Postnatal development of canine axial globe length measured by B-scan ultrasonography

Veterinary Ophthalmology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 2-5

  Tuntivanich, N ^a   Petersen Jones, Simon M ^a   Steibel, Juan P ^a   Johnson, C ^a   Forcier, Janice Q ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Axial globe; B scan ultrasonography; Dog

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; DOG; ECHOGRAPHY; EYE; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; MALE; NEWBORN; ORBIT; REFERENCE VALUE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BIOMETRY; DOGS; EYE; FEMALE; MALE; ORBIT; REFERENCE VALUES;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 33845703630     PISSN: 14635216     EISSN: 14635224     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2007.00481.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aguirre GD, Rubin LF, Bistner SI. The development of the canine eye. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1972; 33: 2399-2414.
2. Gum GG, Gelatt KC, Samuelson DA. Maturation of the retina of the canine neonate as determined by electroretinography and histology. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1984; 45: 1166-1171.
3. Tuntivanich N, Khan NW, Petersen-Jones SM. The maturation of the electroretinogram of the dog. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science [ARVO Abstract] 2003; 44: 4962.
4. Ekesten B, Torrang I. Age-related changes in ocular distances in normal eyes of Samoyeds. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1995; 56: 127-133.
5. Schiffer SP, Rantanen NW, Leary GA, Bryan GM. Biometric study of the canine eye, using A-mode ultrasonography. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1982; 43: 826-830.
6. Cottrill NB, Banks WJ, Pechman RD. Ultrasonographic and biometric evaluation of the eye and orbit of dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1989; 50: 898-903.
7. Gaiddon J, Rosolen SG, Steru L et al. Use of biometry and keratometry for determining optimal power for intraocular lens implants in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1991; 52: 781-783.
8. Williams DL. Lens morphometry determined by B-mode ultrasonography of the normal and cataractous canine lens. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2004; 7: 91-95.
9. Hamidzada WA, Osuobeni EP. Agreement between A-mode and B-mode ultrasonography in the measurement of ocular distances. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 1999; 40: 502-507.
10. Little RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW et al. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 1996; 42.
11. Kurtz D, Manny R, Hussein M. Variability of the ocular component measurements in children using A-scan ultrasonography. Optometry and Vision Science 2004; 81: 35-43.
12. Rogers M, Cartee RE, Miller W et al. Evaluation of the extirpated equine eye using B-mode ultrasonography. Veterinary Radiology 1986; 27: 24-29.
13. Plummer CE, Ramsey DT, Hauptman JG. Assessment of corneal thickness, intraocular pressure, optical corneal diameter, and axial globe dimensions in Miniature horses. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2003; 64: 661-665.
14. Gilger BC, Davidson MG, Howard PB. Keratometry, ultrasonic biometry, and prediction of intraocular lens power in the feline eye. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1998; 59: 131-134.
15. Fernandes A, Bradley DV, Tigges M et al. Ocular measurements throughout the adult life span of rhesus monkeys. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2003; 44: 2373-2380.