Genetic polyandry and sexual conflict in the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 187-197

  Portnoy, David S ^a   Piercy, Andrew N ^b   Musick, John A ^a   Burgess, George H ^b   Graves, John E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bateman's principles; Carcharhinidae; Genetic benefit; Microsatellite; Paternity analysis; Sexually antagonistic co evolution

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATLANTIC OCEAN; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SHARK;

ANIMALS; ATLANTIC OCEAN; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SHARKS;

CARCHARHINIDAE; CARCHARHINUS PLUMBEUS; CHONDRICHTHYES; ELASMOBRANCHII;

EID: 33845792975     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03138.x     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Andersson M, Iwasa Y (1996) Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 53-58.
2. Arnold SJ (1994) Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. The American Naturalist, 144, S126-S149.
3. Arnold SJ, Duvall D (1994) Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. The American Naturalist, 143, 317-348.
4. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour, 60, 145-164.
5. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D et al. (2002) Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics, 36, 19-45.
6. Bateman A (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349-368.
7. Bigelow HB, Schroeder W (1948) Sharks. In: Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Part I (eds Van J, Breder C, Hildebrand S, Parr A, Schroeder W), pp. 59-546. Sears Foundation for Marine Research,Yale University, New Haven.
8. Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego.
9. Blouin MS, Parsons M, Lacaille V, Lotz S (1996) Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Molecular Ecology, 5, 393-401.
10. Brown WD, Bjork A, Schneider K, Pitnick S (2004) No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 58, 1242-1250.
11. Burgess GH, Morgan AC (2002) Commercial shark fishery observer program. Renewal of an observer program to monitor the directed commercial shark fishery in the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic: 1999 fishing seasons. Final Report, US National Marine Fisheries Service, Highly Migratory Species Management Division Award NA97FF0041, Washington.
12. Byrne PG, Roberts JD (1999) Simultaneous mating with multiple males reduce fertilization success in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 266, 717-721.
13. Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2000) Does multiple paternity improve fitness of the frog Crinia georgiana. Evolution, 54, 968-973.
14. Byrne PG, Roberts JD (2004) Intrasexual selection and group spawning in quacking frogs (Crinia georgiana). Behavioral Ecology, 15, 872-882.
15. Cameron E, Day T, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 1055-1060.
16. Carling M, Wiseman PA, Byers JA (2003) Microsatellite analysis reveals multiple paternity in a population of wild pronghorn antelopes. Journal of Mammalogy, 84, 1237-1243.
17. Carrier JC, Pratt HLJ, Martin LK (1994) Group reproductive behaviours in free-living nurse sharks, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Copeia, 3, 646-656.
18. Carrier JC, Pratt HLJ, Castro JI (2004) Reproductive Biology of Elasmobranchs. In: Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives (eds Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR), pp. 269-286. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
19. Casey JG, Natanson LJ (1992) Revised estimates of age and growth of the Sandbar Shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) from the western North Atlantic. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 1474-1477.
20. Chapman T, Liddle LF, Kalb JM, Wolfner MF, Partridge L (1995) Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature, 373, 241-244.
21. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 41-47.
22. Chapman DD, Prodohl PA, Gelsleichter J, Manire CA, Shivji MS (2004) Predominance of genetic monogamy by females in a hammerhead shark, Sphyrna tiburo: implications for shark conservation. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1965-1974.
23. Compagno LJV (1984) FAO species catalogue Vol 4. Sharks of the World Part2 Carcharhiniformes, 1 edn. FAO, Rome.
24. Cordero A, Andres JA (2002) Male coercion and convenience polyandry in calopterygid damselfly. Journal of Insect Science, 2, 7pp.
25. DeWoody JA, Avise JC (2001) Genetic perspectives on the natural history of fish mating systems. Journal of Heredity, 92, 167-172.
26. Dodds KG, Tate ML, McEwan JC, Crawford A (1996) Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 92, 966-975.
27. Estoup A, Larigiader CR, Perrot E, Chourrout D (1996) Rapid one tube DNA extraction for reliable PCR detection of fish polymorphic markers and transgenes. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 5, 295-298.
28. Evans JP, Magurran AE (2000) Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 10074-10076.
29. Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, Ashley MV (2002) The breeding biology of lemon sharks at a tropical nursery lagoon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 1655-1611.
