Boundary and Interface Conditions for High-Order Finite-Difference Methods Applied to the Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 148, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 621-645

  Nordström, Jan ^a,b   Carpenter, Mark H ^c  

^a Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; VISCOUS FLOW;

CONDITION; CONSTANT COEFFICIENTS; FINITE DIFFERENCE OPERATORS; HIGH-ORDER FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; INTERFACE CONDITIONS; MESH SIZE; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; STRICT STABILITIES; STRONG STABILITY;

NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS;

EID: 0000915165     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6133     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tam C., Webb J. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 107:1993.
2. Tam C. Computational aeroacoustics: Issues and methods. AIAA J. 33:1995.
3. Pruett C., Zang T., Chang C., Carpenter M. Spatial direct numerical simulation of high speed boundary-layer flows. Part I. Algorithmic considerations and validation. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 7:1995.
4. H. Jurgens, D. Zing, Implementation of a high-accuracy finite-difference scheme for linear wave phenomena, Proceedings from ICOSAHOM 95, 1995.
5. A. Taflove, Re-inventing electromagnetic supercomputing solution of Maxwell's equations via direct time integration on space grid, 30th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1992.
6. W. Don, C. Quille, Resolution study for the numerical simulation of reactive flows, Proceedings from ICOSAHOM 95, 1995.
7. Kreiss H. O., Oliger J. Comparison of accurate methods for the integration of hyperbolic equations. Tellus. 24:1972.
8. P. Olsson, High-order difference methods and data-parallel implementation, Department of Scientific Computing, Uppsala University, 1992.
9. B. Strand, High-order difference approximations for hyperbolic initial boundary value problems, Department of Scientific Computing, Uppsala University, 1996.
10. G. Scherer, On energy estimates for difference approximations to hyperbolic partial differential equations, Department of Scientific Computing, Uppsala University, 1977.
11. Kreiss H. O., Scherer G. Finite element and finite difference methods for hyperbolic partial differential equations. Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations. 1974.
12. Carpenter M. H., Gottlieb D., Abarbanel S. The stability of numerical boundary treatments for compact high-order finite-difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 108:1994.
13. Gustafsson B., Kreiss H. O., Sunström. Stability theory of difference approximations for mixed initial boundary value problems. Math. Comp. 26:1972.
14. Olsson P. Summation by parts, projections, and stability I. Math. Comp. 64:1995;1035.
15. Olsson P. Summation by parts, projections, and stability II. Math. Comp. 64:1995;1473.
16. Carpenter M. H., Gottlieb D., Abarbanel S. Time-stable boundary conditions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: Methodology and application to high-order compact schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 111:1994.
17. Gustafsson B., Kreiss H. O., Oliger J. Time dependent problems and difference methods. 1996;Wiley, New York.
18. Gustafsson B., Olsson P. Fourth-order difference methods for hyperbolic IBVPs. J. Comput. Phys. 117:1995.
19. Sjögren B. High-order centered difference methods for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 117:1995.
20. J. Hyman, M. Shashkov, J. Castillo, S. Steinberg, High order mimetic finite difference methods on nonuniform grids, Proceedings from ICOSAHOM 95, 1995.
21. Kopriva D. A. Spectral methods for the Euler equations, the blunt body problem revisited. AIAA J. 29:1991;1458.
22. Hesthaven J. S., Gottlieb D. A stable penalty method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. 1. Open boundary conditions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 17:1996;579.
23. Hesthaven J. S. A stable penalty method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. II. One-dimensional domain decomposition schemes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18:1997.
24. Carpenter M. H., Nordström J., Gottlieb D. A Stable and Conservative Interface Treatment of Arbitrary Spatial Accuracy. 1998.
25. Van Loan C. Computational Frameworks for the Fast Fourier Transform. 1992.
26. Kreiss H. O., Lorenz J. Initial Boundary Value Problems and the Navier-Stokes Equations. 1989.
27. Nordström J. The use of characteristic boundary conditions for the Navier-Stokes equations. Comput. & Fluids. 24:1995;609.
28. Nordström J. The influence of open boundary conditions on the convergence to steady state for the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 85:1989;210.
29. Strand B. Summation by parts for finite difference approximations forddx. J. Comput. Phys. 110:1994;47.
30. Carpenter M. H., Otto J. High-order cyclo-difference techniques: An alternative to finite differences. J. Comput. Phys. 118:1995;242.
31. Gustafsson B. The convergence rate for difference approximations to mixed initial boundary value problems. Math. Comp. 29:1975;396.
32. Gustafsson B. The convergence rate for difference approximations to general mixed initial boundary value problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 18:1981.
33. Carpenter M. H., Kennedy C. A. Fourth-Order 2N-Storage Runge-Kutta Schemes. April 1994.
34. White F. M. Viscous Fluid Flow. 1974.