Selective adhesion and mineral deposition by osteoblasts on carbon nanofiber patterns

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 65-72

  Khang, Dongwoo ^a   Sato, Michiko ^d   Price, Rachel L ^b   Ribbe, Alexander E ^c   Webster, Thomas J ^b,d  

^a Department of Physics ^*  (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Purdue Laboratory of Chemical Nanotechnology and Departments of Chemistry   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Biomaterials; Carbon nanofibers; Carbon nanotubes; Orthopedic; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

CARBON NANOTUBE;

ARTICLE; BONE MINERALIZATION; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CALCIFICATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; NANOTUBES, CARBON; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33846100819     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/nano.2006.1.1.65     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. [AAOS] American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [online]. Accessed April 26, 2005. URL: http://www.aaos.org.
2. Elias KL, Price RL, Webster TJ. 2002. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials, 23:3279-87.
3. Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI. 2001. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science, 294: 1684-8.
4. Healy KE, Thomas CH, Rezania A, et al. 1996. Kinetics of bone cell organization and mineralization on materials with patterned surface chemistry. Biomaterials, 17:195-208.
5. Kaplan FS, Hayes WC, Keaveny TM, et al. 1994. Bone biology. In Kaplan FS et al (eds). Orthopedic basic science. Columbus, OH: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. p 127.
6. Martin CR, Kohli P. 2002. The emerging field of nanotube biotechnology. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2:29-37.
7. McFarland CD, Thomas CH, DeFilippis C, et al. 2000. Protein adsorption and cell attachment to patterned surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res, 49: 200-10.
8. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. 2003. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. Biomaterials, 24:1877-87.
9. Price RL, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. 2004. Increased osteoblast viability in the presence of smaller nano-dimensioned carbon fibers. Nanotechnology, 15:892-900.
10. Price RL, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. 2005. Select protein interactions increase osteoblast functions on carbon nanofiber based materials. J Biomed Mater Res. In press.
11. Reif M, Oesterhelt F, Heymann B, et al. 1997. Single molecule force spectroscopy on polysaccharides by atomic force microscopy. Science, 275:1295-7.
12. Supronowicz PR, Ajayan PM, Ullmann KR, et al. 2002. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating current stimuli. J Biomed Mater Res, 59:499-506.
13. Webster TJ. 2001. Nanophase ceramics: the future orthopedic and dental implant material. In Ying JY (ed). Advances in chemical engineering, 27. Academic Pr. p 125-66.
14. Webster TJ, Waid MC, McKenzie JL, et al. 2003. Nano-biotechnology: carbon nanofibers as improved neural and orthopedic implants. Nanotechnology, 15:48-54.