Paradise lost and paradise regained?

D-Lib Magazine

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages

  Markey, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846380933     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10829873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1045/january2007-markey     Document Type: Note

References (59)

1. Anderson, James D. and Melissa A. Hofmann. 2006. A Fully Faceted Syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 43, 1: 7-38.
2. Antelman, Kristin, Emily Andrew K. Lynema, and Pace. 2006. Toward a Twenty-first Century Library Catalog. Information Technology & Libraries 25, 3 (September): 128-139.
3. Atherton, Pauline. 1978. Books Are for Use: Final Report of the Subject Access Project to the Council on Library Resources. Syracuse, NY: School of Information Studies.
4. Awre, Chris et al. 2005. The CREE Project: Investigating User Requirements for Searching within Institutional Environments. D-Lib Magazine 11, 10 (October). 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/october2005- awre〉.
5. Bar-Ilan, Judith, and Noa Fink. 2005. Preference for Electronic Format of Scientific Journals: A Case Study of the Science Library Users at the Hebrew University. Library and Information Science Research 27, 3: 363-376.
6. Bates, Marcia J. 2003. Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Research and Design Review: Improving User Access to Library Catalog and Portal Information; Final Report (Version 3). June 1. 〈http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/2. 3BatesReport6-03.doc.pdf〉.
7. Belkin, Nicholas J. 1980. Anomalous States of Knowledge as a Basis for Information Retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science 5: 133-143.
8. Besant, Larry. Early Survey Findings: Users of Public Access Catalogs want Sophisticated Subject Access. American Libraries 13, 3 (1982): 160.
9. Borgman, Christine L. 2006. Disciplines, Documents, and Data: Convergence and Divergence in the Scholarly Information Infrastructure. ISI Samuel Lazerow Memorial Lecture, University of Tennessee, October 18. 〈http://www.sis. utk.edu/newsArchive/lazerow2006〉.
10. Borgman, Christine L. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Calhoun, Karen. 2006. The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools; Final Report, Prepared for the Library of Congress. March 17. 〈http:// www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final. pdf〉.
12. Cataloging Policy and Support Office. 2006. Series at the Library of Congress. 〈http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/series.html〉.
13. Cooper, Michael D. 2001. Usage Patterns of a Web-based Library Catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 52, 2: 137-148.
14. De Rosa, Cathy et al. 2005. Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC. 〈http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm〉.
15. Debowski, Shelda. 2001. Wrong Way, Go Back! An Exploration of Novice Search Behaviours while Conducting an Information Search. The Electronic Library 19, 6: 371-382.
16. Dolby, J. L., and Howard L. Resnikoff. 1971. On the Multiplicative Structure of Information Storage and Access Systems. Interfaces, The Bulletin of the Institute of Management Sciences 1: 23-30.
17. Drabenstott, Karen M. 1991. Online Catalog User Needs and Behaviors. In Think Tank on the Present and Future of the Online Catalog: Proceedings, edited by Noelle Van Pulis, 59-84. Chicago: Reference and Adult Services Division, American Library Association.
18. Drabenstott, Karen M. 2003. Do Non-domain Experts Enlist the Strategies of Domain Experts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54, 9: 836-854.
19. Ellis, David. 1989. A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design. Journal of Documentation 45: 171-212.
20. Farber, Evan. 1984. Catalog Dependency. Library Journal 109, 3 (February 15): 325-328.
21. Fast, Karl V., and D. Grant Campbell. 2004. "I Still Like Google:" University Student Perceptions of Searching OPACs and the Web. In Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting 2004), 41: 138-146. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
22. Feldman, Susan. 1998. Where Do We Put the Web Search Engines? Searcher 6,10: 40-57.
23. Google. 2004. Google Checks Out Library Books, 〈http://www. google.com/press/pressrel/print_library.html〉.
24. Google. 2005. Corporate Information: Company Overview, 〈http://www.google.com/corporate/index.html〉.
25. Griffiths, Jillian, and Peter Brophy. 2005. Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google. Library Trends 53, 4 (Spring): 539-554.
26. Haas, Warren J. 1979. Managing the Information Revolution: CLR's Bibliographic Service Development Program. Library Journal 104, 16 (September 15): 1867-1870.
27. Hildreth, Charles R. 1989. Intelligent Interfaces and Retrieval Methods for Subject Searching in Bibliographic Systems; Prepared for the Library of Congress. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service.
28. Hildreth, Charles R. 1995. Online Catalog Design Models: Are We Moving in the Right Direction? Report Prepared for the Council on Library Resources, 〈http://www.ou.edu/faculty/H/Charles.R.Hildreth/clr-five.html〉.
