An in-depth empirical analysis of patent citation counts using zero-inflated count data model: The case of KIST

Scientometrics

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 27-39

  Lee, Yong Gil ^a   Lee, Jeong Dong ^b   Song, Yong Il ^a   Lee, Se Jun ^c  

^a Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Ministry of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846348576     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0102-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ADAMSA, J. D., G. C. BLACKB, J. R. CLEMMONSE, P. E. STEPHAND (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999, Research Policy, 34 (3) : 259-285.
2. BARNEY, J. (2001), Comparative quality analysis -A statistical approach for rating and valuing patent assets. Mimeo, NACVA Valuation Examiner.
3. CARPENTER, M. P., F. NARIN, P. WOOLF (1981), Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3 (4) : 160-163.
4. CHEN, C., D. HICKS (2004), Tracing knowledge diffusion, Scientometrics, 59 : 199-211.
5. GAY, C., C. LE BAS, P. PATEL, K. TOUACH (2005), The determinants of patent citations: An empirical analysis of French and British patents in the US, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14 (5) : 339-350.
6. GREENE, W. H. (1997), Econometric Analysis the 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
7. HARHOFF, D., F. NARIN, F. M. SCHERER, K. VOPEL (1997), Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation, Social Science Research Center, Berlin, Discussion Paper no 97-26.
8. HAUSMAN, J. A., B. H. HALL, Z. GRILICHES (1984), Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship, Econometrica, 52 : 909-938.
9. HEILBRON, D. (1994), Zero-altered and other regression models for count data with added zeros, Biometrical Journal, 36 : 531-547.
10. HENDERSON, R., I. COCKBURN (1996), Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery, RAND Journal of Economics, 27 : 32-59.
11. Hu, A. G. Z., A. JAFFE (2003), Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (6) : 849-880.
12. JAFFE, A. B., M. TRAJTENBERG, R. HENDERSON (1993), Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 : 577-598.
13. JAFFE, A. B., M. S. FOGARTY, B. A. BANKS (1998), Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46 : 183-204.
14. JAFFE, A. B., M. TRAJTENBERG (1999), International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8 : 105-136.
15. JAFFE, A. B., M. TRAJTENBERG (Eds) (2002), Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. LAMBERT, D. (1992), Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing, Technometrics, 34: 1-14.
17. MEYER, M. (2000a), What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations, Scientometrics, 49 (1) : 93-123.
18. MEYER, M. (2000b), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29 : 409-434.
19. MEYER, M. (2002), Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems, Scientometrics, 54 : 193-212.
20. MEYER, M., T. GOLOUBEVA, J. T. UTECHT (2003), A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors, Scientometrics, 58 : 321-350.
21. MICHEL, J., B. BETTELS (2001), Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports, Scientometrics, 51 (1) : 185-201.
22. NARIN, F., K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26 : 317-330.
23. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (2001), Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Research Policy, 30 : 35-54.
24. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (2002), Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their innovations, Research Policy, 31 : 509-526.
25. VUONG, Q. (1989), Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypothesis, Econometrica, 57 : 307-334.