Sex, sexual orientation and sex hormones influence human cognitive function

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 259-263

  Kimura, Doreen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEX HORMONE;

COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0029974313     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80081-X     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Halpern DF: Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, edn 2. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
2. Kimura O: Sex differences in the brain. Sci Am 1992, 267:119-125.
3. Eals M, Silverman I: The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology Sociobiol 1994, 15:95-105. This paper follows up the authors' original findings [17] showing better object location memory in women, with familiar objects. Here, they present unfamiliar objects, both in a real-world room situation and by a test using line drawings. Again, women show better recognition of object locations. This series of experiments is novel in showing better performance by women on a spatial task.
4. Geary DC: Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behav Brain Sci 1996, in press.
5. Hamburg BA: The psychobiology of sex differences: an evolutionary perspective. In Sex Differences in Behavior. Edited by Richart RM, Van de Wiele RL New York: Wiley & Sons; 1974:373-392.
6. Lynn R: Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: a paradox resolved. Pers Individ Diff 1994, 17:257-271. Among other things, this paper summarizes sex differences favouring males on spatial tasks in six different countries.
7. Mann VA, Sasanuma S, Sakuma N, Masaki S: Sex differences in cognitive abilities: a cross-cultural perspective. Neuropsychologia 1990, 28:1063-1077.
8. Bohlin CF: Learning style factors and mathematics performance: sex-related differences. Int J Educ Res 1994, 21:387-398.
9. Lubinski DL, Benbow CP: The study of mathematically precocious youth: the first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In Beyond Terman: Contemporary Longitudinal Studies of Giftedness and Talent. Edited by Subotnik RF, Arnold KO. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex; 1994:255-281.
10. Gladue BA, Bailey JM: Spatial ability, handedness, and human sexual orientation. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1995, 20:487-497. With larger-than-usual samples of subjects, this study finds no significant effect of sexual orientation on mental rotations or the water level task, though they do find sex differences. The authors conclude that either there are no orientation differences, or they are small, and thus show up unreliably. The paper has a useful discussion of the sampling and recruitment problems to be overcome in studies of this kind.
11. Hamilton CJ: Beyond sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: the impact of gender trait possession. Br J Psychol 1995, 86:1-20.
12. Moffat SD, Hampson E: A curvilinear relationship between testosterone and spatial cognition in humans: possible influence of hand preference. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1996, in press. In addition to confirming a strong sex difference favouring males on a spatial rotation task, and a nonlinear relation between testosterone levels and spatial ability, this study provides the first definitive data on diurnal variation in cognitive function. Men perform worst on spatial tasks early in the morning, when testosterone levels are highest.
13. Hammer RE, Hoffer N, King WL: Relationships among gender, cognitive style, academic major, and performance on the Piaget water-level task. Percept Mot Skills 1995, 80:771-778.
14. Hall JAY, Kimura D: Sexual orientation and performance on sexually dimorphic motor tasks. Arch Sex Behav 1995, 24:395-407. Two motor tasks showing opposite sex differences are employed, a spatio-motor targeting task that favours men, and a finger dexterity task (Purdue Pegboard) that favours women. The typical sex differences are confirmed. A group of homosexual men does not differ from women on the targetting task, and does not differ from men on the Pegboard task. The suggestion is that homosexual males may show male-typical or female-typical behaviour, depending on the function studied, rather than an intermediate pattern. Neither the sex difference nor the sexual orientation difference is accounted for by finger size, hand strength, or sports history.
15. Greene KS, Gynther MD: Blue versus periwinkle: color identification and gender. Percept Mot Skills 1995, 80:27-32.
16. Stumpf H, Jackson DN: Gender-related differences in cognitive abilities: evidence from a medical school admissions testing program. Pers Individ Diff 1994, 17:335-344.
17. Silverman I, Eals M: Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In The Adapted Mind. Edited by Barlow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby J. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992:533-549.
18. Goy RW, McEwen BS: Sexual Differentiation of the Brain. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1980.
19. Williams CL, Barnett AM, Meck WH: Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behav Neurosci 1990, 104:84-97.
20. Collaer ML, Hines M: Human behavioral sex differences: a role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychol Bull 1995, 118:55-107.
21. Hampson E: Spatial cognition in humans. Possible modulation by androgens and estrogens. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1995, 20:397-404.
22. Resnick SM, Berenbaum SA, Gottesman IJ, Bouchard TJ: Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Dev Psychol 1986, 22:191-198.
23. Helleday J, Bartfai A, Ritzen EM, Forsman M: General intelligence and cognitive profile in women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Psychoneuroendocrinology 1994, 19:343-356.
24. Gouchie C, Kimura D: The relationship between testosterone levels and cognitive ability patterns. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1991, 16:323-334.
25. Hampson E, Moffat SD: Is testosterone related to spatial cognition and hand preference in humans? Brain Cogn 1994, 26:255-266.
26. Shute VJ, Pellegrino JW, Hubert L, Reynolds RW: The relationship between androgen levels and human spatial abilities. Bull Psychonom Soc 1983, 21:465-468.
27. Hampson E: Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1990, 15:97-111.
28. Hampson E: Variations in sex-related cognitive abilities across the menstrual cycle. Brain Cogn 1990, 14:26-43.
29. Kimura D, Hampson E: Cognitive pattern in men and women is influenced by fluctuations in sex hormones. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 1994, 3:57-61. Fluctuations in estrogen levels across the menstrual cycle and across on-off phases of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women were related to variations in cognitive pattern. In men, seasonal fluctuations in testosterone related to variations in spatial, but not other abilities.
30. Janowsky JS, Oviatt SK, Orwoll ES: Testosterone influences spatial cognition in older men. Behav Neurosci 1994, 108:325-332. Testosterone was administered to a group of older men whose endogenous levels were presumably below the 'optimal' level for spatial ability. Their performance on a visuoconstructional task improved relative to a matched placebo control group. Estrogen levels were also assayed, and found to relate inversely to performance on this task.
31. Van Goozen SHM, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren LJG, Frijda NH, Van de Poll NE: Activating effects of androgens on cognitive performance: causal evidence in a group of female-to-male transsexuals. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1153-1157. A battery of cognitive tests was administered twice, once before and again three months after the onset of androgen treatment. Improvement was seen selectively on a test of rotated figures; verbal reasoning was unaffected, and verbal fluency tests were depressed.
32. Bakker J, Van Ophemert J, Slob AK: Postweaning housing conditions and partner preference and sexual behavior of neonatally ATD-treated male rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1995, 20:299-310.
33. LeVay S, Hamer DH: Evidence for a biological influence in male homosexuality. Sci Am 1994, 270:44-49.
34. Watson NV, Kimura D: Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: relation to psychometrically-defined spatial functions. Pers Individ Diff 1991, 12:375-385.
35. Allen LS, Gorski RA: Sexual dimorphism of the anterior commissure and massa intermedia of the human brain. J Comp Neurol 1991, 312:97-104.
36. Holloway RL, DeLacoste MC: Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Hum Neurobiol 1986, 5:87-91.
37. Steinmetz H, Staiger JF, Schlaug G, Huang Y, Jäncke L: Corpus callosum and brain volume in women and men. Neuroreport 1995, 6:1002-1004.
38. McGlone J: Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical survey. Behav Brain Sci 1980, 3:215-263.
39. Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Bronen RA, Fletcher JM, Shankweiler DP, Katz L, Gore JC: Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 1995, 373:607-609. During a phonological speech processing task, functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques showed brain activation limited to the left inferior frontal region in men, whereas in women, activation was more diffuse, involving both left and right frontal regions.
40. Kimura D: Neuromotor Mechanisms in Human Communication. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:139-159.
41. Desmond DW, Glenwick DS, Stern Y, Tatemichi TK: Sex differences in the representation of visuospatial functions in the human brain. Rehabil Psychol 1994, 39:3-14. Equal numbers of male and female patients with right-hemisphere stroke were compared with same-sex control subjects on several visual perceptual tasks. Impairments on all tasks were at least as great in female subjects, suggesting that right-hemisphere dependence for such functions is at least as great in women as in men. This is one of the rare studies comparing the effects of brain lesions in men and women on tasks that depend primarily on the right hemisphere.
42. Cappa SF, Vignolo LA: Sex differences in the site of brain lesions underlying global aphasia. Aphasiology 1988, 2:259-264.
43. Hier DB, Yoon WB, Mohr JP, Price TR, Wolf PA: Gender and aphasia in the stroke data bank. Brain Lang 1994, 47:155-167. In patients with left-hemisphere stroke, infarct lesions producing aphasia were more posteriorly placed in men, more anterior in women.