Integrating geographical information systems into travel cost analysis and benefit transfer

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 227-246

  Brainard, Julii ^a   Lovett, Andrew ^b   Bateman, Ian ^b  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GIS;

EID: 0033011652     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/136588199241337     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. HELLERSTEI, D., 1992. The treatment of nonparticipants in travel cost analysis and other demand models. Water Resources Research, 28:1999–2004.
2. LOOMI, J. B., ROAC, B., WAR, F., and READ, R., 1995. Testing transferability of recreation demand models across regions:A study of corps of engineer reservoirs. Water Resources Research, 31:721–730.
3. PARSON, G. R., and KEAL, M. J., 1994. Benefits transfer in a random utility model of recreation. Water Resources Research, 30:2477–2484.
4. ADAMOWIC, W., SWAI, J., BOXAL, P., LOUVIER, J., and WILLIAM, M. 1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuatioa. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32:65–84.
5. BANFIEL, J. D., and RAFTER, A. E., 1993. Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics, 49:803–821.
6. BATEMA, I. J., GARRO, G. D., BRAINAR, J., and LOVET, A. A., 1996. Measurement, valuation and estimation issues in the travel cost method. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47:191–205.
7. BENSO, J. F., and WILLI, K., 1993. Implications of recreation demand for forest expansion in Great Britain. Regional Studies, 27:29–39.
8. BERGIN, J., and PRICE, C., 1994. The travel cost method and landscape quality. Landscape Research, 19:21–22.
9. BHAT, G., and BERGSTROM, J. C., 1997. Integration of geographical information systems based spatial analysis in recreation demand analysis, Faculty Series 96-26 Athens, GA:Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia.
10. BOCKSTAE, N. E., 1995. “ Travel cost models ”. In The Handbook of Environmental Economic, Edited by:Bromle, D. W., 655–671. Cambridge, MA:Basil Blackwell Ltd. Oxford
11. BOXALL, P. C., MCFARLANE, B. L., and GARTRELL, M., 1996. An aggregate travel cost approach to valuing forest recreation at managed sites. The Forestry Chronicle, 72:615–621.
12. BRAINAR, J. S., 1998. Using GIS to develop a travel cost basis for implementing benefit transfers, Norwich:University of East Anglia. PhD thesis
13. BRAINAR, J. S., LOVET, A. A., and BATEMA, I. J., 1997. Using isochrone surfaces in travel cost models. Journal of Transport Geography, 5:117–126.
14. CHO, K., WHITTINGTO, D., and LAURI, D. T., 1996. The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries:A case study of Davao, Philippines. Land Economics, 72:519–537.
15. CLAWSO, M., and KNETSC, J. L., 1966. Economics of Outdoor Recreatio, Washington, DC:Resources for the Future.
16. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. 1992. London traffic monitoring report 1991 Transport Statistics Repor, London:Department of Transport.
17. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. 1993. Vehicle speeds in Great Britai, 1991 Statistics Bulletin 93 London:Department of Transport.
18. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT. 1996. Highways Economics Note No. 2, London:Department of Transport.
19. ENGLIS, D. B. K., and AND BOWKE, J. M., 1996. Sensitivity of whitewater railing consumers surplus to pecuniary travel cost specifications. Journal of Environmental Management, 47:79–91.
20. FORESTRY COMMISSION/COUNTRY SIDE COMMISSION. 1997. 'Woodland creation:Needs and opportunities in the English countryside' Responses to a Discussion Paper CCP 522
21. FULLE, R. M., GROO, G. B., and JONE, A. R., 1994. The land cover map of Great Britain:An automated classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60:553–562.
22. GRAYSO, A. J., SIDAWA, R. M., and THOMPSO, F. P., 1975. “ Some aspects of recreation planning in the Forestry Commission ”. In Recreational Economics and Analysi, Edited by:Seal, G. A. C., 89–107. Harlow Longman Group Ltd.
23. GREE, C. H., TUNSTAL, S. M., N'JA, A., and ROGER, A., 1990. Economic evaluation of environmental goods. Project Appraisal, 5:70–82.
