Effect of peptide ligand dipole moments on the redox potentials of Au 38 and Au140 nanoparticles

Langmuir

Volumn 22, Issue 25, 2006, Pages 10584-10589

  Holm, Allan H ^a,c   Ceccato, Marcel ^a   Donkers, Robert L ^a   Fabris, Laura ^a   Pace, Giuseppe ^b   Maran, Flavio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL PULSE VOLTAMMETRY; DIPOLE MOMENTS; LIGAND PLACE EXCHANGE; PEPTIDE CONCENTRATION;

AMINO ACIDS; GOLD; OLIGOMERS; PROTEINS; REDOX REACTIONS;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

2 AMINO 2 METHYLPROPIONIC ACID; 2-AMINOISOBUTYRIC ACID; GOLD; LIGAND; NANOPARTICLE; PEPTIDE; THIOL DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; SURFACE PROPERTY;

AMINOISOBUTYRIC ACIDS; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; GOLD; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOPARTICLES; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PEPTIDES; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33846030163     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la061553b     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. (a) Schmid, G. Nanoparticles; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
2. (b) Daniel, M.-C.; Astruc, D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 293-346.
3. (a) Hicks, J. F.; Templeton, A. C.; Chen, S.; Sheran, K. M.; Jasti, R.; Murray, R. W.; Debord, J.; Schaaff, T. G.; Whetten, R. L. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 3703-3711.
4. (b) Templeton, A. C.; Wuelfing, W. P.; Murray, R. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 27-36.
5. Zhang, J. Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, G. Self-Assembled Nanostructures; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher: New York, 2003, pp 271-307.
6. Guo, R.; Georganopoulou, D.; Feldberg, S. W.; Donkers, R. L.; Murray, R. W. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 2662-2669.
7. (a) Lee, D.; Donkers, R. L.; DeSimone, J. M.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 123, 1182-1183.
8. (b) Lee, D.; Donkers, R. L.; Wang, G.; Harper, A. S.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6193-6199.
9. (a) Guo, R.; Song, Y.; Wang, G.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2752-2757.
10. (b) Guo, R.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12140-12143.
11. 5e-g (a) Woehrle, G. H.; Warner, M. G.; Hutchison, J. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 9979-9981.
12. (b) Yang, Y.; Chen, S. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 75-79.
13. Woehrle, G. H.; Brown, L. O.; Hutchison, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2172-2183.
14. Donkers, R. L.; Song, Y.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 2004, 20, 4703-4707.
15. (e) Brown, L. O.; Hutchison, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12384-12385.
16. (f) Wang, W.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 2005, 21, 7015-7022.
17. (g) Balasubramanian, R.; Guo, R.; Mills, A. J.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8126-8132.
18. (h) Shichibu, Y.; Negishi, Y.; Tsukuda, T.; Teranishi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13464-13465.
19. (a) Chen, S.; Murray, R. W.; Feldberg, S. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 9898-9907.
20. (b) Chen, S.; Ingram, R. S.; Hostetler, M. J.; Pietron, J. J.; Murray, R. W.; Schaaff, T. G.; Khoury, J. T.; Alvarez, M. M.; Whetten, R. L. Science 1998, 280, 2098-2101.
21. Jimenez, V. L.; Georganopoulou, D. G.; White, R. J.; Harper, A. S.; Mills, A. J.; Lee, D.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6864-6870.
22. (a) Chen, S.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 1999, 15, 682-689.
23. (b) Hicks, J. F.; Zamborini, F. P.; Osisek, A. J.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7048-7053.
24. Hicks, J. F.; Miles, D. T.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13322-13328.
25. Miles, D. T.; Murray, R. W. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1251-1257.
26. (e) Quinn, B. M.; Liljeroth, P.; Ruiz, V.; Laaksonen, T.; Kontturi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6644-6645.
27. Shin, Y.-G.; Newton, M. D.; Isied, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3722-3732.
28. Toniolo, C.; Crisma, M.; Formaggio, F.; Peggion, C. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2001, 60, 396-419.
29. Karle, I.; Balaram, P. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 6747-6756.
30. (a) Toniolo, C.; Bonora, G. M.; Barone, V.; Bavoso, A.; Benedetti, E.; Di Blasio, B.; Grimaldi, P.; Lelj, F.; Pavone, V.; Pedone, C. Macromolecules 1985, 18, 895-902.
31. (b) Toniolo, C.; Benedetti, E. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1991, 16, 350-353.
32. 9
33. Toniolo, C.; Crisma, M.; Formaggio, F.; Peggion, C.; Broxterman, Q. B.; Kaptein, B. Biopolymers (Pept. Sci.) 2004, 76, 162-176.
34. (a) Antonello, S.; Formaggio, F.; Moretto, A.; Toniolo, C.; Maran, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2874-2875.
35. (b) Improta, R.; Antonello, S.; Formaggio, F.; Maran, F.; Rega, N.; Barone, V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 1023-1033.
36. Polo, F.; Antonello, S.; Formaggio, F.; Toniolo, C.; Maran, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 492-493.
37. Fabris, L.; Antonello, S.; Armelao, L.; Donkers, R. L.; Polo, F.; Toniolo, C.; Maran, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 126, 326-336.
38. Donkers, R. L.; Lee, D.; Murray, R. W. Langmuir 2004, 20, 1945-1952.
39. Antonello, S.; Musumeci, M.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Maran, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9541-9549.
40. When the exchange was carried out in the presence of a 5 molar equiv of peptide, the reaction required a similar amount of time to reach equilibrium, but the final absorption intensity was lower, which indicated that the final MPC had a higher loading of peptide.
41. 15 are suspected to play an additional effect on the observed difference.
42. Under identical experimental TGA conditions, while desorption of phenylethanethiol typically occurs at 210-220°C, that of peptides 1-3 is observed at temperatures higher by 60-100°C.
43. 7e
44. 38 clusters can be prepared by using thiolated Aib peptides. Further results on this matter, which confirmed this synthetic outcome, will be reported elsewhere.
45. Typical values are on the order of 170-190: Riddick, J. A.; Bunger, W. B.; Sakano, T. K. Organic Solvents, Physical properties and methods of purification, 4th ed.; Techniques of chemistry, Vol. II, Weissberger, A., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1986.
46. For more heavily exchanged clusters, the optical-absorption data would point to an increase of the energy gap, but this is an aspect, which might be associated with the presence of oriented dipole moments in the monolayer, that would require specific studies.
47. Preliminary results obtained on the experimental determination of the dipole moments of series of Aib homooligomers (Ceccato, M.; Di Noto, V.; Zangoni, E.; Maran, F. Work in progress) indicated that the peptide dipole moment linearly increases with the number of Aib units. This outcome also implies that these peptides are indeed stiff even when short. For peptides with one, two, and three intramolecular hydrogen bonds. 8.22, 10.79, and 12.34 D were determined, respectively.
48. See, for example, the following articles and pertinent references therein: (a) Alloway, D. M.; Hofmann, M.; Smith, D. L.; Gruhn, N. E.; Graham, A. L.; Colorado, R., Jr.; Wysocki, V. H.; Lee, T. R.; Lee, P. A.; Armstrong, N. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11690-11699.
49. (b) de Boer, B.; Hadipour, A.; Mandoc, M. M.; van Woudenbergh, T.; Blom, P. W. M. Adv. Mater. 2005, 5, 621-625.
50. Yasutomi, S.; Morita, T.; Imanishi, Y.; Kimura, S. Science 2004, 304, 1944-1947.