29. Kracker, Jacqueline. 2002. Research Anxiety and Students' Perceptions of Research: An Experiment; Part I: Effect of Teaching Kuhlthau's ISP Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 53, 4: 282-294.
30. Kracker, Jacqueline, and Peiling Wang. 2002. Research Anxiety and Students' Perceptions of Research: An Experiment; Part II: Content Analysis of their Writings on Two Experiences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 53, 4: 295-307.
31. Kuhlthau, Carol C. 1993. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Land, Susan M., and Barbara A. Greene. 2000. Project-based Learning with the World Wide Web: A Qualitative Study of Resource Integration. ETR&D 48, 1: 45-67.
33. Larson, Ray R. 1991. Classification Clustering, Probabilistic Information Retrieval, and the Online Catalog. Library Quarterly 61, 2 (April): 133-173.
34. Mann, Thomas. 2006a. The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools. Final Report. Prepared for the Library of Congress. Critical Review. April 3. 〈http://www.guild2910.org/ AFSCMECalhounReviewREV.pdf〉.
35. Mann, Thomas. 2006b. What is Going on at the Library of Congress? June 19. 〈http://www. guild2910.org/AFSCMEWhatIsGoingOn.pdf〉.
36. Mann, Thomas. 2005. Will Google's Keyword Searching Eliminate the Need for LC Cataloging and Classification? 〈http://www.guild2910.org/ searching.htm〉.
37. Marcum, Deanna B. 2006. The Future of Cataloging. Library Resources & Technical Services 50, 1 (January): 5-9.
38. Marcum, Deanna B., and Gerald George. 2003. Who Uses What? Report on a National Survey of Information Users in Colleges and Universities. D-Lib Magazine 9, 10 (October). 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/october2003- george〉.
39. Markey, Karen. 1984. Subject Searching in Library Catalogs. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC.
40. Markey, Karen, and Anh N. Demeyer. 1986. Dewey Decimal Online Classification Project. Dublin, OH: OCLC.
41. Markey, Karen. In press. 25 Years of Research on End-user Searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology.
42. Markey, Karen, and Karen Calhoun. Unique Words Contributed by MARC Records with Summary and/or Contents Notes. In ASIS '87, Proceedings of the 50th ASIS Annual Meeting, edited by Ching-chih Chen, 153-162. Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
43. Matthews, Joseph R., Gary S. Lawrence, and Douglas K. Ferguson. 1983. Using Online Catalogs: A Nationwide Survey. New York: Neal-Schuman.
44. OCLC. 2002. How Academic Librarians can Influence Students' Web-Based Information Choices. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC. 〈http://www.mnstate.edu/ schwartz/informationhabits.pdf〉.
45. Outsell Inc. 2000. Today's Students, Tomorrow's FGUs. Information About Information Briefing 3, 24 (October 16): 1-25.
46. Pew Research Center. 2003. America's Online Pursuits: The Changing Picture of Who's Online and What They Do. 〈http://www.pewinternet.org/ reports/toc.asp?Report=106〉.
47. Rosenberg, Victor. 1966. The Application of Psychometric Techniques to Determine the Attitudes of Individuals toward Information Seeking. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University. AD 637 713.
48. Schniderman, Saul. 2006. Statement of Saul Schniderman representing The Library of Congress Professional Guild, AFSCME Local 2910, before the Committee on House Administration concerning the World Digital Library. July 27. 〈http://www.guild2910.org/〉.
49. Sherman, Chris. 2003. ComScore Launches Search Engines Tracking System. 〈http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/2197801〉.
50. Swain, Deborah E. 1996. Information Search Process Model: How Freshmen Begin Research. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 95-99. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
51. Tennant, Roy. 2005. Google, the Naked Emperor. Library Journal 130, 13 (August): 29.
52. Tiefel, Virginia. 1991. The Gateway to Information: A System Redefines How Libraries are Used. American Libraries 22, 9 (October): 858-860.
53. University of California Libraries. 2005. Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California: Final Report, December 2005, Bibliographic Services Task Force. 〈http://libraries. universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf〉.
54. Valentine, Barbara. 2001. The Legitimate Effort in Research Papers: Student Commitment versus Faculty Expectations. Journal of Academic Librarianship 27, 2 (November): 107-115.
55. Walker, Stephen. 1989. The OKAPI Online Catalogue Research Projects. In The Online Catalogue: Developments and Directions, edited by Charles R. Hildreth, 84-106. London: The Library Association.
56. Wash, Rick, and Emilee Rader. 2006. Incentives for Contribution in del.icio.us: The Role of Tagging in Information Discovery. Manuscript submitted to CHI'07 Conference.
57. Wormell, Irene. 1981. Subject Access Project: The Use of Book Indexes for Subject retrieval system in libraries. International Forum on Information and Documentation 6, 4 (1981): 24-28.
58. Xu, Zhichen et al. 2006. Toward the Semantic Web: Collaborative Tag Suggestions. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop, 〈http://www.rawsugar. com/www2006/13.pdf〉.
59. Yu, Holly, and Margaret Young. 2004. The Impact of Web Search Engines on Subject Searching in OPAC. Information Technology & Libraries 23, 4 (December): 168-180.