Facets of informetrics: Preface

Information-Wissenschaft und Praxis

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 385-389

  Stock, Wolfgang G ^a   Weber, Sonja ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845597125     PISSN: 14344653     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (59)

1. Almind, T.C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997): Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to 'webometrics'. Journal of Documentation, 53, 404-426.
2. Baker, S.L., St Lancaster, F.W. (1991): The Measurements and Evaluation of Library Services. 2nd Ed. Arlington, VA: Information Resource Press.
3. Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2001): Perspectives of webometrics. Scientometrics, 50, 65-82.
4. Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004): Towards a basis framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 1216-1227.
5. Blackert, L., & Siegel, K. (1979): Ist in der wissenschaftlich- technischen Information Platz für die INFORMETRIE? Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der TH Ilmenau, 25, 187-199.
6. Bonitz, M. (1982): Scientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie. Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, 96(1), 19-24.
7. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., & Penan, H. (1993): La Scientometrie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
8. Cronin, B. (2001): Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 27(1), 1-7.
9. Cronin, B., & Atkins, H.B., Eds. (2000): The Web of Knowledge. A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
10. Della Mea, V., & Mizzaro, S. (2004): Measuring retrieval effectiveness: A new proposal and a first experimental validation. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 55, 530-543.
11. Egghe, L. (2005a): Power Laws in the Information Production Process: Lotkaian Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
12. Egghe, L. (2005b): Expansion of the field of informetrics: Origins and consequences. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1311-1316.
13. Egghe, L. (2006): Expansion of the field of informetrics: The second special issue. Information Processing & Management, 42, 1405-1407.
14. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990): Introduction to Informetrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Garfield, E. (1972): Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
16. Garfield, E. (1979): Citation Indexing. Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Göcke, M. (1999): Ist Qualität messbar? Kundenorientiertes Qualitätsmanagement bei Informationsdienstleistern. Password, no. 9, 22-30.
18. Griliches, Z. (1990): Patent statistics as economic indicators. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.
19. Harter, S.P., & Hert, C.A. (1997): Evaluation of information retrieval systems: Approaches, issues and methods. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 3-94.
20. Juchem, K., Schlögl, C., & Stock, W.G. (2006): Dimensionen der Zeitschriftenszientometrie. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis, 57, 31-37.
21. Kantor, P.B. (1984): Objective Performance Measures for Academic and Research Libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
22. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1996): Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36, 435-444.
23. Nacke, O. (1979): Informetrie. Ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin. NfD 30(1979)6, 219-226.
24. Narin, F. (1994): Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30, 147-155.
25. Nielsen, J. (2000): Designing Web Usability. Indianapolis, IND: New Riders Publ.
26. th Annual Conference on WWW Applications.
27. Poll, R., & te Boekhorst, P. (1996): Measuring Quality. International Guidelines for Performance Measurements in Academic Libraries. München: Saur.
28. Pritchard, A., & Wittig, G.R. (1981): Bibliometrics: A Bibliography and Index. Vol. 1: 1874-1959. Watford: ALLM Books.
29. Rauter, J. (2006): Zitationsanalyse und Interextualität. Hamburg: Kovac.
30. Reichmann, G. (2001): Universitätsbibliotheken im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: DUV.
31. Roßmann, N. (2002): Website-Usability. Landtag NRW. Köln: Fachhochschule Köln; Fachbereich Bibliotheks-und Informationswesen. (Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; 34).
32. Röttger, M., & Stock, W.G. (2003): Die mittlere Güte von Navigationssystemen. Ein Kennwert für komparative Analysen von Websites bei Usability-Nutzertests. Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis, 54, 401-404.
33. Salton, G. (1992): The state of retrieval system evaluation. Information Processing & Management, 28, 441-449.
34. Schlögl, C. (2004): Zeitschriften des Informationswesens: Eine Expertenbefragung. ODOK '03. Ein Jahrzehnt World Wide Web: Rückblick - Standortbestimmung - Ausblick (pp. 63-72). Wien: Phoibos.
35. Schlögl, C., & Petschnig, W. (2005): Library and information science journals: An editor survey. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 29 W. 4-32.
36. Sengupta, I.N. (1992): Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics. Libri, 42(2), 75-98.
37. Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H., & Moricz, M. (1998): Analysis of a very large AltaVista query log. Palo Alto, CA: Digital Systems Research Center. (SRC Technical Note 1998-014).
38. Spink, A., & Cole, C., Eds. (2006): New Directions in Human Information Behavior. Dordrecht: Springer.
39. Spink, A., & Jansen, B.J. (2004): Web Search. Public Searching of the Web. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, B.J., & Saracevic, T. (2001): Searching the Web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 52, 226-234.
41. Stock, W.G. (1992): Wirtschaftsinformationen aus informetrischen Online-Recherchen. Nachrichten für Dokumentation, 43, 301-315.
42. Stock, W.G. (1998): Ein allgemeiner Bibliotheksindex. Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 45, 59-89.
43. Stock, W.G. (2000): Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme. Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen. Password, no. 5, 22-31.
44. Stock, W.G. (2001a): Publikation und Zitat. Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung. Köln: Fachhochschule Köln; Fachbereich Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen. (Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; 29).
45. Stock, W.G. (2001b): Informations-TUV: Qualitätskriterien für Firmeninformationen im Internet. Password, no. 10, 23-28.
46. Stock, W.G. (2006): On relevance distributions. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 57, 1126-1129.
47. Stock, W.G., & Lewandowski, D. (2006): Suchmaschinen und wie sie genutzt werden. WISU - Das Wirtschaftsstudium, 35, 1078-1083.
48. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1992): An introduction to informetrics. Information Processing & Management, 28, 1-3.
49. Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1996): Some perspectives on the evaluation of information retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, 1-3.
50. Thelwall, M. (2004): Link Analysis. An Information Science Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
51. Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005): Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 81-135.
52. van Raan, A.F.J. (1997): Scientometrics: State-of-the-art. Scientometrics, 38, 205-218.
53. Vaughan, L., & Thelwall, M. (2003): Scholarly use of the Web: What are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 29-38.
54. Voorhees, E.M. (2002): The philosophy of information retrieval evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2406, 355-370.
55. th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2005) Proceedings. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Online: http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/ trec14/papers/OVERVIEW14.pdf (2006-08-28).
56. Wilson, C.S. (1999): Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107-247.
57. Wilson, T.D. (2000): Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.
58. Wolfram, D. (2003): Applied Informetrics for Information Retrieval Research. Westport, Conn., London: Libraries Unlimited.
59. Zuccala, A. (2006): Author cocitation analysis is to intellectual structure as Web colink analysis is to ...? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1487-1502.