Genetic diversity among accessions of the endangered box huckleberry (Gaylussacia brachycera) based on AFLP markers

Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 439-448

  Pooler, Margaret R ^a   Dix, Ruth L ^a   Griesbach, Robert J ^a  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

AFLP; Amplified fragment length polymorphism; Conservation genetics; Endangered plant; Gaylussacia brachycera; Genetic variation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONSERVATION STATUS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; SHRUB; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

KENTUCKY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; VIRGINIA;

GAYLUSSACIA BRACHYCERA;

EID: 33846098335     PISSN: 10955674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3159/1095-5674(2006)133[439:GDAAOT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BARRY, T., G. COLLERAN, M. GLENNON, L. K. DUNICAN, AND F. GANNON. 1991. The 16 s/23 s ribosomal spacer region as a target for DNA probes to identify eubacteria. PCR Meth. Appl. 1: 51-56.
2. BEARDSLEY, P. M., A. YEN, AND R. G. OLMSETAD. 2003. AFLP phylogeny of Mimulus section Erythranthe and the evolution of hummingbird pollination. Evolution 57: 1397-1410.
3. CAMP, W. H. 1941. Studies in the Ericales: a review of the North American Gaylussacieae; with remarks on the origin and migration of the group. Bull. Torrey Club 68: 531-551.
4. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION. 2006. CPC National Collection Plant Profile. Retrieved January 5, 2006. 〈http://www.centerforplantcon-servation.org/ASP/CPC_ViewProfile.asp? CPC-Num=1999〉
5. COVILLE, F. V. 1919. The threatened extinction of the box huckleberry. Science L (1280): 30-34.
6. CRABLE, A. 1999. Meet the world's oldest - and hardest working - plant. Lancaster New Era. Aug. 20, 1999.
7. DESPRÉS, L., L. GIELLY, B. REDOUTET, AND P. TABERLET. 2003. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 27: 185-196.
8. th edition. Stipes Publishing LLC, Champaign, IL.
9. DODD, R. S. AND N. KASHANI. 2003. Molecular differentiation and diversity among the California red oaks (Fagaceae; Quercus section Lobatae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 884-892.
10. ESCARAVAGE, N., S. QUESTIAU, A. PORNON, B. DOCHE, AND P. TABERLET. 1998. Clonal diversity in a Rhododendron ferrugineum L. (Ericaceae) population inferred from AFLP markers. Mol. Ecol. 7: 975-982.
11. FANIZZA, G., R. CHAABANE, F. LAMAJ, L. RICCIARDI, AND P. RESTA. 2003. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among aromatic grapevines (Vitis vinifera). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 1043-1047.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
13. FLOYD, J. W. 2002. Phylogenetic and biogeographic patterns in Gaylussacia (Ericaceae) based on morphological, nuclear DNA, and chloroplast DNA variation. Syst. Bot. 27: 99-115.
14. HODKINSON, T. R., S. A. RENVOIZE, G. N. CHONGHAILE, C. M. A. STAPLETON, AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. A comparison of ITS nuclear rDNA sequence data and AFLP markers for phylogenetic studies in Phyllostachys (Bambusoideae, Poaceae). J. Plant Res. 113: 259-269.
15. KARDOLUS, J. P., H. J. VAN ECK, AND R. G. VAN DEN BERG. 1998. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: a first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 210: 87-103.
16. KOOPMAN, W. J. M., M. J. ZEVENBERGEN, AND R. G. VAN DEN BERG. 2001. Species relationships in Lactuca S.L. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1881-1887.
17. KRUSSMANN, G. 1977. Manual of cultivated broadleaved trees and shrubs. Vol II, E-Pro. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
18. LACY, R. C. 1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conserv. Biol. 1: 143-158.
19. LYONS, K. G. AND M. W. SCHWARTZ. 2001. Rare species loss alters ecosystem function - invasion resistance. Ecol. Lett. 4: 358-365.
20. MACE, E. S., R. N. LESTER, AND C. G. GEBHARDT. 1999a. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships among the cultivated eggplant, Solanum melongena L., and wild relatives (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 626-633.
21. MACE, E. S., C. G. GEBHARDT, AND R. N. LESTER. 1999b. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 634-641.
22. MAYNARD SMITH, J. 1971. What use is sex? J. Theor. Biol. 30: 319-335.
23. PALACIOS, C. AND F. GONZALEZ-CANDELAS. 1999. AFLP analysis of the critically endangered Limonium cavanillesii (Plumbaginaceae). J. Hered. 90: 485-489.
24. PEAKALL, R., D. EBERT, L. J. SCOTT, P. F. MEAGHER, AND C. A. OFFORD. 2003. Comparative genetic study confirms exceptionally low genetic variation in the ancient and endangered relictual conifer, Wollemia nobilis (Araucariaceae). Mol. Ecol. 12: 2331-2343.
25. PE APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS. 1996. AFLP Plant Mapping Protocol. Revision B. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Foster City, CA.
26. POOLER, M. R. 2003. Molecular genetic diversity among 12 clones of Lagerstroemia fauriei revealed by AFLP and RAPD markers. HortScience 38: 256-259.
27. POOLER, M. R., L. G. H. RIEDEL, S. E. BENTZ, AND A. M. TOWNSEND. 2002. Molecular markers used to verify interspecific hybridization between hemlock (Tsuga) species. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127: 623-627.
28. ROHLF, F. J. 1992. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 1.70 Exeter Publishing, Ltd, Setauket, NY.
29. ROTTENBERG, A. AND J. S. PARKER. 2003. Conservation of the critically endangered Rumex rothschildianus as implied from AFLP diversity. Biol. Conserv. 114: 299-303.
30. SMITH, H. AND D. SMITH. 1971. The box huckleberry, Gaylussacia brachycera. Castanea 36: 81-89.
31. STEPHENS, P. A. AND W. J. SUTHERLAND. 1999. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology, and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 401-405.
32. USDA, NRCS. 2006, The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda. gov). Data compiled from various sources by Mark W. Skinner. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490, USA.
33. VOS, P., R. HOGERS, M. BLEEKER, M. REIJANS, T. VAN DE LEE, M. HORNES, A. FRIJTERS, J. POT, J. PELEMAN, M. KUIPER, AND M. ZABEAU. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 4407-4414.
34. WHERRY, E. T. 1922. The box huckleberry as an illustration of the need for field work. Torreya 22: 81-84.
35. WILBER, R. L. AND S. BLOODWORTH. 2004. Notes on the box huckleberry, Gaylussacia brachycera (Ericaceae) and its unexpected presence in North Carolina. Rhodora 106: 371-377.
36. WILLAMAN, J. J. 1965. The oldest living plants. Morris Arboretum Bulletin 16: 65-66.
37. WILSON, H. D., J. DOEBLEY, AND M. DUVALL. 1992. Chloroplast DNA diversity among wild and cultivated members of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 859-865.
38. YAP, I. V. AND R. J. NELSON. 1996. WinBoot: A program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines.