Temporal reliability in contingent valuation (with a restrictive research budget)

Handbook on Contingent Valuation

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 249-262

  Jakus, Paul M ^a   Stephens, Becky ^b   Fly, J Mark ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845913122     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Alberini, A. (1995), 'Efficiency v. bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(2), 169-80.
2. Arrow, K. et al. (1993), 'Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation', Federal Register, 58, 4601-14.
3. Berrens, R.P. et al. (2000), 'Contingent values for New Mexico instream flows: with tests of scope, group-size reminder, and temporal reliability', Journal of Environmental Management, 58 (January), 73-90.
4. Bishop, R.C. and T.A. Heberlein (1979), 'Measuring values of extra-market goods: are indirect measures biased?', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 926-30.
5. Carson, R.T., N.E. Flores and N.F. Meade (2001), 'Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence', Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(2), 173-210.
6. Carson, R.T. et al. (1997), 'Temporal reliability of estimates from contingent valuation', Land Economics, 73(2), 151-63.
7. Desvousges, W.H., S.P. Hudson and M.C. Ruby (1996), 'Evaluating CV performance: separating the light from the heat', in J.R. Kahn and D. Bjornstad (eds), The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, Chapter 7.
8. Downing, M. and T. Ozuna (1996), 'Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(2), 316-22.
9. Haab, T. and K.E. McConnell (1997), 'Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 251-70.
10. Hanemann, W.M. (1999), 'The economic theory of WTP and WTA', in I.J. Bateman and K.G. Willis (eds), Valuing Environmental Preferences, New York: Oxford University Press, Chapter 2.
11. Hanemann, W.M., J.B. Loomis and B. Kanninen (1991), 'Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1255-63.
12. Harrison, G.W. and J.C. Lesley (1996), 'Must contingent valuation surveys cost so much?', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31(1), 79-95.
13. Loomis, J.B. (1989), 'Test-retest reliability of the contingent valuation method: a comparison of general population and visitor responses', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(1), 76-84.
14. Loomis, J.B. (1990), 'Comparative reliability of the dichotomous choice and open-ended contingent valuation techniques', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(1), 78-85.
15. Loomis, J.B. (1999), 'Contingent valuation methodology and the US institutional framework', in I.J. Bateman and K.G. Willis (eds), Valuing Environmental Preferences, New York: Oxford University Press.
16. McConnell, K.E. (1990), 'Models for referendum data: the structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(1), 19-35.
17. McConnell, K.E., I.E. Strand and S. Valdes (1998), 'Testing temporal reliability and carryover effect: the role of correlated responses in test-retest reliability studies', Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 357-74.
18. Poe, G.L., K.L. Giraud, and J.B. Loomis (2005), 'Simple computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions: application to internal and external scope tests in contingent valuation', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 353-65.
19. Reiling, S.D. et al. (1990), 'Temporal reliability of contingent values', Land Economics, 66(2), 128-34.
20. Teisel, M.F. et al. (Three co-authors) (1995), 'Test-retestreliability of contingentvaluationwith independent sample pretest and posttest control groups', American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 613-19.
21. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency (TWRA). http://www.state.tn.us/twra/hunt001c.html (retrieved 7 November 2004.)
22. Whitehead, J.C. and T.J. Hoban (1999), 'Testing for temporal reliability in contingent valuation with time for changes in factors affecting demand', Land Economics, 75(3), 453-65.