Cryptic sexual conflict in gift-giving insects: Chasing the chase-away

American Naturalist

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 94-104

  Sakaluk, Scott K ^a   Avery, Rachel L ^a   Weddle, Carie B ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antagonistic coevolution; Chase away; Nuptial food gifts; Sensory exploitation; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

NUPTIAL GIFT; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFLICT; COPULATION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; INSECT; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPERMATOGONIUM;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); COPULATION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GRYLLIDAE; INSECTS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPERMATOGONIA;

ACHETA DOMESTICUS; GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLODES SIGILLATUS; HEXAPODA; INSECTA;

EID: 29844447540     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/498279     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alcock, J. 1994. Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annual Review of Entomology 39:1-21.
2. Allison, D. 1995. Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
3. Andersson, J., A.-K. Borg-Karlson, and C. Wiklund. 2000. Sexual cooperation and conflict in butterflies: a male-transferred anti-aphrodisiac reduces harassment of recently mated females. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:1271-1275.
4. Arnqvist, G. 1989. Sexual selection in a water strider: the function, mechanism of selection and heritability of a male grasping apparatus. Oikos 56:344-350.
5. _. 2004. Sexual conflict and sexual selection: lost in the chase. Evolution 58:1383-1388.
6. Arnqvist, G., and T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60: 145-164.
7. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 1995. Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 261:123-127.
8. Burpee, D. M., and S. K. Sakaluk. 1993. Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evolutionary Ecology 7:240-250.
9. Calos, J. B., and S. K. Sakaluk. 1998. Paternity of offspring in multiply-mated female crickets: the effect of nuptial food gifts and the advantage of mating first. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265:2191-2195.
10. Cordero, C. 1995. Ejaculate substances that affect female insect reproductive physiology and behavior: honest or arbitrary traits? Journal of Theoretical Biology 174:453-461.
11. Davies, N. B. 1992. Dunnock behaviour and social evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Destephano, D. B., and U. E. Brady. 1977. Prostaglandin and prostaglandin synthetase in the cricket, Acheta domesticus. Journal of Insect Physiology 23:905-911.
13. Desutter-Grandcolas, L. 2003. Phylogeny and the evolution of acoustic communication in extant Ensifera (Insecta, Orthoptera). Zoologica Scripta 32:525-561.
14. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. _. 2004a. Male-female conflict and genitalia: failure to confirm predictions in insects and spiders. Biological Reviews 79:121-186.
16. _. 2004b. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58:1947-1970.
17. Eggert, A.-K., and S. K. Sakaluk. 1995. Female-coerced monogamy in burying beetles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:147-153.
18. Eggert, A.-K., K. Reinhardt, and S. K. Sakaluk. 2003. Linear models for assessing mechanisms of sperm competition: the trouble with transformations. Evolution 57:173-176.
19. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2002. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Animal Behaviour 64:361-367.
20. Fleischman, R. R., and S. K. Sakaluk. 2004. Sexual conflict over remating in house crickets: no evidence of an anti-aphrodisiac in males' ejaculates. Behaviour 141:633-646.
21. Flook, P. K., S. Klee, and C. H. F. Rowell. 1999. Combined molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) and implications for their higher systematics. Systematic Biology 48: 233-253.
22. Forstmeier, W. 2004. Female resistance to male seduction in zebra finches. Animal Behaviour 68:1005-1015.
23. Gäde, G., H. G. Marco, and L. Desutter-Grandcolas. 2003. A phylogenetic analysis of the adipokinetic neuropeptides of Ensifera. Physiological Entomology 28:283-289.
24. García-González, F., and L. W. Simmons. 2005. Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition. Current Biology 15:271-275.
25. Gavrilets, S., G. Arnqvist, and U. Friberg. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268:531-539.
26. Getty, T. 1999. Chase-away sexual selection as noisy reliable signaling. Evolution 53:299-302.
27. Gwynne, D. T. 1984. Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets. Nature 307:361-363.
28. _. 1995. Phylogeny of the Ensifera (Orthoptera): a hypothesis supporting multiple origins of acoustical signalling, complex spermatophores and maternal care in crickets, katydids, and weta. Journal of Orthoptera Research 4:201-216.
29. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
30. Hosken, D., and R. Snook. 2005. How important is sexual conflict? American Naturalist 165(suppl.):S1-S4.
31. Ivy, T. M., and S. K. Sakaluk. 2005. Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets. Evolution 59:152-159.
32. Ivy, T. M., J. C. Johnson, and S. K. Sakaluk. 1999. Hydration benefits to courtship feeding in crickets. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266:1523-1528.
33. Johnsen, A., J. T. Lifjeld, P. A. Rohde, C. R. Primmer, and H. Ellegren. 1998. Sexual conflict over fertilizations: female bluethroats escape male paternity guards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43: 401-408.
34. Jormalainen, V. 1998. Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Quarterly Review of Biology 73:275-304.
35. Kasuya, E., and N. Sato. 1998. Effects of the consumption of male spermatophylax on the oviposition schedule of females in the decorated cricket, Gryllodes sigillatus. Zoological Science 15:127-130.
36. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:653-664.
37. Loher, W. 1979. The influence of prostaglandin E2 on oviposition in Teleogryllus commodus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 25:107-119.
38. Loher, W., and M. D. Zaretsky. 1989. Structure and function of the endocrine system. Pages 114-146 in F. Huber, T. E. Moore and W. Loher, eds. Cricket behavior and neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
