Erratum: The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration (Journal of Management (2007) vol. 33(1) (111-132) 10.1177/0149206306295307);The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration

Journal of Management

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 111-132

  Rico, Ramón ^a   Molleman, Eric ^b   Sánchez Manzanares, Miriam ^c   Van der Vegt, Gerben S ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Decision quality; Social integration; Task autonomy; Team diversity faultlines

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846122584     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206308318003     Document Type: Erratum

References (69)

1. Allison, P. D. 1978. Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43: 865-880.
2. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. 1992. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3: 321-341.
3. Antonioni, D., & Park, H. 2001. The effects of personality similarity on peer ratings of contextual work behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 54: 331-360.
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44: 1-26.
5. Bezrukova, K., Thatcher, S. M. B., & Jehn, K. in press. Group heterogeneity and faultlines: Comparing alignment and dispersion theories of group composition. In L. Thompson & K. Behfar (Eds.), Conflict in Teams. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
6. Blau, P. 1977. Inequality and composition: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.
7. Breaugh, J. A. 1985. The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38: 551-570.
8. Brewer, M. B. 1996. Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace: 47-68. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. 1984. Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation: 281-302. New York: Academic Press.
10. Byrne, D. 1971. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
11. Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49: 429-452.
12. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. 1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suit. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
13. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14. Dudley, N., Orvis, K., Lebiecki, J., & Cortina, J. 2006. A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40-57.
15. Evans, B. K., & Fischer, D. G. 1992. A hierarchical model of participatory decision-making, job autonomy, and perceived control. Human Relations, 45: 1169-1189.
16. Fiedler, K., Schenck, W., Watling, M., & Menges, J. I. 2005. Priming trait inferences through pictures and moving pictures: The impact of open and closed mindsets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 229-244.
17. Gibson, C. B., & Vermeulen, F. 2003. A healthy divide: Subgroups as stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 202-239.
18. Gladstein, D. L. 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
19. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Hollingshead, A. B. 1993. Sociocognition in work groups: The evolution of group integrative complexity and its relation to task performance. Small Group Research, 24(3): 383-405.
20. Halfhill, T., Nielsen, T. M., Sundstrom, E., & Weilbaecher, A. 2005. Group personality composition and performance in military service teams. Military Psychology, 17, 39-53.
21. Harrison, D., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. 2002. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1029-1045.
22. Jackson, S. E. 1996. The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), The psychology of groups at work: 53-76. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
23. Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. 2004. Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multi-level analysis of team diversity and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 675-702.
24. Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. 2003. Recent research on teams and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29: 801-830.
25. Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 256-282.
26. Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. 2004. A field study of group diversity, group context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 1-27.
27. Jehn, K., Neale, M., & Northcraft, G. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763.
28. Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., & Thomas, D. 2003. The effect of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resources Management, 42: 3-21.
29. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., & Smith, E. M. 1999. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of work performance: Implications for staffing, personnel actions, and development: 240-292. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein and S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Langfred, C. W. 2005. Autonomy and performance in teams: The multilevel moderating effect of task interdependence. Journal of Management, 31: 513-529.
32. Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. 2004. Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 934-945.
33. Lau, D., & Murnighan, J. K. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23: 325-340.
34. Lau, D., & Murnighan, J. K. 2005. Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 645-659.
35. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. 1990. Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41: 585-634.
36. Li, J. T., & Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 794-813.
37. Lievens, F., De Fruyt, F., & Van Dam, K. 2001. Assessors' use of personality traits in descriptions of assessment centre candidates: A five-factor model perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74: 623-636.
38. Maass, A., Colombo, A., Colombo, A., & Sherman, S. J. 2001. Inferring traits from behaviors and behaviors from traits: The induction-deduction asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81: 391-404.
39. Marcus-Newhall, A., Miller, N., Holtz, R., & Brewer, M. B. 1993. Cross-cutting category membership with role assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32: 125-146.
40. McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. McGrath, J. E. 1998. A view of group composition through a group-theoretic lens. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: 255-272. Stanford, CT: JAI.
42. Michel, J., & Hambrick, D. 1992. Diversification posture and the characteristics of the top management team. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 9-37
43. Milliken, F., & Martins, L. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21: 402-433.
44. Mohammed, S., & Angell, L. 2003. Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research, 34(6), 651-677.
45. Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M. 1995. Designing team-based organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46. Molleman, E. 2000. The modalities of self-management: The "must," "may," "can" and "will" of local decision making. The International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20: 889-910.
47. Molleman, E. 2005. Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decision and Negotiation, 14: 173-193.
48. Molleman, E., Nauta, A., & Jehn, K. E. 2004. Person-job fit applied to teamwork: A multi-level approach. Small Group Research, 36: 515-539.
49. Montoya-Weiss, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Song, M. 2001. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1251-1262.
50. Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S., & Christiansen, N. 1999. The relationship between workteam personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group and Organizational Management, 24(1), 28-45.
51. O'Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. 1989. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 21-37.
52. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1-28.
53. Simons, T. 1995. Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and debate as contingent predictors of company performance: The complimentarity of group structure and process. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings: 62-66.
54. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662-673.
55. Stokes, J. P. 1983. Components of group cohesion: Intermember attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking. Small Group Behavior, 14: 163-173.
56. Tajfel, H. 1978. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
57. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
58. Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. 2003. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12: 217-241.
59. Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., Ding, D. Z., & Hu, J. 2003. Conflict values and team relationships: Conflict's contribution to team effectiveness and citizenship in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 69-88.
60. Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. 2004. The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87: 482-493.
61. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
62. Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. 2005. Learning and performance in multi-functional teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 532-547.
63. Van der Vegt, G. S., & Van de Vliert, E. 2005. Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. Journal of Management, 31: 73-89.
64. Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Oosterhof, A. 2003. Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 715-727.
65. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 1008-1022.
66. Webber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. 2001. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27(2), 141-162.
67. Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35: 91-121.
68. Williams, K., & O'Reilly, C. A. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: 77-140. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
69. Wong, S. 2003. Collective cognition in teams: The role of interactive learning and effects on team performance. Paper presented at the 63rd Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.