A low numerical dissipation patch-based adaptive mesh refinement method for large-eddy simulation of compressible flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 221, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 63-87

  Pantano, C ^a   Deiterding, R ^a   Hill, D J ^a   Pullin, D I ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compressible flow; LES; Numerical methods; SAMR; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; MESH GENERATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; TURBULENCE;

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT METHODS; CENTERED FINITE DIFFERENCES; CENTERED SCHEMES; ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY SCHEMES; HYBRID NUMERICAL METHOD; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; LES; NUMERICAL DISSIPATION; PATCH BASED; STRUCTURED ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 33846155870     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Berger M.J., and Oliger J. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial-differential equations. J. Comp. Phys. 53 3 (1984) 484-512
2. Berger M.J., and Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comp. Phys. 82 1 (1989) 64-84
3. Warming R.F., and Beam R.M. Upwind 2nd-order difference schemes and applications in aerodynamic flows. AIAA J. 14 9 (1976) 1241-1249
4. Shu C.W., Zang T.A., Erlebacher G., Whitaker D., and Osher S. High-order ENO schemes applied to 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional compressible flow. Appl. Numer. Math. 9 1 (1992) 45-71
5. Liu X.D., Osher S., and Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 115 1 (1994) 200-212
6. Ducros F., Laporte F., Souleres T., Guinot V., Moinat P., and Caruelle B. High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structured meshes: application to compressible flows. J. Comp. Phys. 161 1 (2000) 114-139
7. Hill D.J., and Pullin D.I. Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks. J. Comp. Phys. 194 2 (2004) 435-450
8. Gerritsen M., and Olsson P. Designing and efficient solution strategy for fluid flows. ii. Stable high-order central finite difference schemes on composite adaptive grids with sharp shock resolution. J. Comp. Phys. 147 2 (1998) 293-317
9. Nordström J., and Carpenter M. Boundary and interface conditions for high-order finite-difference methods applied to the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comp. Phys. 148 2 (1999) 621-645
10. Braack M., and Ern A. Coupling multimodelling with local mesh refinement for the numerical computation of laminar flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 8 4 (2004) 771-788
11. Lax P., and Wendroff B. Systems of conservation laws. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13 2 (1960) 217-237
12. Toro E.F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics (1997), Springer, Berlin
13. Berger M. On conservation at grid interfaces. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 24 5 (1987) 967-984
14. Pember R.B., Howell L.H., Bell J.B., Colella P., Crutchfield W.Y., Fiveland W.A., and Jessee J.P. An adaptive projection method for unsteady, low-mach number combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol. 140 1 (1998) 123-168
15. Howell L.H., Pember R.B., Colella P., Jesse J.P., and Fiveland W.A. A conservative adaptive-mesh algorithm for unsteady, combined-mode heat transfer using the discrete ordinates method. Num. Heat Trans. 35 B (1999) 407-430
16. Howell L.H., and Greenough J.A. Radiation diffusion for multi-fluid Eulerian hydrodynamics with adaptive mesh refinement. J. Comp. Phys. 184 1 (2003) 53-78
17. Lele S.K. Compact finite differences schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comp. Phys. 103 (1992) 16-42
18. W.J. Feiereisen, W.C. Reynolds, J.H, Ferziger, Numerical simulation of a compressible, homogeneous, turbulent shear flow. Technical Report TF-13, Dept. Mech. Engineering, Stanford University, 1981.
19. Zang T.A. On the rotation and skew-symmetric forms for incompressible flow simulation. Appl. Numer. Math. 7 1 (1991) 27-40
20. G.A. Blaisdell, Numerical simulation of compressible homogeneous turbulence, PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1991.
