Floral evolution, development, and convergence: The hierarchical-significance hypothesis

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 158, Issue 6 SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages

  Tucker, Shirley C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE; DEVELOPMENT; FLORAL EVOLUTION; HIERARCHICAL SIGNIFICANCE HYPOTHESIS; ONTOGENY;

EID: 0031427239     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/297514     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Chappill JA 1995 Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: the development of an explicit phylogenetic hypothesis. Pages 1-9 in MD Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
2. Cronquist A 1981 An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
3. Dahlgren R 1970 Parallelism, convergence and analogy in some South African genera of Leguminosae. Bot Not 123:551-568.
4. Derstine KS, SC Tucker 1991 Organ initiation and development of inflorescences and flowers of Acacia baileyana. Am J Bot 78:816-832.
5. Doyle JJ 1995 DNA data and legume phylogeny: a progress report. Pages 11-30 in M Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
6. Endress PK 1994 Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Endress PK, M Jenny, ME Fallen 1983 Convergent elaboration of apocarpous gynoecia in higher advanced dicotyledons (Sapindales, Malvales, Gentianales). Nord J Bot 3:293-300.
8. Gemmeke V 1982 Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Mimosaceen-Blüten. Bot Jahrb Syst 103:185-210.
9. Grimes J 1992 Metamerism, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology, with special reference to the Pithecellobium-complex (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae). Brittonia 44:140-159.
10. _ 1995 Generic relationships of Mimosoideae tribe Ingeae, with emphasis on the New World Pithecellobium-complex. Pages 101-121 in MD Crisp, JJ Doyle, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 7. Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
11. _ 1996 Branch apices, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology in some mimosoid legumes (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Telopea 6:729-748.
12. Herendeen PS, WL Crepet, DL Dilcher 1992 The fossil history of the Leguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications. Pages 303-316 in PS Herendeen, DL Dilcher, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 4. The fossil record. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
13. Irwin HS, RC Barneby 1981 Cassieae. Pages 97-106 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
14. _ 1982 The American Cassiinae: a synoptical revision of Leguminosae, tribe Cassieae, subtribe Cassiinae in the New World. Mem NY Bot Gard 35:1-918.
15. Judd WS, RW Sanders, MJ Donoghue 1994 Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Pap Bot 5:1-51.
16. Juncosa AM, PB Tomlinson 1987 Floral development in mangrove Rhizophoraceae. Am J Bot 74:1263-1279.
17. Kantz KE 1996 Floral development in the caesalpinioid tribe Caesalpinieae (Fabaceae). PhD diss. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
18. Kantz KE, SC Tucker 1995 Developmental basis of floral characters in the Caesalpinieae. Pages 33-40 in IK Ferguson, SC Tucker, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 6. Structural botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
19. Olmstead RG 1995 Species concepts and plesiomorphic species. Syst Bot 20:623-630.
20. Olmstead RG, B Bremer, KM Scott, JD Palmer 1993 A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato, based on rbcL sequences. Ann Mo Bot Gard 80:700-722.
21. Olmstead RG, HJ Michaels, KM Scott, JD Palmer 1992 Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequence of rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard 79:249-265.
22. Philipson WR 1960 Relationship and convergence in angiosperms. Phytomorphology 10:367-376.
23. Polhill RM 1981 Sophoreae. Pages 213-230 in RM Polhill, PH Raven, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
24. _ 1994 Classification of the Leguminosae. Pages 35-36 in Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae. Vol 1. Chapman & Hall, New York.
25. Proctor M, P Yeo, A Lack 1996 The natural history of pollination. Harper Collins, London.
26. Ramírez-Domenech JI 1989 Floral ontogenetic studies in mimosoid legumes. PhD diss. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
27. Reeves PA, RG Olmstead 1993 Polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae and origin of the aquatic Callitrichaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences. Am J Bot 80(suppl):174.
28. Stebbins GL Jr 1951 Natural selection and the differentiation of angiosperm families. Evolution 5:299-324.
29. Tucker SC 1984 Origin of symmetry in flowers. Pages 351-396 in RA White, WC Dickison, eds. Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Academic Press, New York.
30. _ 1987a Floral initiation and development in legumes. Pages 183-239 in CH Stirton, ed. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
31. _ 1987b Pseudoracemes in papilionoid legumes: their nature, development, and variation. Bot J Linn Soc 95:181-206.
32. _ 1989a Overlapping organ initiation and common primordia in flowers of Pisum sativum (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Am J Bot 76:714-729.
33. _ 1989b Evolutionary implications of floral ontogeny in legumes. Pages 59-76 in CH Stirton and JL Zarucchi, eds. Advances in legume biology. No 29. Monographs in Systematic Botany. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
34. _ 1990 Loss of floral organs in Ateleia (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Sophoreae). Am J Bot 77:750-761.
35. _ 1991 Helical floral organogenesis in Gleditsia, a primitive caesalpinioid legume. Am J Bot 78:1130-1149.
36. _ 1992 The role of floral development in studies of legume evolution. Can J Bot 70:692-700.
37. _ 1993 Floral ontogeny in Sophoreae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). I. Myroxylon (Myroxylon group) and Castanospermum (Angylocalyx group). Am J Bot 80:65-75.
38. _ 1994 Floral ontogeny in Sophoreae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). II. Sophora sensu lato (Sophora group). Am J Bot 81: 368-380.
39. _ 1996a Trends in evolution of floral ontogeny in Cassia sensu stricto, Senna, and Chamaecrista (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae: Cassiinae): a study in convergence. Am J Bot 83:687-711.
40. _ 1996b Stamen structure and development in legumes, with emphasis on poricidal stamens of caesalpinioid tribe Cassieae. Pages 141-175 in W D'Arcy, R Keating, eds. The anther. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Tucker SC, AW Douglas 1994 Ontogenetic evidence and phylogenetic relationships among basal taxa of legumes. Pages 11-32 in IK Ferguson, SC Tucker, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 6. Structural botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
42. Uhl NW, HE Moore 1980 Androecial development in six polyandrous genera representing five major groups of palms. Ann Bot 45:57-75.