Student voice or empowerment? Examining the role of school-based youth-adult partnerships as an avenue toward focusing on social justice

International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning

Volumn 10, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-17

  Mitra, Dana L ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845740170     PISSN: None     EISSN: 12069620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about research while you're doing it. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Camino, L. A. (2000). Youth-adult partnerships: Entering new territory in community work and research. Applied Developmental Science, 4(Supplement Issue).
3. Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
4. Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123-141.
5. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6. Ginwright, S. A. (2005). On urban ground: Understanding African-American intergenerational partnerships in urban communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 33 (1), 101-110.
7. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
8. Goodwillie, S. (Ed.). (1993). Voices from the future: Our children tell us but violence in America. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc.
9. Johnson, J. H. (1991). Student voice motivating students through empowerment (No. ED337875). Eugene: Oregon School Study Council.
10. Jones, K. (2004). An assessment of community-based youth-adult relationships. Unpublished dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, Dept. of Agricultural & Extension Education.
11. Jones, K., & Perkins, D. (2004). Youth-adult partnerships. In C. B. Fisher & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Applied developmental science: An encyclopedia of research, policies, and programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Kirshner, B., O'Donoghue, J. L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (Eds.). (2003). New directions for youth development: Youth participation improving institutions and communities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Kushman, J. W. (Ed.). (1997). Look who's talking now: Student views of learning in restructuring schools. (Vol. ED028257). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
14. Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth-driven and adult-driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 57-74.
15. Lashway, L. (2003). Distributed leadership. Research Roundup, 19(4).
16. Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. International Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155-172.
17. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
19. Mitra, D. (2001). Opening the floodgates: Giving students a voice in school reform. Forum, 43(2), 91-94.
20. Mitra, D. L. (2003). Student voice in school reform: Reframing student-teacher relationships. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 289-304.
21. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing "student voice" in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651-688.
22. National Research Council. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. O'Connor, C., & Camino, L. (2005). Youth participation in research and evaluation: Outcomes for youth. Youth and adult leaders for program excellence. Madison, WI: Community Youth Connection, University of Wisconsin Extension.
24. Rudduck, J., Day, J., & Wallace, G. (1997). Students' perspectives on school improvement. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Rethinking educational change with heart and mind (The 1997 ASCD Year Book). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
27. Thorkildsen, T. A. (1994). Toward a fair community of scholars: Moral education as the negotiation of classroom practices. Journal of Moral Education, 23(4), 371-385.
28. Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. London: Falmer Press.
29. Zeldin, S. (2004). Youth as agents of adult and community development: Mapping the processes and outcomes of youth engaged in organizational governance. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 2(75-90).
30. Zeldin, S., Camino, L., & Mook, C. (2005). The adoption of innovation in youth organizations: creating the conditions for youth-adult partnerships. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 121-135.