21. Honein A.E., and Moin P. Higher entropy conservation and numerical stability of compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comp. Phys. 201 2 (2004) 531-545
22. Samtaney R., Pullin D.I., and Kosovic B. Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics. Phys. Fluids 13 5 (2001) 1415-1430
23. Pope S.B. Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Phys. 6 (2004) 35
24. Trefethen L.N. Stability of finite-difference models containing two boundaries or interfaces. Math. Comput. 45 172 (1985) 279-300
25. Gaitonde D.V., and Visbal M.R. Advances in the application of high-order techniques in simulation of multi-disciplinary phenomena. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 17 2 (2003) 95-106
26. Shu C.W., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 77 2 (1988) 439-471
27. Hessenius K.A., and Rai M.M. Applications of a conservative zonal scheme to transient and geometrically complex problems. Comp. Fluids 14 1 (1986) 43-58
28. Rai M.M. A conservative treatment of zonal boundaries for Euler equation calculations. J. Comp. Phys. 62 (1986) 472-503
29. Gottlieb S., Shu C.-W., and Tadmor E. Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43 1 (2001) 89-112
30. Misra A., and Pullin D.I. A vortex-based subgrid model for large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 9 8 (1997) 2443-2454
31. Pullin D.I. Vortex-based model for subgrid flux of a passive scalar. Phys. Fluids 12 9 (2000) 2311-2319
32. Kosović B., Pullin D.I., and Samtaney R. Subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulations of compressible turbulence. Phys. Fluids 14 4 (2002) 1511-1522
33. Jiang G.-S., and Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 126 1 (1996) 202-228
34. Vichnevetsky R. Wave propagation and reflection in irregular grids for hyperbolic equations. App. Num. Math. 3 (1987) 133-166
35. Ghosal S. An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence. J. Comp. Phys. 125 1 (1996) 187-206
36. Benkenida A., Bohbot J., and Jouhaud J.C. Patched grid and adaptive mesh refinement strategies for the calculation of the transport of vortices. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 40 (2002) 855-873
37. Morinishi Y., Lund T.S., Vasilyev O.V., and Moin P. Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J. Comp. Phys. 143 1 (1998) 90-124
38. Cockburn B., and Shu C.-W. The local discontinuous Galerkin method for time-dependent convection diffusion systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 (1998) 2440
39. Lötstedt P., Söderberg S., Ramage A., and Hemmingsson-Frändén L. Implicit solution of hyperbolic equations with space-time adaptivity. BIT 42 1 (2002) 134-158
40. Ferm L., and Lötstedt P. Accurate and stable grid interfaces for finite volume methods. App. Num. Math 49 (2004) 207-224
41. B. Riemann, 1890.
42. Cook A.W., and Cabot W.H. A high-wavenumber viscosity for high-resolution numerical methods. J. Comp. Phys. 195 2 (2004) 594-601
43. Balsara D.S., and Shu C.W. Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasing high order of accuracy. J. Comp. Phys. 160 (2000) 405-452
44. 6 interface. Shock Waves 4 5 (1995) 247-252
45. Hill D.J., Pantano C., and Pullin D.I. Large-eddy simulation and multiscale modeling of a Richtmyer-Meshkov instability flow with reshock. J. Fluid Mech. 557 (2006) 29-61
46. Gutmark E., and Wygnanski I. The planar turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 73 3 (1976) 465-495
47. Stanley S.A., Sarkar S., and Mellado J.P. A study of the flow-field evolution and mixing in a planar turbulent jet using direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 450 (2002) 377-407
48. Strand B. Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx. J. Comp. Phys. 110 1 (1994) 47-67
49. Carpenter M.H., Gottlieb D., and Abarbanel S. Time-stable boundary conditions for finite difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and application to high-order compact schemes. J. Comp. Phys. 111 (1994) 220
50. Gustafsson B. Convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary-value problems. Math. Comput. 29 130 (1975) 396-406
51. Gustafsson B., Kreiss H.O., and Sundstrom A. Stability theory of difference approximations for mixed initial boundary-value problems ii. Math. Comp. 26 119 (1972) 649-686
52. Strikwerda J.C. Initial boundary value problems for the method of lines. J. Comp. Phys. 34 (1980) 94-107
53. Abarbanel S.S., and Chertock A.E. Strict stability of high-order compact implicit finite-difference schemes: the role of boundary conditions for hyperbolic PDEs, I. J. Comp. Phys. 160 2 (2000) 42-66
54. Thompson K.W. Time dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems. J. Comp. Phys. 68 (1987) 1-24
55. Rudy D.H., and Strikwerda J.C. A non-reflective outflow boundary conditions for subsonic Navier-Stokes calculations. J. Comp. Phys. 36 1 (1980) 55-70
56. Poinsot T.J., and Lele S.K. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comp. Phys. 101 (1992) 104-129
57. Voelkl T., and Pullin D.I. A physical-space version of the stretched-vortex subgrid-stress model for large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids 12 7 (2000) 1810-1825
58. R. Deiterding, Parallel adaptive simulation of multi-dimensional detonation structures. PhD thesis, Brandenburgische Technische Universität Cottbus, 2003.
59. Deiterding R. Construction and application of an AMR algorithm for distributed memory computers. In: Plewa T., Linde T., and Weirs V.G. (Eds). Adaptive Mesh Refinement - Theory and Applications. vol. 41 Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering (2005), Springer 361-372