39. Miyatake, T., T. Chapman, and L. Partridge. 1999. Mating-induced inhibition of remating in female Mediterranean fruit flies Ceratitis capitata. Journal of Insect Physiology 45:1021-1028.
40. 2α in the house cricket and other insects. Insect Biochemistry 12: 599-603.
41. _. 1987. Regulation of long-term oviposition in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus: roles of prostaglandin and factors associated with sperm. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 6:59-72.
42. Orshan, L., and M. P. Pener. 1991. Effects of the corpora allata on sexual receptivity and completion of oocyte development in females of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Physiological Entomology 16:231-242.
43. Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews 45:525-567.
44. _. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pages 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
45. Pizzari, T., and R. R. Snook. 2003. Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:1223-1236.
46. Reinhold, K., and K.-G. Heller. 1993. The ultimate function of nuptial feeding in the bushcricket Poecilimon veluchianus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32:55-60.
47. Rice, W. R., and B. Holland. 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:1-10.
48. _. 1999. Reply to comments on the chase-away model of sexual selection. Evolution 53:302-306.
49. Ritchie, M. G., D. Sunter, and L. R. Hockham. 1998. Behavioral components of sex role reversal in the tettigoniid bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger. Journal of Insect Behavior 11:481-491.
50. Rosenthal, G. G., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. Chase-away sexual selection: resistance to "resistance." Evolution 53:296-299.
51. Sakaluk, S. K. 1984. Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer. Science 223:609-610.
52. _. 1985. Spermatophore size and its role in the reproductive behaviour of the cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:1652-1656.
53. _. 1986. Sperm competition and the evolution of nuptial feeding behavior in the cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Walker). Evolution 40:584-593.
54. _. 1987. Reproductive behaviour of the decorated cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): calling schedules, spatial distribution, and mating. Behaviour 100:202-225.
55. _. 1991. Post-copulatory mate guarding in decorated crickets. Animal Behaviour 41:207-216.
56. _. 2000. Sensory exploitation as an evolutionary origin to nuptial food gifts in insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267:339-343.
57. Sakaluk, S. K., and W. H. Cade. 1980. Female mating frequency and progeny production in singly and doubly mated house and field crickets. Canadian Journal of Zoology 58:404-411.
58. _. 1983. The adaptive significance of female multiple matings in house and field crickets. Pages 319-336 in D. T. Gwynne and G. K. Morris, eds. Orthopteran mating systems: sexual competition in a diverse group of insects. Westview, Boulder, CO.
59. Sakaluk, S. K., and A.-K. Eggert. 1996. Female control of sperm transfer and intraspecific variation in sperm precedence: antecedents to the evolution of a courtship food gift. Evolution 50:694-703.
60. Sakaluk, S. K., P. J. Bangert, A.-K. Eggert, C. Gack, and L. V. Swanson. 1995. The gin trap as a device facilitating coercive mating in sagebrush crickets. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 261: 65-71.
61. Sakaluk, S. K., J. M. Schaus, A.-K. Eggert, W. A. Snedden, and P. L. Brady. 2002. Polyandry and fitness of offspring reared under varying nutritional stress in decorated crickets. Evolution 56:1999-2007.
62. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
63. Simmons, L. W. 1987. Sperm competition as a mechanism of female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21:197-202.
64. _. 1988. The contribution of multiple mating and spermatophore consumption to the lifetime reproductive success of female field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus). Ecological Entomology 13:57-69.
65. _. 2001. The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatibility and good-sperm hypotheses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14:585-594.
66. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York.
67. Strambi, A., C. Strambi, and M. Cayre. 1997. Hormonal control of reproduction and reproductive behavior in crickets. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 35:393-404.
68. Thornhill, R. 1976a. Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). American Naturalist 110: 529-548.
69. _. 1976b. Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. American Naturalist 110:153-163.
70. _. 1980. Rape in Panorpa scorpionflies and a general rape hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 28:52-59.
71. _. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist 122:765-788.
72. Tregenza, T., and N. Wedell. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726-1730.
73. _. 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71-73.
74. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136-179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.
75. Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biological Reviews 73:43-78.
76. Wagner, W. E., Jr., R. J. Kelley, K. R. Tucker, and C. J. Harper. 2001. Females receive a life-span benefit from male ejaculates in a field cricket. Evolution 55:994-1001.
77. Wedell, N., and A. Arak. 1989. The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Decticus verrucivorus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24: 117-125.
78. Will, M. W., and S. K. Sakaluk. 1994. Courtship feeding in decorated crickets: is the spermatophylax a sham? Animal Behaviour 48: 1309-1315.
79. Wolfner, M. F. 1997. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27:179-192.
80. Xue, L., and M. Noll. 2000. Drosophila female sexual behavior induced by sterile males showing copulation complementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97:3272-3275.
81. Zeh, J. A., and D. W. Zeh. 2003. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109: 929-950.
82. Zuk, M., and L. W. Simmons. 1997. Reproductive strategies of the crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Pages 89-109 in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, eds. The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.