Genetic affinities among subspecies of a widespread Australian lycaenid butterfly, Ogyris amaryllis (Hewitson)

Australian Journal of Zoology

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 429-446

  Schmidt, D J ^a   Hughes, J M ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; ALLOZYME; BUTTERFLY; CLADISTICS; DIVERGENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; HOST PLANT; HOST SPECIFICITY; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; SPECIALIZATION; SUBSPECIES;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

LYCAENIDAE; OGYRIS AMARYLLIS;

EID: 33846196284     PISSN: 0004959X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/ZO06058     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aagaard, K., Hindar, K., Pullin, A. S., James, C. H., Hammarstedt, O., Balstad, T., and Hanssen, O. (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in brown argus butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Aricia) from north-western Europe. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75, 27-37. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00004.x
2. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory as an extension of maximum likelihood principle. In 'Second International Symposium on Information Theory'. (Eds B. N. Petrov and F. Csake.) pp. 267-281. (Akademiai Kaido: Budapest.)
3. Aston, C. E., and Dunn, K. L. (1985). Ants attendant on Ogyris amaryllis amata Waterhouse (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Australian Entomological Magazine 12, 36.
4. Atsatt, P. R. (1981). Ant-dependent food plant selection by the mistletoe butterfly Ogyris amaryllis (Lycaenidae). Oecologia 48, 60-63. doi:10.1007/BF00346988
5. Avise, J. C. (2000). 'Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species.' (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.)
6. Ayala, F., Tracey, M. L., Hedgecock, D., and Richmond, R. C. (1974). Genetic differentiation during the speciation process in Drosophila. Evolution 28, 576-592. doi:10.2307/2407283
7. Barlow, B. A. (1984). Loranthaceae. In 'Flora of Australia: Rhizophorales to Celastrales. Vol. 22'. (Ed. A. S. George.) pp. 68-131. (Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra.)
8. Barraclough, T. G., and Vogler, A. P. (2000). Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. American Naturalist 155, 419-434. doi:10.1086/303332
9. Barton, N. H., and Hewitt, G. M. (1985). Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 113-148. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.000553
10. Braby, M. F. (2000). 'Butterflies of Australia: Their Identification, Biology and Distribution.' (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.) Buckley, T. R. (2002). Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical datasets. Evolution 51, 509-523.
11. Burbrink, F. T., Lawson, R., and Slowinski, J. B. (2000). Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the polytypic north American rat snake (Elaphe obsolete): a critique of the subspecies concept. Evolution 54, 2107-2118. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[2107: MDPOTP]2.0.CO;2
12. Carson, H. L., and Templeton, A. R. (1984). Genetic revolutions in relation to speciation phenomena: the founding of new populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15, 97-131. doi:10.1146/annurev.es. 15.110184.000525
13. Clary, D. O., and Wolstenholme, D. R. (1985). The mitochondrial genome of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organisation, and genetics. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22, 252-271. doi:10.1007/ BF02099755
14. Common, I. F. B., and Waterhouse, D. F. (1981). 'Butterflies of Australia.' Revised edn. (Angus and Robertson: Sydney.)
15. Corander, J., Waldmann, P., and Sillanpaa, M. J. (2003). Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163, 367-374.
16. Coyne, J. A., and Orr, H. A. (2004). 'Speciation.' (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)
17. Crisp, M., Cooke, L., and Steane, D. (2004). Radiation of the Australian flora: what can comparisons of molecular phylogenies across multiple taxa tell us about the evolution of diversity in present day communities? Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London B 359, 1551-1571. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1528
18. Demboski, J. R., and Sullivan, J. (2003). Extensive mtDNA variation within the yellow-pine chipmunk, Tamias amoenus (Rodentia: Sciuridae), and phylogeographic inferences for northwest North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 389-408. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(02) 00363-9
19. Dobzhansky, T. (1940). 'Genetics and the Origin of Species.' (Columbia University Press: New York.)
20. Doyle, J. J., and Doyle, J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bulletin 19, 11-15.
21. Eastwood, R. G. (2006). Ant association and speciation in Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): consequences of novel adaptations and Pleistocene climate changes. Ph.D. Thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane.
22. Eastwood, R., and Fraser, A. M. (1999). Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology 24, 503-537. doi:10.1046/j.1440-169x.1999.01000.x
23. Eastwood, R., Pierce, N. E., Kitching, R. L., and Hughes, J. M. (2006). Do ants enhance diversification in lycaenid butterflies? Phylogeographic evidence from a model myrmecophile Jalmenus evagoras. Evolution 60, 315-327. doi:10.1554/05-422.1