30. Feldheim KA, Gruber SH, Ashley MV (2004) Reconstruction of parental microsatellite genotypes reveals female polyandry and philopatry in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. Evolution, 58, 2332-2342.
31. Fitze PS, Le Galliard J, Federici P, Richard M, Clobert J (2005) Conflict over multiple-partner mating between males and females of the polygynandrous common lizards. Evolution, 11, 2451-2459.
32. Fiumera AC, DeWoody YD, DeWoody JA, Asmussen MA, Avise JC (2001) Accuracy and precision of methods to estimate the number of parents contributing to a half-sib progeny array. Journal of Heredity, 92, 120-126.
33. Garner TWJ, Schmidt BR (2003) Relatedness, body size and paternity in the alpine newt, Triturus alpestris. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 270, 619-624.
34. Gibbs HL, Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT et al. (1990) Realized reproductive success of polygynous red-winged blackbirds revealed by DNA markers. Science, 250, 1394-1397.
35. Goetz J, McFarland KP, Rimmer CC (2003) Multiple paternity and multiple male feeders in Bicknell's thrush (Catharus bicknelli). Auk, 120, 1044-1053.
36. Gosselin T, Sainte-Marie B, Bernatchez L (2005) Geographic variation of multiple paternity in the American Lobster, Homarus americanus. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1517-1525.
37. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/ softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995).
38. Gray EM (1997) Female red-winged blackbirds accrue material benefits from copulating with extra-pair males. Animal Behaviour, 53, 625-639.
39. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Head ML, Brooks R (2006) Sexual coercion and the opportunity for sexual selection in guppies. Animal Behaviour, 71, 515-522.
41. Heist EJ, Graves JE, Musick JA (1995) Population genetics of the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) in the Gulf of Mexico and Mid-Atlantic Bight. Copeia, 1995, 555-562.
42. Henningsen AD, Smale MJ, Gordon I, Garner R, Marin-Osorno R, Kinnunen N (2004) Chapter 17: Captive breeding and sexual conflict in elasmobranchs. In: Elasmobranch Husbandry Manual: Captive Care of Sharks, Rays and Their Relatives (eds Smith M, Warmolts D, Thoney D, Hueter RE), pp. 237-248. Ohio Biological Survey Inc, Columbus.
43. Holland B, Rice WR (1998) Perspective: chase away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution, 52, 1-7.
44. Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75, 21-64.
45. Jones AG (2005) GERUD 2.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from half sib-progeny arrays with known or unknown parents. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 708-711.
46. Jones AG, Ardren WR (2003) Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 2511-2523.
47. Jones AG, Avise JC (2001) Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. Journal of Heredity, 92, 150-158.
48. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Arnold SJ, Avise JC (2000) The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 267, 677-680.
49. Jones AG, Arguello JR, Arnold SJ (2002) Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 269, 2533-2539.
50. Joung S-J, Chen C-T (1995) Reproduction in the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, in the waters off Northeastern Taiwan. Copeia, 1995, 659-665.
51. Kajiura S, Tricas T (1996) Seasonal dynamics of dental sexual dimorphism in the Atlantic stingray Dasyatis sabina. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 2297-2306.
52. Keil A, Sachser N (1998) Reproductive benefits from female promiscuous mating in a small mammal. Ethology, 104, 897-903.
53. Kelly CD, Godin J-GJ, Wright JM (1999) Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 266, 2403-2408.
54. Klimley AP (1985) Schooling in the large predator, Sphyrna lewini, a species with low risk of predation: a non-egalitarian state. Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychology, 70, 297-319.
55. Kraaijeveld-Smit FJL, Ward SJ, Temple-Smith PD, Paetkau D (2002) Factors influencing paternity success in Antechinus agilis: last-male sperm precedence, timing of mating and genetic compatibility. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15, 100-107.
56. Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210-1226.
57. Lee PM, Hays GC (2004) Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 6530-6535.
58. Lessells C (1999) Sexual conflict in animals. In: Levels of Selection in Evolution (ed. Keller L.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
59. Lessells C (2006) The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 361, 301-316.
60. Maklakov AA, Lubin Y (2004) Sexual conflict over mating in a spider: increased fecundity does not compensate for the costs of polyandry. Evolution, 58, 1135-1140.
61. Martinez JL, Moran P, Perez J, De Gaudemar B, Beall E (2000) Multiple paternity increases effective size of southern Atlantic salmon populations. Molecular Ecology, 9, 293-298.
62. Musick JA, Bransetter S, Colvocoresses JA (1993) Trends in shark abundance from 1974 to 1991 for the Chesapeake Bight region of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Coast. NOAA Technical Report, 115, 1-18.
