The survival and clinical performance of resin-based composite restorations used to treat localised anterior tooth wear

British Dental Journal

Volumn 194, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 566-572

  Redman, C D J ^a   Hemmings, K W ^b   Good, J A ^b  

^a RAF Halton   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; DENTAL POLYGLASS; GLASS IONOMER; HERCULITE XR; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL HEALTH; DENTAL SURGERY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SURVIVAL RATE; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FRACTURE; UNITED KINGDOM; CHEMISTRY; DURAFILL; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS REPAIR; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILICATE CEMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH ATTRITION;

EID: 3042522548     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810209     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Callis P D, Charlton G, Clyde J. A study of patients seen in consultant clinics in conservative dentistry at Edinburgh Dental Hospital. Br Dent J 1993; 174: 106-110.
2. Kelleher M, Bishop K. Tooth surface loss : an overview. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 61-66.
3. Shaw L, Smith A. Erosion in children: an increasing clinical problem? Dent Update 1994; 21: 103-106.
4. Smith B G N, Knight J K. A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with aetiological factors. Br Dent J 1984; 157: 16-19.
5. Bartlett D W, Evans D F, Anggiansah A, Smith B G N. A study of the association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and palatal dental erosion. Br Dent J 1996; 181: 125-132.
6. Eccles J D. Erosion affecting the palatal surfaces of upper anterior teeth in young people. Br Dent J 1982; 152: 375-378.
7. King P A. Adhesive techniques. Br Dent J 1999; 186: 321-326.
8. Berry D C, Poole D F G. Attrition: possible mechanisms of compensation. J Oral Rehabil 1976; 3: 201-206.
9. Tallgren A. Changes in adult face height. Acta Odontol Scand (suppl 24) 1957: 63-75 and 113-116.
10. Murphy T. Compensatory mechanisms in facial height adjustment to functional tooth attrition. Aust Dent J 1959; 4: 312-323.
11. Crothers A J R. Tooth wear and facial morphology. J Dent 1992; 20: 333-341.
12. Bishop K, Briggs P, Kelleher M. The aetiology and management of localized anterior tooth wear in the young adult. Dent Update 1994; 21: 153-160.
13. Evans R, Beckett H, Briggs P. The clinical management of localised anterior tooth surface loss. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 436 Abst.No: 27.
14. Carlsson G E, Ingervall B I, Kocak G. Effect of increasing vertical dimension on the masticatory system in subjects with natural teeth. J Prosth Dent 1979; 41: 284-289.
15. Dahl B L, Krogstad O, Karlsen K. An alternative treatment in cases with advanced localized attrition. J Oral Rehabil 1975; 2: 209-214.
16. Dahl B L, Krogstad O. The effect of a partial bite raising splint on the occlusal face height. An X-ray cephalometric study in human adults. Acta Odontol Scand 1982; 40: 17-24.
17. Dahl B L, Krogstad O. The effect of a partial bite raising appliance on the inclination of upper and lower front teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 311-314.
18. Dahl B L, Krogstad O. Long term observations of an increased face height obtained by a combined orthodontic/prosthetic approach. J Oral Rehabil 1985; 12: 173-176.
19. Ricketts D N J, Smith B G N. Minor axial tooth movement in preparation for fixed prostheses. Eur J Prosthod Restor Dent 1993; 1: 145-149.
20. Ricketts D N J, Smith B G N. Clinical techniques for producing and monitoring minor axial tooth movement. Eur J Prosthod Restor Dent 1993; 2: 5-9.
21. Briggs P, Bishop K, Djemal S. The clinical evolution of the 'Dahl Principle'. Br Dent J 1997; 183: 171-176.
22. Millar B J, Robinson P B, Inglis A T. Clinical evaluation of an anterior hybrid composite resin over 8 years. Br Dent J 1997; 182: 26-30.
23. Combe E C, Burke F J T. Contemporary resin-based composite materials for direct placement restorations: packables, flowables and others. Dent Update 2000; 27: 326-336.
24. Downer M C, Azli N A, Bedi R, Moles D R, Setchell D J. How long do routine restorations last ? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999; 187: 432-439.
25. Brown D. The status of restorative dental materials. Dent Update 1997; 24: 402-406.
26. Darbar U R, Hemmings K W. Treatment of localised anterior tooth wear with composite restorations at an increased occlusal vertical dimension. Dent Update 1997; 24: 72-75.
27. Hemmings K W, Darbar U R, Vaughan S. Tooth wear treated with composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 287-293.
28. Bevenius J, Evans S, L'Estrange P. Conservative management of erosion-abrasion: a system for the general dental practitioner. Aust Dent J 1994; 39: 3-10.
29. Elderton R J. Assessment of the quality of restorations: a literature review. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4: 217-226.
30. Smales R J, Creaven P J. Evaluation of three clinical methods for assessing amalgam and resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54: 340-346.
31. Cvar J F, Ryge G. USPHS Publ. No 720-244. San Francisco: US Government Printing Office, 1970.
32. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 87: 369-377.
33. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 347-358.
34. Welbury R R, Shaw A J, Murray J J, Gordon P H, McCabe J F. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 93-97.
35. Zhao D, Botsis J, Drummond J L. Fracture studies of selected dental restorative composites. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 198-207.
36. Ferracane J L, Condon J R. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 262-267.
37. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Three-year follow-up of five posterior composites: in vivo wear. J Dent 1993; 21: 74-78.
38. Smales R J. Effect of enamel bonding, type of restoration, patient age and operator on the longevity of an anterior composite resin. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 130-133.
39. Gough M B, Setchell D J. A retrospective study of 50 treatments using an appliance to produce localised occlusal space by relative axial tooth movement. Br Dent J 1999; 187: 134-139.