. C. Stedman, and J. Varghese. 2001. Moving towards local-level indicators of sustainability in forest-based communities: A mixed-method approach. Soc. Indicators Res. 56(1):43-72
24. Prescott-Allen, R. 2001. The wellbeing of nations: A country-by-country index of quality of life and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press
25. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster
26. Robison, M. H. 1996. Community input-output models for rural area analysis: With an example from Central Idaho. Moscow, ID: Economic Modeling Specialists
27. Society of American Foresters. 1989. Report of the Society of American Foresters National Task Force on Community Stability. Bethesda, MD: SAF Resource Policy Series
28. Stedman, R. C. 1999. Sense of place as an indicator of community sustainability. For. Chron. 75(5):765-770
29. US Forest Service. 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl. Washington, D.C.: USDA Forest Service; USDI, Bureau of Land Management. This publication can be found online at http://www.or.blm.gov/forestplan/newroda.pdf
30. Wilkinson, K. P. 1991. The community in rural america. New York: Greenwood Press
31. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage