The relationship between student interest and teacher's use of behavior alteration techniques

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 428-436

  Weber, Keith ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845810504     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090409360007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Berlyne, D. E., 1960. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity, New York: McGraw‐Hill.
2. Berlyne, D. E., 1974. Studies in the new experimental aesthetics, 175–180. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Christophel, D., 1990. The relationships between teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323–340.
4. Christophel, D., and Gorham, J., 1995. A test‐retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44: 292–306.
5. Deci, E. L., 1992. “ The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self‐determination theory perspective ”. In The role of interest in learning and development, Edited by: Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., and Krapp, A., 43–70. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Dewey, J., 1916. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education, New York: Macmillan.
7. French, J. R. P., and Raven, B., 1959. “ The bases for social power ”. In Studies in social power, Edited by: Cartwright, D., 150–167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
8. Frymier, A. B., 1994. A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42: 133–144.
9. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., and Houser, M., 1996. The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45: 181–199.
10. Gorham, J., and Millette, D. M., 1997. A comparative analysis of teacher and student perceptions of sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 46(4): 245–261.
11. Hidi, S., 1990. Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4): 549–571.
12. Hidi, S., and Baird, W., 1988. Strategies for increasing text‐based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23: 465–483.
13. Kearney, P., 1994. “ Behavior alteration techniques ”. In Communication research measures: A source book, Edited by: Rubin, Palmgreen, and Sypher. 103–108. New York, NY: Guilford.
14. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1984. “ Power in the classroom IV: Alternatives to discipline ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Bostrom, R., Vol. 8, 724–746. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1985. Power in the classroom III: Teacher communication techniques and messages. Communication Education, 34: 19–28.
16. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Sorensen, G., and Smith, V. R., 1988. Experienced and prospective teachers’ selections of compliance‐gaining messages for “common”; student misbehaviors. Communication Education, 37: 150–164.
17. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., and Kearney, P., 1985. Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training, and learning. Communication Education, 34: 214–226.
18. Mitchell, M., 1993. Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3): 424–436.
19. Richmond, V. P., 1990. Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39: 181–195.
20. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., and Plax, T. G., 1987. Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36: 1–12.
21. Roach, D. K., 1991. Graduate teaching assistants’ use of behavior alteration techniques in the university classroom. Communication Quarterly, 39(2): 178–188.
22. Roach, D. K., 1995. Teaching assistant argumentativeness: Effects on affective learning and student perceptions of power use. Communication Education, 44: 15–29.
23. Schiefele, U., 1991. Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26: 299–323.
24. Schraw, G., and Dennison, R. S., 1994. The effect of reader purpose on interest and recall. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26: 1–16.
25. Tobias, S., 1994. Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1): 37–54.
26. Wanzer, M. B., and Frymier, A. B., 1999. The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and student's reports of learning. Communication Education, 48(1): 48–62.
27. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., and Patterson, B. R., 2001. Teacher behavior, student interest, and affective learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(1): 71–90.
28. Weber, K., and Patterson, B. R., 2000. Student interest, empowerment, and motivation. Communication Research Reports, 17(1): 22–29.