Comparative analysis of concept derivation using the Q-matrix method and facets

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-06-05, Issue , 2006, Pages 21-30

  Barnes, Tiffany ^a   Stamper, John ^a   Madhyastha, Tara ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Charlotte   (United States)

^b FACET Innovations LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING TECHNIQUE; EDUCATIONAL DATA MINING; FACET THEORY; Q-MATRIX;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION; ERROR CORRECTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

DATA MINING;

EID: 33845969915     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ainsworth, S.E., Major, N., Grimshaw, S.K., Hayes, M., Underwood, J.D., Williams, B. & Wood, D.J. 2003. REDEEM: Simple intelligent tutoring systems from usable tools, in T. Murray, S. Blessing & S.E, Ainsworth (eds.). Advanced Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments. pp. 205-232. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Baffes, P. & Mooney, R.J. 1996, A novel application of theory refinement to student modeling. Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-96), pp. 403-408, Portland, OR, August 1996.
3. Barnes, T. 2005. The q-matrix method: Mining student response data for knowledge. In Educational Data Mining: Papers from the 2005 AAAI Workshop, ed. Joseph E. Beck, pp. 39-46. Technical Report WS-05-02, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, California.
4. Barnes, T. & Bitzer, D. 2002. Fault tolerant teaching and automated knowledge assessment. Proceedings of the ACM Southeast Conference (ACMSE 2002), pp. 125-132, Raleigh NC, April 2002.
5. Barnes, T., D. Bitzer, & M. Vouk. 2005. Experimental analysis of the q-matrix method in knowledge discovery. International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp. 603-611, Saratoga Springs, NY, May 2005.
6. Birenbaum, M., Kelly, A., & Tatsuoka, K. 1993. Diagnosing knowledge states in algebra using the rule-space model. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 442-459.
7. Brown, J.S. & Burton, R. 1978. Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2, 155-191.
8. Conati, C., Gertner, A. & VanLehn, K., 2002. Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 12(4): 371-417.
9. Fischoff, B., S. Licthenstein, et al. 1981. Acceptable Risk. Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press.
10. Gigerenzer, G. 2000. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford, Oxford U. Press.
11. Heffeman, N.T. & Koedinger, K.R. 2002. An intelligent tutoring system incorporating a model of an experienced human tutor. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, p. 596-608.
12. Hubal, R. 1992. Retro-adaptive testing and evaluation system. Computer Science Masters Thesis, North Carolina State University.
13. Hunt, E. & Minstrell, J. 1996. Effective instruction in science and mathematics: Psychological principles and social constraints. Issues in Education, 2, pp. 123-162.
14. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan. T., McLaren, B. & Hockenberry, M. 2004. Opening the door to non-programmers: Authoring intelligent tutor behavior by demonstration. Proceedings of 7th Annual Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, Maceio, Brazil, pp. 162-173.
15. Madhyastha, T., Hunt, E., Kraus, P., & Minstrell, J. 2006. The relationship of coherence of thought and conceptual change to ability. 2006 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, April 2006.
16. Minstrell, J. 2001. Facets of students' thinking: Designing to cross the gap from research to standards-based practice. Designing for Science: Implications for Professional, Instructional, and Everyday Science. K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn and T. Okada. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Murray, Tom. 1999. Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: An analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10: 98-129.
18. NovaNET educational network. Online. http://www.pearsondigital.com/ novanet/
19. Sellers, J. 1998, An empirical evaluation of a fault-to lerant approach to computer-assisted teaching of binary relations. Computer Science Masters Thesis, North Carolina State University.
20. Tatsuoka, K. 1983. Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4), 345-354.
21. VanLehn, K., & Martin, J. 1998. Evaluation of an assessment system based on Bayesian student modeling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 8(2), 179-221.