The time course of visuo-motor affordances

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 519-524

  Fischer, Martin H ^a   Dahl, Christoph D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b Institute of Neuroinformatics Zurich   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Affordances; Lateralization; Perception action; Visuo motor coupling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMISPHERE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845778430     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0781-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aziz-Zadeh L, Koski L, Zaidel E, Mazziotta J, Iacoboni M (2006) Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system. J Neurosci 26:2964-2970
2. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433-436
3. Craighero L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G, Umilta C (1999) Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1673-1692
4. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:761-788
5. Fischer MH, Deubel H, Wohlschlaeger A, Schneider WX (1999) Visuomotor mental rotation of saccade direction. Exp Brain Res 127:224-232
6. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
7. Gonzalez CL, Ganel T, Goodale MA (2006) Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. J Neurophysiol 95:3496-3501
8. Goodale MA, Milner AD (2004) Sight unseen. Oxford University Press, Oxford
9. Graziano MS, Gross CG (1998) Spatial maps for the control of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:195-201
10. Handy TC, Grafton ST, Shroff NM, Ketay S, Gazzaniga MS (2003) Graspable objects grasp attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat Neurosci 6:421-427
11. Handy TC, Borg JS, Turk DJ, Tipper CM, Grafton ST, Gazzaniga MS (2005) Placing a tool in the spotlight: spatial attention modulates visuomotor responses in cortex. NeuroImage 26:266-276
12. Humphreys GW, Riddoch MJ (2001) Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nat Neurosci 4:84-88
13. Meegan DV, Tipper SP (1998) Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. Q J Exp Psychol A 51:225-249
14. Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. Pellizzer G, Georgopoulos AP (1993) Common processing constraints for visuo-motor and visual mental rotation. Exp Brain Res 93:165-172
16. Phillips JC, Ward R (2002) S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time Course and specificity of response activation. Vis Cogn 9:540-558
17. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, Edwards S, Baker T, Willson K (2003) Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci 6:82-89
18. Roy EA (1985) Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders. North Holland, New York
19. Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830-846
20. Tucker M, Ellis R (2001) The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis Cogn 8:769-800
21. Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol (Amst) 116:185-203
22. Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev Monogr Suppl 3(2(whole no. 13)):1-114