The place of framing: Multiple audiences and antiwar protests near Fort Bragg

Qualitative Sociology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 485-505

  Heaney, Michael T ^a   Rojas, Fabio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalitions; Countermovements; Framing; Iraq War; Place; Protest

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845806891     PISSN: 01620436     EISSN: 15737837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11133-006-9040-y     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Auyero, J. (2004). When everyday life, routine politics, and protest meet. Theory and Society, 33, 417-441.
2. Babb, S. (1996). "A true American system of finance": Frame resonance in the U. S. labor movement, 1866 to 1886. American Sociological Review, 61, 1033-1052.
3. Basu, M. (2005). Military wife becomes war protester. Atlanta Journal-Constitution March 19.
4. Benford, R. D. (1993). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71, 677-701.
5. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Cortright, D. (2004). A peaceful superpower. Goshen, Indiana: Fourth Freedom Forum.
7. Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects. Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
8. Ellingson, S. (1995). Understanding the dialectic of discourse and collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 100-144.
9. Evans, J. H. (1997). Multi-organizational fields and social movement organization frame content. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 451-469.
10. Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W. W., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Shaping abortion discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Fine, G. A. (1995). Public narration and group culture. In H. Johnston and B. Klandermans (Eds.), Social movements and culture (pp. 127-143). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Finer, J. (2005). Iraq War opponents stage protest near Fort Bragg. Washington Post. March 20.
13. Gamson, W. A. (1988). Political discourse and collective action. International Social Movement Research, 1, 219-244.
14. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Garrow, D. J. (1978). Protest at Selma. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
18. Gould, R. V. (1995). Insurgent identities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Gramsci, A. (1992). Prison notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Jacobson, D. (2002). Place and belonging in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Klatch, R. E. (1988). Of meanings and masters. Polity, 21, 137-154.
22. Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23. Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media. Theory and Society, 33, 367-391.
24. Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 198-230.
25. Lutz, C. (2001). Homefront. Boston: Beacon Press.
26. McAdam, D. (1996). The framing function of movement tactics. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 338-356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. McCarthy, J. D., & McPhail, C. (2006). Places of protest. Mobilization, 11, 229-247.
28. McVeigh, R., Myers, D. J., & Sikkink, D. (2004). Corn, Klansmen, and Coolidge. Social Forces, 83, 653-690.
29. Maney, G. M., Woehrle, L. M., & Coy, P. G. (2005). Harnessing and challenging hegemony. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 357-381.
30. Mansbridge, J. J. (1986). Why we lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Marshall-Genzer, N. (2005). Army base is site of protests marking war anniversary. Weekend Edition, March 20, 2005. Washington, DC: National Public Radio.
32. Martin, D. G., & Miller, B. A. (2003). Space and contentious politics. Mobilization, 8, 143-156.
33. Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1628-1660.
34. Miller, B. A. (2000). Geography and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35. Miller, B. A., & Martin, D. G. (Eds.) (2003). Special issue: Space, place, and contentious politics. Mobilization, 8, 143-232.
36. Naples, N. (2002). From "beloved community" to family values. In D. Meyer, N. Whittier, & B. Robnett (Eds.), Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state (pp. 226-246). New York: Oxford University Press.
37. NCPJC. (2006). April 2006 statewide convention. http://www. ncpeacejustice.org/
38. Nepstad, S. E. (2004). Persistent resistance. Social Problems, 51, 43-60.
39. Office of the Command Historian. (2005). Fort Bragg history. http://www.bragg.army.mil/
40. Oliver, P. E., & Johnston, H. (2000). What a good idea! Mobilization, 4, 37-54.
41. Proffitt, B. (2004). Fayetteville proposal to UFPJ. Raleigh: NCPJC.
42. Riker, W. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
44. Sewell Jr., W. H. (2001). Space in contentious politics. In R. R. Aminzade, J. A. Goldstone, D. McAdam, E. J. Perry, W. H. Sewell Jr., S. Tarrow, & C. Tilly (Eds.), Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics (pp. 51-88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380-412). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
46. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
47. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
49. Steinberg, M. W. (1998). Tilting the frame. Theory and Society, 27, 845-872.
50. Steinberg, M. W. (1999). The talk and back talk of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 736-780.
51. Stevenson, R. (2005). Bush to tell why he sees a "clear path to victory." New York Times. June 28.
52. Stock, S. (2006).After 3 years, peace march is about ending war - now. Raleigh News and Observer. March 20.
53. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54. Tilly, C. (2003). Contention over space and place. Mobilization, 8, 221-226.
55. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
56. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). United States Census 2000. http://www.census.gov/
57. Veterans Gulf March. (2006). Veterans march to New Orleans. http://www.vetgulfmarch.org/
58. Walgrave, S., & Verhulst, J. (2004). Who takes to which streets? Paper presented at the conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, Uppsala, Sweden.
59. Westby, D. L. (2002). Strategic imperative, ideology, and frame. Mobilization, 7, 287-304.
60. Williams, A. (2005). Thousands protest war. Fayetteville Observer. March 20.
61. Zald, M. N., & Useem, B. (1987). Movement and countermovement interaction. In M. N. Zald & J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), Social movements in organizational society (pp. 247-271). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
62. Zhao, D. (2001). The power of Tiananmen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.