Breast MR Imaging in the Diagnostic Setting

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 329-337

  Schnall, Mitchell ^a   Orel, Susan ^a  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SCREENING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SCINTIMAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 33845984545     PISSN: 10649689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2006.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Humphrey L.L., Helfand M., Chan B.K., et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 137 (2002) 347-360
2. Institute of Medicine. Saving womens' lives: integration and innovation: a framework for progress in early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer (2005), National Academies Press, Washington (DC)
3. Fletcher S.W., and Elmore J.G. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 348 (2003) 1672-1680
4. Hall F.M., Storella J.M., Silverstone D.Z., et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 167 (1988) 353-358
5. Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 38 4 (2000) 791-807
6. Stravos D., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., et al. Solid breast nodules. Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 96 (1995) 123-134
7. Rosen E.L., Turkington T.G., Soo M.S., et al. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology 234 2 (2005) 527-534
8. Mathieu I., Mazy S., Willemart B., et al. Inconclusive triple diagnosis in breast cancer imaging: is there a place for scintimammography?. J Nucl Med 46 10 (2005) 1574-1581
9. Kaiser W.A., and Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 170 (1989) 681-686
10. Heywang S.H., Wolf A., Pruss E., et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171 (1989) 95-103
11. Harms S.E., Flamig D.P., Hesley K.L., et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187 (1993) 493-501
12. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G., et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202 (1997) 833-841
13. Boetes C., Barentsz J.O., Mus R.D., et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193 (1994) 777-781
14. Hulka C.A., Smith B.L., Sgroi D.C., et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 205 (1997) 33-38
15. Daniel B.L., Yen Y.F., Glover G.H., et al. Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology 209 2 (1998) 499-509
16. Schnall M.D., Rosten S., Englander S., et al. A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images. Acad Radiol 8 7 (2001) 591-597
17. Kuhl C.K., Mielcareck P., Klaschik S., et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology 211 1 (1999) 101-110
18. Tofts P.S., Berkowitz B., and Schnall M.D. Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model. Magn Reson Med 33 4 (1995) 564-568
19. Ikeda D., Hylton N., Kuhl C., et al. Breast imaging and reporting data system-magnetic resonance imaging in ACR BI-RADS-magnetic resonance. ACR breast imaging and reporting data system, breast imaging atlas (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston (VA)
20. Song H.K., Dougherty L., and Schnall M.D. Simultaneous acquisition of multiple resolution images for dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the breast. Magn Reson Med 46 3 (2001) 503-509
21. Friedman P.D., Swaminathan S.V., and Smith R. SENSE imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 2 (2005) 448-451
22. Kuhl C.K., Schild H.H., and Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 236 (2005) 789-800
23. Bluemke D.A., Gatsonis C.A., Chen M.H., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292 22 (2004) 2735-2742
24. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238 1 (2006) 42-53
25. Hochman M.G., Orel S.G., Powell C.M., et al. Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 204 1 (1997) 123-129