24. Emelianov, I., Mallet, J., and Baltensweiler, W. (1995). Genetic differentiation in Zeiraphera diniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae, the larch budmoth): polymorphism, host races or sibling species? Heredity 75, 416-424.
25. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., and Quattro, J. M. (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479-491.
26. Excoffier, L., Laval, G., and Schneider, S. (2005). Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1, 47-50.
27. Farris, J. S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A. G., and Bult, C. (1994). Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319. doi:10.1111/ j.1096-0031.1994.tb00181.x
28. Felsenstein, J. (2002). 'PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Version 3.6a3.' (Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington: Seattle.)
29. Ferguson, D. J. (1983). Ogyris amaryllis amata Waterhouse (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) tended by Camponotus ants. Australian Entomological Magazine 10, 58.
30. Fiedler, K. (1997). Life history patterns of myrmecophilous butterflies and other insects: their implications on tropical species diversity. In 'Tropical Biodiversity and Systematics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems'. (Ed. H. Ulrich.) pp. 71-92. (Museum Alexander Koenig: Bonn.)
31. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, R., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for the amplification of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294-299.
32. Fraser, A. M., Tregenza, T., Wedell, N., Elgar, M. A., and Pierce, N. E. (2002). Oviposition tests of ant preference in a myrmecophilous butterfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, 861-870. doi:10.1046/j.1420- 9101.2002.00434.x
33. Funk, D. J., and Omland, K. E. (2003). Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34, 397-423. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34. 011802.132421
34. Funk, D. J., Filchak, K. E., and Feder, J. L. (2002). Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116, 251-267. doi:10.1023/A:1021236510453
35. Gompert, Z., Nice, C. C., Fordyce, J. A., Forister, M. L., and Shapiro, A. M. (2006). Identifying units for conservation using molecular systematics: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Molecular Ecology 15, 1759-1768. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2006.02905.x
36. Grund, R. (1996). Range extensions, new foodplant recordings and biology for some South Australian butterflies. Victorian Entomologist 26, 93-100.
37. Grund, R. (1998). New foodplant recordings and biological observations for some Western Australian butterflies. Victorian Entomologist 28, 65-68.
38. Guo, S. W., and Thompson, E. A. (1992). Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48, 361-372. doi:10.2307/2532296
39. Hendry, P., and Moss, J. (2006). New host plant and attendant ants for the Satin Azure butterfly Ogyris amaryllis hewitsoni (Waterhouse, 1902). Butterfly and Other Invertebrates Club Newsletter 41, 12-13.
40. Hughes, J. M., Baker, A. M., de Zylva, G., and Mather, P. B. (2001). A phylogeographic analysis of the Australian magpie: evidence for selection in maintenance of the distribution of two plumage morphs. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74, 25-34. doi:10.1006/ bijl.2001.0564
41. Jiggins, C. D., and Mallet, J. (2000). Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15, 250-255. doi:10.1016/ S0169-5347(00)01873-5
42. Kelley, S. T., Farrell, B. D., and Mitton, J. B. (2000). Effects of specialisation on genetic differentiation in sister species of bark beetles. Heredity 84, 218-227. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00662.x
43. Kishino, H., and Hasegawa, M. (1989). Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29, 170-179. doi:10.1007/BF02100115
44. Mayr, E. (1942). 'Systematics and the Origin of Species.' (Columbia University Press: New York.)
45. Mayr, E. (1963). 'Animal Species and Evolution.' (Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA.)
46. Miller, M. P. (1997). Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA) 1.3: A Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. (Computer software distributed by the author.)
47. Monteiro, A., and Pierce, N. E. (2001). Phylogeny of Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from COI, COII, and EF-1 alpha gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18, 264-281. doi:10.1006/mpev.2000.0872
48. Moss, J. (2006). Note on Ogyris butterfly hostplants and amendments to the 'Hostplant book' information. Butterfly and other Invertebrates Club Newsletter 41, 14-15.
49. Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106, 283-292. doi:10.1086/282771
50. Nei, M. (1978). Esimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89, 583-590.
51. New, T. (1999). The evolution and characteristics of the Australian butterfly fauna. In 'Biology of Australian Butterflies. Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera. Vol. 6'. (Eds R. L. Kitching, E. Scheermeyer, R. E. Jones and N. E. Pierce.) pp. 33-52. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
52. Nice, C. C., and Shapiro, A. M. (1999). Molecular and morphological divergence in the butterfly genus Lycaeides (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in north America: evidence of recent speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, 936-950. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00111.x