63. Myers EM, Zamudio KR (2004) Multiple paternity in an aggregate breeding amphibian: the effect of reproductive skew on estimates of male reproductive success. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1952-1963.
64. Naylor GJP (1992) The phylogenetic relationships among requiem and hammerhead sharks: inferring phylogeny when thousands of equally most parsimonious trees result. Cladistics, 8, 295-318.
65. Neff BD, Pitcher TE (2002) Assessing the statistical power of genetic analyses to detect multiple mating in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology, 61, 739-750.
66. Newcomer SD, Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1999) Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 96, 10236-10241.
67. Ohta Y, Okamura K, Mckinney EC et al. (2000) Primitive synteny of vertebrate major histocompatibility complex class I and class II genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 4712-4717.
68. Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelström H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature, 383, 585.
69. Parker G (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 361, 235-259.
70. Partridge L, Hurst LD (1998) Sex and conflict. Science, 281, 2003-2008.
71. Portnoy DS, McDowell JR, Thompson K, Musick JA, Graves JE (2006) Isolation and characterization of five dinucleotide microsatellite loci in the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 431-433.
72. Pratt HL (1979) Reproduction in the blue shark, Prionace glauca. Fishery Bulletin US, 77 (445), 470.
73. Pratt HL, Carrier JC (2001) A review of elasmobranch reproductive behaviour with a case study on the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 60, 157-188.
74. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
75. Raymound M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Heredity, 86, 248-249.
76. Rowe L (1994) The costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Animal Behaviour, 48, 1049-1056.
77. Rowe L, Arnqvist G (2002) Sexually antagonistic co-evolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution, 56, 754-767.
78. Rowe S, Hutchings JA (2003) Mating systems and the conservation of commercially exploited marine fish. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18, 567-572.
79. Sakaluk SK, Rachel L, Avery Weddle CB (2006) Cryptic sexual conflict in gift-giving insects: chasing the chase-away. The American Naturalist, 167, 94-104.
80. Saville KJ, Lindley AM, Maries EG, Carrier JC, Pratt HLJ (2002) Multiple paternity in the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 63, 347-351.
81. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 82-90.
82. Shine R, Langkilde T, Mason RT (2003) The opportunistic serpent: male garter snakes adjust courtship tactics to mating opportunities. Behaviour, 140, 1509-1526.
83. Simmons LW (2003) The evolution of polyandry: patterns of genotypic variation in female mating frequency, male fertilization success and a test of the sexy-sperm hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 16, 624-634.
84. Sminkey TR, Musick JA (1995) Age and growth of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus, before and after population depletion. Copeia, 1995, 871-883.
85. Smith SE, Au DA, Show C (1998) Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49, 663-678.
86. Springer S (1960) Natural History of the sandbar shark, Eulamia milberti. Fishery Bulletin US, 178, 1-38.
87. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
88. Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited Review. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1013-1027.
89. Tregenza T, Wedell N, Chapman T (2006) Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 261, 229-234.
90. Wade MJ (1979) Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. The American Naturalist, 114, 742-747.
91. Wade MJ, Arnold SJ (1980) The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice and sperm precedence. Animal Behaviour, 28, 446-461.
92. Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics, 166, 1963-1979.
93. Warner RR, Shapiro DY, Marconato A, Peterson CW (1995) Sexual conflict: males with highest mating success convey the lowest fertilization benefits to females. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 262, 135-139.
94. Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1997) Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 205-215.
95. Yamaguchi N, Sarno RJ, Johnson WE, O'Brien SJ, Macdonald DW (2004) Multiple paternity and reproductive tactics of free-ranging American minks. Journal of Mammalogy, 85, 432-439.
96. Yasui Y (1998) The 'genetic benefit' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 246-250.
97. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4 edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
98. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry II; post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 264, 69-75.
99. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2001) Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1051-1063.
100. Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility (Invited Article). Ethology, 109, 929-950.