Wrong way: Go back! An exploration of novice search behaviours while conducting an information search

The Electronic Library

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 371-382

  Debowski, Shelda ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Databases; End user computing; Information retrieval; Information services; Training

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

END-USER COMPUTING;

ONLINE SEARCHING;

EID: 0035665224     PISSN: 02640473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02640470110411991     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ackerson, L.G. and Young, V.E. (1994), “Evaluating the impact of library instruction methods on the quality of student research”, Research Strategies, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 132-44.
2. Bailey, E.C. (1997), “Help-seeking behavior in the research process of college students”, available http://www.ala.org/acrl/paperhtm/d35.html
3. Bandura, A. (1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.
4. Basch, R. (1995), “Super searchers of the millennium”, Managing for Effective Delivery of Information Services in the 1990’s: The Integration of Computing, Educational and Library Services, Information Science Section, Australian Library and Information Association, Sydney, pp. 271-84.
5. Berger, K.W., Sherrer, J. and Hines, R. (1993), “Rethinking information access”, in Lipow, A.G. (Ed.), Rethinking Reference in Academic Libraries: The Proceedings and Process of Library Solutions Institute No. 2, Library Solutions Press, Berkeley, CA, pp. 127-33.
6. Borgman, C.L., Hirsch, S.G. and Hiller, J. (1996), “Rethinking online monitoring methods for information retrieval systems: from search product to search process”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 568-83.
7. Bowden, E.M. (1985), “Accessing relevant information during problem solving: time constraints on search in the problem space”, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 280-6.
8. Brown, M.E. (1995), “By any other name: accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories”, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 17, pp. 347-85.
9. Carroll, J.M. and Olson, J.R. (1988), “Mental models in human-computer interaction”, in Helander, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, pp. 45-65.
10. Collantes, L.Y. (1995), “Degree of agreement in naming objects and concepts for information retrieval”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 116-32.
11. Debowski, S. (2000), “The hidden user: providing an effective service to users of electronic information sources”, OCLC Systems and Services, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 175-80.
12. Debowski, S., Wood, R.E. and Bandura, A. (2000), “Impact of guided exploration and enactive exploration on self-regulatory mechanisms and information acquisition through electronic inquiry”, Journal of Applied Psychology.
13. Dimitroff, A. (1992), “Mental models theory and search outcome in a bibliographic retrieval system”, Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 141-56.
14. Drabenstott, K.M. and Weller, M.S. (1996), “Failure analysis of subject searches in a test of a new design for subject access to online catalogs”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 7, pp. 519-37.
15. Earley, P.C., Connolly, T. and Lee, C. (1989), “Task strategy interventions in goal setting: the importance of search in strategy development’’, Journal of Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 589-602.
16. Fister, B. (1992), “The research processes of undergraduate students”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp.163-7.
17. Fourie, I. (1999), “Should we take disintermediation seriously?”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 9-15.
18. Frese, M. (1995), “Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results”, in Zucchermaglio, C., Bagnara, S. and Stucky, S.U. (Eds), Organisational Learning and Technological Change, Springer, New York, NY.
19. Harter, S.P. and Cheng, Y.-R. (1996), “Colinked descriptors: Improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 311-25.
20. He, P.W. and Jacobson, T.E. (1996), “What are they doing with the Internet? a study of information seeking behaviours”, Internet Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 31-51.
21. Hogarth, R.M. (1987), Judgement and Choice: The Psychology of Decision, 2nd ed., Wiley, Chichester.
22. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991), “Inside the search process: information seeking from the user's perspective”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 361-71.
23. Lancaster, F.W., Elzy, C., Zeter, M.J., Metzler, L. and Low, Y.M. (1994), “Comparison of the results of end-user searching with results from two modes of searching by skilled intermediaries”, RQ, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 377-83.
24. McCarthy, C.A., Krausse, S. and Little, A.A. (1997), “Expectations and effectiveness using CD-ROMs: what do patrons want and how satisfied are they?”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 128-42.
25. Marchionini, G. (1995), Information Seeking in Electronic Environments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Marshall, J.G. and Allan, S. (1990), “Training and assistance techniques for database users”, The Canadian Journal of Information Science, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 38-49.
27. Michel, D.A. (1994), “What is used during cognitive processing in information retrieval and library searching? Eleven sources of search information”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 45 No. 7, pp. 498-514.
28. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. (1976), “The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 246-75.
29. Neumann, D. (1995), “High school students’ use of databases: results of a national Delphi study”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 284-98.
30. Neumann, L.J. and Ignacio, E.N. (1998), “Trial and error as a learning strategy in system use”, Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, 25-29 October, Vol. 35, pp. 243-52.
31. Olshavsky, R.W. (1979), “Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: a replication and extension”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 24, pp. 300-16.
32. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J.R. and Johnson, E.J. (1993), The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Quint, B. (1991), “Inside a searcher's mind: the seven stages of an online search – part 2”, Online, July, pp. 28-34.
34. Seiden, P., Szymborski, K. and Norelli, B. (1997), “Undergraduate students in the digital library: information seeking behavior in an heterogeneous environment”, available from the American Library Association: http://www.ala.org/acrl/paperhtm/c26.html
35. Shaw, D. (1986), “Nine sources of problems for novice online searchers”, Online Review, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 295-303.
36. Weaver, M. (1993), “The best possible online search”, Information Online and Ondisc, Australian Library and Information Association, Sydney, pp. 301-23.
37. Wildemuth, B.M., de Bliek, R., Friedman, C.P. and File, D.D. (1995), “Medical students’ personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 46 No. 8, pp. 590-607.
38. Wood, R.E. (1986), “Task complexity: definition of the construct’’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 37, pp. 60-82.
39. Wood, R.E. and Locke, E.A. (1990), “Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, pp. 73-109.
40. Wood, R.E., Debowski, S. and Goodman, J. (2001), “Feedback interventions for electronic search”, manuscript submitted for publication.
41. Yee, I.H. (1993, “Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 161-74.
42. Yuan, W. (1997), “End-user searching behavior in information retrieval: a longitudinal study”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 218-34.