Basic science confidence in senior medical students from the University of Auckland, New Zealand: Results of the 2005 senior students survey

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 119, Issue 1247, 2006, Pages

  Insull, Phillip ^a,b   Blyth, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Whakatane Hospital   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NEW ZEALAND; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SAFETY; STUDENT SATISFACTION; ADULT; ANATOMY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; PATHOLOGY; PHARMACOLOGY; SCIENCE; STATISTICS;

ADULT; ANATOMY; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; PATHOLOGY; PHARMACOLOGY; SCIENCE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 33845808777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rudland JR, Rennie SC. The determination of the relevance of basic sciences learning objectives to clinical practice using a questionnaire survey. Med Educ. 2003;37:962-5.
2. Davies DP, Shortland G. Are medical students missing out? Med Teach. 1993;15:93-8.
3. Vogel WH. Relevance of "irrelevant" facts in medical education: the value of basic science teaching for later medical practice. Acad Med. 1993;68(2 Suppl):S27-8.
4. Boreham NC, Mawer GE, Foster RW. Medical students' errors in pharmacotherapeutics. Med Educ. 2000;34:188-93.
5. Huppatz C. The essential role of the student in curriculum planning. Med Educ. 1996;30:9-13.
6. Ozan S, Karademir S, Gursel Y, et al. First graduates' perceptions on a problem-based and task-based learning curriculum. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2005; 18:256-71.
7. Hinduja K, Samuel R, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: is anatomy a casualty? Surgeon. 2005;3:84-7.
8. Hinduja K, Samuel R, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: is anatomy a casualty? Surgeon. 2005;3:84-7.
9. Pabst R.Gross anatomy: an outdated subject or an essential part of a modern medical curriculum? Results of a questionnaire circulated to final-year medical students. Anat Rec. 1993;237:431-3.
10. Evans DI, Watt DJ. Provision of anatomical teaching in a new British medical school: getting the right mix. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005;284:22-7.
11. Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall; 1991.
12. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129-36.
13. Fitzjohn J, Wilkinson T, Gill D, Mulder R. The demographic characteristics of New Zealand medical students: the New Zealand Wellbeing, Intentions, Debt and Experiences (WIDE) Survey of Medical Students 2001 study. N Z Med J. 2003;10;116(1183). URL: http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1183/626
14. Davies DP, Shortland G.Are medical students missing out? Med Teach. 1993;15:93-8.
15. Pabst R. Gross anatomy: an outdated subject or an essential part of a modern medical curriculum? Results of a questionnaire circulated to final-year medical students. Med Educ. 2003;37:15-21.
16. Hinduja K, Samuel R, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: is anatomy a casualty? Surgeon. 2005;3:84-7.
17. Spielmann PM, Oliver CW. The carpal bones: a basic test of medical students' and junior doctors' knowledge of anatomy. Surgeon. 2005;3:257-9.
18. Miles KA.Diagnostic imaging in undergraduate medical education: an expanding role. Clin Radiol. 2005 Jul;60(7):742-5.
19. McMillan DE, Wenger GR. Effects of curriculum and format changes in a medical pharmacology course, 1983 to 1987. J Med Educ. 1987;62:836-41.
20. Vlahovic Palcevski V, Vitezic D, Zupan G, Simonic A. Education in clinical pharmacology at the Rijeka School of Medicine, Croatia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:685-9.
21. Tamayo G, Santibanez M, Javier Meana J. Evaluation of a pharmacology educational activity based on a research project: a randomized, controlled and blind analysis of medical students' perceptions. Med Teach. 2005;27:53-60.
22. Haab P. Education of respiratory physiology in 2nd-year medicine: current challenges. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1995; 125:2201-2.
23. Hood N. Animal Iabs. The New Physician, 1999;Oct:21-2.
24. Samsel RW, Schmidt GA, Hall JB, et al. Cardiovascular physiology teaching: computer simulations vs. animal demonstrations. Advances Physiology Education. 1994;11:S36-46.
25. Mattick K, Marshall R, Bligh J. Tissue pathology in undergraduate medical education: atrophy or evolution? J Pathol. 2004;203:871-6.
26. O'Grady G. Death of the teaching autopsy. BMJ. 2003;327:802-3.
27. Underwood J. Resuscitating the teaching autopsy. BMJ. 2003;327:803-4.
28. Abbadi MA, Saleh H. Dedicating specific sessions of cytopathology courses to medical students. A survey/consensus study. Acta Cytol. 2004;48:13-6.
29. Raeburn JM, Dubignon JM, Grant VJ, Richmond DE. Behavioural science at the Auckland Medical School: introduction and evaluation of a revised programme. N Z Med J. 1989;102:642-4.
30. Benbassat J, Baumal R, Borkan JM, Ber R. Overcoming barriers to teaching the behavioral and social sciences to medical students. Acad Med. 2003;78:372-80.