Parametric stiffness analysis of the Orthoglide

Mechanism and Machine Theory

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 296-311

  Majou, F ^a,b   Gosselin, C ^b   Wenger, P ^a   Chablat, D ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE EN COMMUNICATIONS ET CYBERNÉTIQUE DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Orthoglide; Parametric analysis; PKM design; Stiffness

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MACHINING; MANIPULATORS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; STIFFNESS;

ORTHOGLIDE; PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS; PKM DESIGN;

MACHINE TOOLS;

EID: 33846347228     PISSN: 0094114X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Tlusty J., Ziegert J., and Ridgeway S. Fundamental comparison of the use of serial and parallel kinematics for machine tools. Annals of the CIRP 48 1 (1999)
2. P. Wenger, C.M. Gosselin, B. Maillé, A comparative study of serial and parallel mechanism topologies for machine tools, PKM'99, Milano, 1999, pp. 23-32.
3. F. Majou, P. Wenger, D. Chablat, The design of parallel kinematic machine tools using kinetostatic performance criteria, in: 3rd International Conference on Metal Cutting and High Speed Machining, Metz, France, June 2001.
4. Pritschow G., and Wurst K.-H. Systematic design of hexapods and other parallel link systems. Annals of the CIRP 46 1 (1997) 291-295
5. Company O., and Pierrot F. Modelling and design issues of a 3-axis parallel machine-tool. Mechanism and Machine Theory 37 (2002) 1325-1345
6. T. Brogardh, PKM Research-Important Issues, as seen from a Product Development Perspective at ABB Robotics, Workshop on Fundamental Issues and Future Research Directions for Parallel Mechanisms and Manipulators, Quebec, Canada, October 2002.
7. P. Wenger, D. Chablat, Kinematic Analysis of a new parallel machine tool, in: 7th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Piran-Portoroz, Slovenia, June 2000, pp. 305-314.
8. B.C. Bouzgarrou, J.C. Fauroux, G. Gogu, Y. Heerah, Rigidity analysis of T3R1 parallel robot uncoupled kinematics, in: Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Robotics, Paris, March 2004.
9. Gosselin C.M. Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 6 (1990) 377-382
10. R. Di Gregorio, V. Parenti-Castelli, Influence of leg flexibility on the kinetostatic behavior of a 3-DOF fully parallel manipulator, in: 10th World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Oulu, Finland, June 1999.
11. Tsai L.-W., and Joshi S. Kinematics and optimization of a spatial 3-UPU parallel manipulator. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 122 (2000) 439-446
12. Kong X., and Gosselin C.M. Kinematics and singularity analysis of a novel type of 3-CRR 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator. The International Journal of Robotics Research 21 9 (2002) 791-798
13. Huang T., Zhao X., and Whitehouse D.J. Stiffness estimation of a tripod-based parallel kinematic machine. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18 1 (2002) 50-58
14. Gosselin C.M., and Zhang D. Stiffness analysis of parallel mechanisms using a lumped model. International Journal of Robotics and Automation 17 1 (2002) 17-27
15. Chablat D., and Wenger P. Architecture optimization of the Orthoglide, a 3-DOF parallel mechanism for machining applications. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 19 3 (2003) 403-410
16. www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/~wenger/Orthoglide, Orthoglide Web site, June 2002.
17. F. Majou, Kinetostatic analysis of translational parallel kinematic machines, Ph.D. thesis, Université Laval, Québec, Canada and École Centrale Nantes, France, September 2004.
18. A. Dugas, J.J. Lee, M. Terrier, J.Y. Hascoët, Virtual manufacturing for high speed milling, in: 35th CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, Seoul, Korea, May 13-15, 2002, pp. 199-205.
19. R. Abiven, Étude des rigidités statique et dynamique du robot Orthoglide, Master thesis, Université Blaise Pascal, IFMA, 2002.