Drop downs and scroll mice: The effect of response option format and input mechanism employed on data quality in Web surveys

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 111-128

  Healey, Benjamin ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Drop down box; Measurement error; Radio button; Scroll mouse; Web survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846105750     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439306293888     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnau, R. C., Thompson, R. L., & Cook, C. (2001). Do different response formats change the latent structure of responses? An empirical investigation using taxometric analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61 (1). 23-44.
2. Birnholtz, J. P., Horn, D. B., Finholt, T. A., & Bae, S. J. (2004). The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a Web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 355-362.
3. Bosnjak, M., & Tuten, T. L. (2003). Prepaid and promised incentives in Web surveys: An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 208-217.
4. Cobanoglu, C., & Cobanoglu, N. (2003). The effect of incentives in Web surveys: Application and ethical considerations. International Journal of Market Research, 45, 475-488.
5. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in Web or Internet-based surveys. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 60 (6). 821-821.
6. Couper, M. P. (2000). Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 384-396.
7. Couper, M. P. (2005). Technology trends in survey data collection. Social Science Computer Review, 23 (4). 486-501.
8. Couper, M. P., Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., & Crawford, S. D. (2004). What they see is what we get - Response options for Web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 22 (1). 111-127.
9. Couper, M. P., Traugott, M. W., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 230-253.
10. Crawford, S. D., Couper, M. P., & Lamias, M. J. (2001). Web surveys - Perceptions of burden. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (2). 146-162.
11. Deutskens, E., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of Internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15 (1). 21-36.
12. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
13. Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R., & Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for constructing Web surveys. Pullman: Washington State University, Social and Economic Sciences Research Center.
14. Goritz, A. S. (2004). The impact of material incentives on response quantity, response quality, sample composition, survey outcome, and cost in online access panels. International Journal of Market Research, 46, 327-345.
15. Heerwegh, D. (2003). Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client-side paradata from a Web survey. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 360-373.
16. Heerwegh, D. (2004, May). Using progress indicators in Web surveys. Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research conference, Phoenix, Arizona.
17. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2002a). An evaluation of the effect of response formats on data quality in Web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 471-484.
18. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2002b). Web surveys: The effect of controlling survey access using PIN numbers. Social Science Computer Review, 20 (1). 10-21.
19. Heerwegh, D., & Loosveldt, G. (2003). An evaluation of the semiautomatic login procedure to control Web survey access. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 223-234.
20. Heerwegh, D., Vanhove, T., Matthijs, K., & Loosveldt, G. (2005). The effect of personalization on response rates and data quality in Web surveys. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (2). 85-99.
21. Horowitz, A. (2004). Zooming in on customers. Sales & Marketing Management, 156 (11). 21-21.
22. Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of Web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (1). 94-101.
23. Manfreda, K. L., Batagelj, Z., & Vehovar, V. (2002). Design of Web survey questionnaires: Three basic experiments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7 ( 3 ).
24. SAS Institute Inc. (1999). Chapter 47: The NPAR1WAY procedure. In SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8 (pp. 2507-2551). Cary, NC: Author.
25. Tourkin, S., Cox, S., Parmer, R., & Zukerberg, A. (2005, May). (Inter) net gain? Experiments to increase Web based response. Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Miami, Florida [Available by request to steven.c.tourkin@census.gov ].
26. Trouteaud, A. R. (2004). How you ask counts: A test of Internet-related components of response rates to a Web-based survey. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 385-392.
27. Tuten, T. L., Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2004). Effects of immediate versus delayed notification of prize draw results on response behavior in Web surveys: An experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 22, 377-384.
28. Venice, D. L. (2006). Shopping portal moves customer surveys online; Metrics soar. Marketing News, 40 (11). 9-9.
29. WebSideStory. (2006). WebSideStory index: Site search conversion data, latest Firefox figures. Retrieved June 15, 2006, from http://www.websidestory. com/news-events/press-releases/view-release.html?id%20=%20309&lid%20= %20Press+Release+-+309&lpos%20=%20News
30. Weiss, T. R. (2004). Apparel maker gets instant feedback with online survey tool. Computerworld, 38 (37). 31-32.
31. W3Schools. (2006). Browser statistics. Retrieved June 15, 2006, from http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp