Robotic ocular surgery

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-21

  Tsirbas, A ^a   Mango, C ^a   Dutson, E ^b  

^a JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CORNEA; CORNEAL LACERATION; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EYE SURGERY; LACERATION; MICROSURGERY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD;

ANIMALS; CORNEA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAPAROSCOPY; MANIKINS; MICROSURGERY; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846225955     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.096040     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cleary K, Nguyen C. State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comp Aid Surg 2001;6:312-28.
2. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389-402.
3. Okada S, Tanaba Y, Yamauchi H, et al. Single-surgeon thoracoscopic surgery with a voice-controlled robot. Lancet 1998;351:1249.
4. Broeders IAMJ, Ruurda JP. Robotics in laparoscopic surgery: current status and future perspectives. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;236(Suppl):76-80.
5. Merola S, Weber P, Wasielewski A, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder. Surg Laporosc Endosc Percut Tech 2002;12:46-51.
6. Hockstein NG, Nolan P, O'Malley BW Jr, et al. Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: a technical feasibility study using the daVinci® surgical robot and an airway mannequin. Laryngoscope 2005;115:780- 5.
7. Morit A, Sora S, Mitsuishi M, et al. Microsurgical robotic system for the deep surgical field: development of a prototype and feasibility studies in animal and cadaveric models. J Neurosurg 2005;103:320- 7.
8. Arezzo A, Ulmer F, Weiss P, et al. Experimental trial on solo surgery for minimally invasive therapy. Surg Endosc 2000;14:955-9.
9. Hashizume M, Konishi K, Tsutsumi N, et al. A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surgery 2002;131:S330-3.
10. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 2002;235:487-92.
11. Talamini MA. Robotic surgery: is it for you? Adv Surg 2002;36:1-13.
12. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2004;18:372-8.
13. Eubanks TA, Pellegrini CA. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. In: Cameron JL, eds. Current surgical therapy. 7th edn. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2001:1411-16.
14. Susilo AW, Schulz AP. Totally robotic technique in multivessel coronary disease-is it possible? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Arm 2002;10:92-4.
15. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1271-3.
16. Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ, Simmermacher RPM, et al. Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:41-5.
17. Kim VB, Chapman WHH III, Albrecht RJ, et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Perc Tech 2002;12:33-40.