Twelve-month sealant retention in a school-based program using a self-etching primer/adhesive

Journal of Public Health Dentistry

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 191-197

  Venker, Daniel J ^a,b   Kuthy, Raymond A ^b   Qian, Fang ^b   Kanellis, Michael J ^b  

^a College of Dentistry ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Child; Dental bonding; Molar; Pit and fissure sealants; Program development

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; FISSURE SEALANT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SEALANT;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 10044271035     PISSN: 00224006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02752.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent 1992;14:41-6.
2. Choi JW, Drummond JL, Dooley R, Punwani I, Soh JM. The efficacy of primer on sealant shear bond strength. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:286-8.
3. Hebling J, Feigal RJ. Reducing sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel by using one bottle dentin adhesives as an intermediate bonding layer. Am J Dent 2000;13:187-91.
4. Feigal RJ, Hitt JC, Splieth C. Sealant retention on salivary contaminated enamel: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:88-97.
5. Feigal RJ, Musherurue P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agent: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res 2000; 79:1850-6.
6. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first generation to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:20S-25S.
7. Feigal RJ, Quelhas I. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt-L-Pop®. Am J Dent 2003;16:249-51.
8. Horowitz HS, Heifetz SB, Poulson S. Adhesive sealant clinical trial: an overview of results after four years in Kalispell, Montana. J Prev Dent;1976;3:38-9, 44, 46-7.
9. Horowitz HS, Heifetz SB, McCune RJ. The effectiveness of an adhesive sealant in preventing occlusal caries: Findings after two years in Kalispell, Montana. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:885-90.
10. Heller KE, Reed SG, Bruner FW, Eklund SA, Burt BA. Longitudinal evaluation of sealing molars with and without incipient dental caries in a public health program. J Public Health Dent 1995;55:148-53.
11. Kumar JV, Davila ME, Green EL, Lininger LL. Evaluation of a school-based sealant program in New York State. J Public Health Manag Pract 1997;3:43-51.
12. Zabos GP, Glied SA, Tobin JN, Amato E, Turgeon L, Mootabar RN, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a school-based dental sealant program for low-socioeconomic-status children: a practice-based report. J Health Care Poor Underserv 2002;13:38-48.
13. Feigal RJ. Sealant and preventive restorations: review of effectiveness and clinical changes for improvement. Pediatr Dent 1998;20:85-92.
14. Leske GS, Pollard S, Cons N. The effectiveness of dental hygiene teams in applying a pit and fissure sealant. J Prev Dent 19762:33-6.
15. Chosack A, Shapira J, Tzukert A, Eidelman E. The parameters influencing time of application of fissure sealants. etching time, type of polymerization, and experience. Clin Prev Dent 1987;46:156-60.
16. Foreman FJ, Matis BA. Sealant retention rates of dental hygienists and dental technicians using differing training protocols. Pediatr Dent 1992;14:189-90.
17. Poulson S, Thylstrup A, Christensen PF. Evaluation of a pit- and fissure-sealing program in a public health service after 2 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979;7:154-7.