Information use and secondary school students: A model for understanding plagiarism

Information Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Williamson, Kirsty ^a,b   McGregor, Joy ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846005879     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ashworth, P., Bannister, P. & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic. Studies in Higher Education, 22 (2), 187-204.
2. Bates, M. (2002). Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 1-15.
3. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: Anchor Press.
4. Bow, A. (2002). Ethnographic techniques. In K. Williamson, Research methods for students and professionals: information management and systems, (2nd ed.) (pp. 265-280). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.
5. Bowman, V. (2004). Teaching intellectual honesty in a tragically hip world: a pop-culture perspective. In V. Bowman (Ed.), The plagiarism plague: a resource guide and CD-Rom tutorial for educators and librarians (pp. 3-10). New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Towards an experimental ecology of human development. London: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the information given: studies in the psychology of knowing. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
8. Bull, J., Collins, C., Coughlin, E. & Sharpe D. (2001) Technical review of plagiarism detection software report. Luton, UK: University of Luton. Retrieved 30 August 2006 from http:/www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ luton.pdf
9. Carroll, J. (2002). Handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
10. Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.) (pp. 249-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Chester, G. (2001). Plagiarism detection and prevention: final report of the JISC electronic plagiarism detection project. Cited in Carroll, J. (2002). Handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, 19.
12. Cox, A., Currall, J & Connolly, S (2001). The human and organisational issues associated with network security. Bristol, UK: JISC Committee for Awareness, Liaison and Training. Retrieved 30 August, 2006 from www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/ACF28B.rtf
13. Culwin, F., MacLeod, A, & Lancaster, T. (2001). Source code plagiarism in UK HE Computing Schools. Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee. (Technical Report SBU-CISM-01-01). Retrieved 30 August, 2006 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/southbank.pdf
14. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
16. Dervin, B., Zweizig, D., Banister, M., Gabriel, M., Hall, E. P., Kwan, C., et al. (1976). The development of strategies for dealing with the information needs of residents, Phase 1 Citizen study, Final report on project L0035JA, Grant No. OEG 0 74 7308 to the Office of Education. Seattle, WA: School of Communication, University of Washington. (ERIC Document ED125640).
17. Fisher, K.E., Erdelez, S. & McKechnie, E.F. (Eds.) (2005). Theories of information behavior: a researcher's guide. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
18. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
19. Hammersley, M. (1995). The politics of social research. London: Sage.
20. Hummert, M. L., Nussbaum, J. F. & Wiemann, J. M. (1992). Communication and the elderly: cognition, language and relationships. Communication Research, 19 (4), 413 422.
21. Jonassen, D.H. (1999) Learning with technology: a constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
22. Kelly, G. (1963). The psychology of personal constructs. Vols. 1 & 2. New York, NY: Norton.
23. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1993). Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. Norwood, N. J. : Ablex Publishing Corporation.
24. Lackie, R.J. & D'Angelo-Long, M. (2005). It's a small world?: cross-cultural perspectives and ESL considerations. In V. Bowman (Ed.), The plagiarism plague: a resource guide and CD-Rom tutorial for educators and librarians (pp. 35-48). New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
25. Limberg, L. (1999). Experiencing information seeking and learning: a study of the interactions between two phenomena. Information Research, 5(1), paper 68. Retrieved 3 January, 2006 from http://informationr.net/ir/5-1/paper68.html
26. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Marsden, H., Hicks, M. & Bundy, A. (2004). Educational integrity: plagiarism and other perplexities. Proceedings of the first Australasian Educational Integrity Conference. Adelaide, S.A.: University of Adelaide.
28. McCabe, D. (2004). Promoting academic integrity: a US/Canadian perspective. In Marsden, H., Hicks, M. & Bundy, A. (Eds.), Educational integrity: plagiarism and other perplexities. Proceedings of the first Australasian Educational Integrity Conference (pp. 3-11). Adelaide, S. A.: University of Adelaide.
29. McGregor, J. H. (1993). Cognitive processes and the use of information: a qualitative study of higher order thinking skills used in the research process by students in a gifted program. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 2367.
30. McGregor, J. H. (1995). Process or product: constructing or reproducing knowledge. School Libraries Worldwide, 1(1), 28-40.
31. McGregor, J. H. & Streitenberger, D. (1998). Do scribes learn? Copying and information use. School Library Media Quarterly Online 1(1). Retrieved 3 January, 2006 from http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/ aaslpubsandjournals/slmrb/ slmrcontents/volume11998slmqo/mcgregor.htm
32. McGregor, J. & Williamson, K. (2005). Appropriate use of information at the secondary school level: understanding and avoiding plagiarism. Library and Information Science Research, 27(4), 496-512.
33. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timwell, E. & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing: researching people. Melbourne, VIC: Longman Cheshire.
34. Nardi, B.A. & O'Day, V.L. (1999). Information ecologies: using technology with heart. Chapter four: information ecologies. First Monday, 4(5). Retrieved 22 January, 2006 from http://www.firstmonday. org/issues/issue4_5/nardi_chapter4. html
35. Newstead, S.E., Franklyn-Stokes, A. & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating, Journal of Educational Psychology 88(2), 229-241.
36. Saule, S. (2002). Ethnography. In K. Williamson, Research methods for students, academics and professionals: information management and systems (2nd ed.) (pp. 177-193). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies.
37. Schwandt, T.A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretivism, hermaneutics, and the social constructionism. In N.K. Denzin, & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. (2nd ed.) (pp. 189-213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Stark, L-J, Perfect, T.J. & Newstead, S.E. (2005). When elaboration leads to appropriation: unconscious plagiarism in a creative task. Memory, 13(6), 561-573.
39. Todd, R. (1998). WWW, critical literacies and learning outcomes. Teacher Librarian, 26(2), 16-21.
40. Williamson, K. (1995). Older adults: information, communication and telecommunications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Monash, Australia.
41. Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: the role of incidental learning acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library & Information Science Research, 20(1), 23-40.
42. Williamson, K. (2005). Ecological theory for the study of human information behaviour. In Fisher, K E., Erdelez, S. & McKechnie, E. F. (Eds.) Theories of information behavior: a researcher's guide. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
43. Williamson, K. & Manaszewicz, R. (2002). Breast cancer information needs and seeking: Towards an intelligent, user sensitive portal to breast cancer knowledge online. New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 203-219.
44. Wilson, T.D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
45. Wilson, T.D. (2000). Recent trends in user studies: research and qualitative methods. Information Research, 5(3), paper 164. Retrieved 24 January, 2006 from http://informationr.net/ir/5-3/paper76.html