Clinical values in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1115-1120

  Matsumoto, Tomoyuki ^a   Tsumura, Nobuhiro ^a   Kurosaka, Masahiro ^a   Muratsu, Hirotsugu ^a   Yoshiya, Shinichi ^a   Kuroda, Ryosuke ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROTOMY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATELLA DISLOCATION; PATELLA FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 33846461174     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20061201-04     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392:315-318.
2. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73:709-714.
3. Ecker ML, Lotke PA, Windsor RE, Cella JP. Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 216:151-158.
4. Feng, EL, Stulberg SD, Wixson RL. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 229:60-71.
5. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E, Hoogewoud H. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8:419-426.
6. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 299:153-156.
7. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76:60-65.
8. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Stenstorm A, Selvik G. Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components. The relationship between prosthetic position and micromotion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; 251:189-197.
9. Stern SH, Insall JN. Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nin to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74:980-986.
10. Wasielewski RC, Galante JO, Leighty R, Natarajan RN, Rosenberg AG. Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical consideration during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 299:31-43.
11. Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M, et al. Prosthetic Alignment and Sizing in Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004; 28:282-235.
12. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rational of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 247:13-14.
13. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 354:49-56.
14. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003; 27:366-369.
15. Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002; 68:215-230.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87:645-652.
17. Mielke RK, Clemens U, Jens JH, Kershally S. Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation-preliminary clinical experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001; 139:109-116.
18. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87:18-28.
19. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: Results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(Suppl):90-98.
20. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85:830-835.
21. Stulberg SD. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416:177-184.