Cash and alternate methods of accounting in an experimental game

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 316-321

  Solnick, Sara J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Experiments; Methods; Strategy method; Trust Game

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845743932     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berg J., Dickhaut J., and McCabe K. Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1995) 122-142
2. Brandts J., and Charness G. Hot vs. cold: sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experimental Economics 2 (2000) 227-238
3. Brosig J., Weimann J., and Yang C.-L. The hot versus cold effect in a simple bargaining experiment. Experimental Economics 6 (2003) 75-90
4. Buchan, N., Solnick, S., Croson, R., 2005. Trust and gender: an examination of behavior, biases, and beliefs in the investment game. Working paper. University of Wisconsin.
5. Burks S.V., Carpenter J.P., and Verhoogen E. Playing both roles in the Trust Game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51 (2003) 195-216
6. Cason T.N., and Mui V.-L. Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42 (1998) 248-265
7. Chaudhuri, A., Gangadharan, L., 2004. Gender differences in trust and reciprocity. Working paper. Wellesley College.
8. Chaudhuri A., Sopher B., and Strand P. Cooperation in social dilemmas, trust and reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 231-249
9. Cochard, F., Nguyen, P.V., Willinger, M., 2000. Trust and reciprocity in a repeated investment game. Working paper. Laboratoire d'Économie Expérimentale de Strasbourg.
10. Croson R., and Buchan N. Gender and culture: international experimental evidence from Trust Games. American Economic Review 89 (1999) 386-391
11. Fahr R., and Irlenbusch B. Fairness as a constraint on trust in reciprocity: earned property rights in a reciprocal exchange experiment. Economic Letters 66 (2000) 275-282
12. Fershtman C., and Gneezy U. Discrimination in a segmented society: an experimental approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001) 351-377
13. Glaeser E.L., Laibson D.I., Scheinkman J.A., and Soutter C.L. Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (2000) 811-846
14. Gunnthorsdottir A., McCabe K., and Smith V. Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 49-66
15. Harbaugh W.T., Krause K., Liday S.G., and Vesterlund L. Trust in children. In: Ostrom E., and Walker J. (Eds). Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons for Experimental Research (2002), Russell Sage, New York 302-322
16. Hoffman E., McCabe K., and Smith V.L. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 653-660
17. Isaac R.M., Walker J.M., and Williams A.W. Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 54 (1994) 1-36
18. Koford, K., 1998. Trust and reciprocity in Bulgaria: a replication of Berg, Dickhaut and McCabe (1995). Working paper 98-08. University of Delaware.
19. Kormendi R.C., and Plott C.R. Committee decisions under alternative procedural rules: an experimental study applying a new non-monetary method of preference inducement. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 (1982) 175-195
20. Kruse J.B., and Thompson M.A. A comparison of salient rewards in experiments: money and class points. Economics Letters 74 (2001) 113-117
21. Ortmann A., Fitzgerald J., and Boeing C. Trust, reciprocity and social history: a re-examination. Experimental Economics 3 (2000) 81-100
22. Smith V.L., and Walker J.M. Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry 31 (1993) 245-261
23. van der Heijden E.C.M., Nelissen J.H.M., Potters J.J.M., and Verbon H.A.A. Simple and complex gift exchange in the laboratory. Economic Inquiry 39 (2001) 280-297