53. Nice, C. C., and Shapiro, A. M. (2001). Population genetic evidence of restricted gene flow between host races in the butterfly genus Mitoura (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94, 257-267. doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0257:PGEORG]2.0.CO;2
54. Nice, C. C., Fordyce, J. A., Shapiro, A. M., and Ffrench-Constant, R. (2002). Lack of evidence for reproductive isolation among ecologically specialised lycaenid butterflies. Ecological Entomology 27, 702-712. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00458.x
55. O'Brien, S. J., and Mayr, E. (1991). Bureaucratic mischief: recognizing endangered species and subspecies. Science 251, 1187-1188. doi:10.1126/science.251.4998.1187
56. Orr, M., and Smith, T. B. (1998). Ecology and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13, 502-505. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(98) 01511-0
57. Pierce, N. E. (1984). Amplified species diversity: a case study of an Australian lycaenid butterfly and its attendant ants. In 'The Biology of Butterflies'. (Eds R. I. Vane-Wright and P. R. Ackery.) pp. 197-200. (Academic Press: London.)
58. Pierce, N. E., Braby, M. F., Heath, A., Lohman, D. J., Mathew, J., Rand, D. B., and Travassos, M. A. (2002). The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annual Review of Entomology 47, 733-771. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201. 145257
59. Posada, D., and Crandall, K. A. (1998). MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-881. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/14.9.817
60. Pritchard, J. K., and Wen, W. (2002). 'Documentation for Structure Software, Version 2.0.' (University of Chicago: Chicago.)
61. Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., and Donnelly, P. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945-959.
62. Ramey, R. R., Liu, H., Epps, C. W., Carpenter, L. M., and Wehausen, J. D. (2005). Genetic relatedness of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) to nearby subspecies of Z. hudsonius as inferred from variation in cranial morphology, mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite DNA: implications for taxonomy and conservation. Animal Conservation 8, 329-346. doi:10.1017/ S1367943005002313
63. Raymond, M., and Rousset, F. (1995). GENEPOP, version 1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. The Journal of Heredity 86, 248-249.
64. Richardson, B. J., Baverstock, P. R., and Adams, M. (1986). 'Allozyme Electrophoresis. A Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies.' (Academic Press: Sydney.)
65. Ronquist, F., and Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572-1574. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
66. Rubinoff, D., and Sperling, F. A. H. (2004). Mitochondrial DNA sequence, morphology and ecology yield contrasting conservation implications for two threatened buckmoths (Hemileuca: Saturniidae). Biological Conservation 118, 341-351. doi:10.1016/ j.biocon.2003.09.013
67. Schmidt, D. J., and Rice, S. J. (2002). Association of ants with juvenile Ogyris amaryllis amaryllis Hewitson (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in south-eastern Queensland. Australian Journal of Entomology 41, 164-169. doi:10.1046/j.1440-6055.2002.00278.x
68. Shattuck, S. O. (1999). 'Australian Ants: Their Biology and Identification.' (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
69. Shimodaira, H., and Hasegawa, M. (1999). Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 1114-1116.
70. Simmons, R. B., and Weller, S. J. (2001). Utility and evolution of cytochrome b in insects. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20, 196-210. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.0958
71. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., and Flook, P. (1994). Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651-701.
72. Swofford, D. L. (2002). 'PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony (*and Other Methods).' (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)
73. Wahlberg, N., Oliveira, R., and Scott, J. A. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships of Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA variation and species delimitations. Systematic Entomology 28, 257-273. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3113.2003.00212.x
74. Whinnett, A., Zimmermann, M., Willmott, K. R., Herrera, N., Mallarino, R., Simpson, F., Joron, M., Lamas, G., and Mallet, J. (2005). Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly 'suture zone'. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Series B. Biological Sciences 272, 2525-2533. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3247
75. Wilson, E. O., and Brown, W. L. (1953). The subspecies concept and its taxonomic application. Systematic Zoology 2, 97-111. doi:10.2307/ 2411818
76. Zakharov, E. V., Caterino, M. S., and Sperling, F. A. H. (2004). Molecular phylogeny, historical biogeography, and divergence time estimates for swallowtail butterflies of the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Systematic Biology 53, 193-215. doi:10.1080/10635150490423403
77. Zink, R. M. (2004). The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 271, 561-564. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2617