24. GUES, R., and SIMPSO, F., 1994. Woodland visits:Monitoring vehicle use. Countryside Recreation Network News, 2:13–19.
25. PUTMA, S. H., and CHUN, SH., 1989. Effects of spatial system design on spatial interaction models. 1:The spatial system definition problem. Environment and Planning A, 21:21–46.
26. ROSENTHA, D., DONNELL, D., SCHIFFHAUE, M., and BRIN, G., 1986. User's guide to RMTCM:software for travel cost analysi Boulder, CO USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report RM-132
27. RUNCIMA, W. G., 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28. SMIT, V. K., and KAOR, Y., 1990. Signals or noise--Explaining the variations in recreation benefit estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72:419–433.
29. SUTHERLAN, R. J., 1982. The sensitivity of travel cost estimates of recreation demand to the functional form and definition of origin zones. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 7:87–98.
30. US BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 1995. U.S. Census Bureau Home Pag http://www.census.gov/ftp/pub/datamap/fips.list.
31. WHITEMA, A., 1995. The supply and demand for timber, recreation and community forest outputs from forests in Great Britain, University of Edinburgh. PhD thesis
32. WILLI, K. G., and BENSO, J. F., 1989. Recreational values of forests. Forestry, 62:93–110.
33. WILLI, K., and GARRO, G., 1992. Amenity value of forests in Great Britain and its impact on the internal rate of return from forestry. Forestry, 65:331–346.
34. HELLERSTEI, D., 1993. Intertemporal data and travel cost analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3:193–207.
35. HO, J. G., and ROSENTHA, D. H., 1987. Valuing the opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand models:An application to aggregate data. Journal of Leisure Research, 19:174–188.
36. HANLE, N., and RUFFEL, R., 1993. “ The valuation of forest characteristics ”. In Forestry and the Environment:Economic Perspectives, Edited by:Adamowic, W. L., Whit, W., and Phillip, W. E., 171–197. Wallingford:CAB International.
37. KLIN, C. L., 1989. A note on the welfare effects of omitting substitute prices and qualities from travel cost models. Land Economics, 65:290–296.
38. LOOMI, J. B., 1991. The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer Benefit function transfer. Water Resources Research, 28:701–705.
39. LOOMI, J. B., 1995. Four models for determining environmental quality effects on recreational demand and regional economics. Ecological Economics, 12:55–65.
40. LOVET, A. A., BRAINAR, J. S., and BATEMA, I. J., 1997. Developing models to predict demand for recreation in natural areas:A benefit transfers/GIS approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51:373–389.
41. LUZA, E. J., HOTVED, J. E., and GA, C., 1992. Economic valuation of deer hunting on Louisiana public land A travel cost aalysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 24:99–113.
42. MARTI, D., 1990. “ A suite of programs for socioeconomic surface modelling ”. In Technical Reports in Géo-Information Systems, Computing and Cartography, 28Cardiff:Wales and South West Regional Research Laboratory.
43. MCADAM, R. H., 1991. Relative preferences. The Yale Law Journal, 102:1–104.
44. MERCE, E., KRAME, R., and SHARM, N., 1995. Rain forest tourism-Estimating the benefits of tourism development in a new national park in Madagascar. Journal of Forest Economics, 1:239–269.
45. OPENSHA, S., 1977. Optimal zoning systems for spatial interaction models. Environment and Planning A, 9:169–184.
46. OPENSHA, S., and RA, L., 1995. Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography. Environment and Planning A, 27:425–446.
47. ORDNANCE SURVEY. 1987. Gazetteer of Great Brit, London:Macmillan.
48. OZUN, T., JONE, L. L., and CAPP, O., 1993. Functional form and welfare measures in truncated recreation models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75:1030–1035.
49. PRIC, C., CHRISTENSE, J. B., and HUMPHREY, S. K., 1986. Elasticities of demand for recreation site and recreation experience. Environment and Planning A, 18:1259–1263.